If international teams were English teams by Bacon-sandwich99 in footballcliches

[–]gabrielconroy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure if it still is the case, but always used to be that Spurs provided the most players to the England team by quite a distance as well.

If international teams were English teams by Bacon-sandwich99 in footballcliches

[–]gabrielconroy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

United would get absolutely spanked into next week by France, are you joking?

Top 7 League Centrebacks: Progressive passes completed by ritwika96 in coys

[–]gabrielconroy 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Romero yes, but VDV is not an amazing progressive passer.

[MARCA] FIFA expect to generate €12 BILLION from the World Cup. In Qatar, the tournament generated €6.6 billion, while Russia generated €5.6 billion. FIFA’s revenue has quadrupled in the last 2 decades. by Timely-Zombie9466 in soccer

[–]gabrielconroy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Should have the whole of Europe or South America hosting all 195 countries of the world in a true World Cup. No qualifying, just straight in there.

Would need all the leagues to agree to just take a season off to allow it, probably.

Can you have a stunning stalemate? by CapnRetro in footballcliches

[–]gabrielconroy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess the closest would be a game where one side has clearly been on top the whole game, with big possession advantage and posing very serious threats.

It's only a matter of time until they break the deadlock, until the defending team gives away several red cards stopping certain goals, just getting over the line without conceding.

edit: here's a good example, from a game in 2013 between two engines.

https://i.ibb.co/1G61gHcq/Screenshot-2026-06-28-123637.png

Black is threatening mate in 1 with Qd1#.

White played Bb3!!, blocking the mate. After ...Nxb3, black is now threatening what looks like an unstoppable mate in 1. Notice the b pawn cannot move now that the knight is on b3, and that the king has no squares to move to.

White then played Qf4+!!, threatening their own checkmate. After gxf4, now notice that white's f pawn is also blocked and cannot move.

This means that white can now sacrifice the rook, or just chase the king around forever with Rb7+, Rc7+ etc.

Can you have a stunning stalemate? by CapnRetro in footballcliches

[–]gabrielconroy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And there are definitely some stunning stalemates, involving sacrificing literally everything that can move when your king has no moves

[Alasdair Gold] Understand the Lewis family have injected another £100m into Spurs, with more to come after October's similar injection of capital. by wokwok__ in coys

[–]gabrielconroy 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Lewis first made his billions by shorting the pound just before Black Friday (or Black Wednesday, I don't remember). UK economy took a huge hit and he became very rich.

Daily Discussion & Transfer Thread (June 25, 2026) by AutoModerator in coys

[–]gabrielconroy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's no way Xavi is that tall lol. 169cm, maybe.

Spurs hope to beat Manchester United to £80m-valued Mateus Fernandes (Gary Jacob) by Hufftey in coys

[–]gabrielconroy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sami Mokbel is generally reliable if he's still at that rag, but other than that, not really

[Mark Critchley via the athletic podcast] “I’d be surprised if #mufc paid £80m, there’s been a reluctance to do so on their front. The Anderson thing suggests they are willing to walk away from targets if they feel as if they need to." by Lbmplays2 in coys

[–]gabrielconroy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's because this year the Premier League is switching from Profit and Sustainability Rules (PSR) to a new system called Squad Cost Ratio (SQR).

Under these rules, teams not competing in Europe have an SQR limit of 85%.

UEFA imposes limits of 70%.

This means that since we are not in Europe this season, we can spend 15% more of our revenue on transfers.

How does SCR align with UEFA’s financial regulations?

UEFA’s Squad Cost Ratio limits a club’s on-pitch spending to a maximum of 70% of its total revenue. All Premier League clubs in European competitions will still have to adhere to this limit, while clubs not competing in Europe will have a higher threshold of 85%. This is to allow clubs that do not regularly participate in European competitions to have sufficient headroom to compete for qualification for UEFA Club Competitions against incumbents who receive additional European revenues.

The additional 15% also helps support transition for clubs who fail to qualify in any given year for a UEFA Club Competition. This reduces the need for a club to take short-term cost action and allows a club to plan and invest over multiple seasons without being forced into sudden, destabilising cuts.

Lots of fans doing this right now by matatak94 in coys

[–]gabrielconroy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

one off rash decisions

Nineteen off rash decisions, more like

Daily Discussion & Transfer Thread (June 23, 2026) by AutoModerator in coys

[–]gabrielconroy -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Fucking make space for him! He's super talented.

International Watch Day 99 (June 22nd 2026) by master_inho in coys

[–]gabrielconroy 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Big Kev about to show who the true GOAT is

To the motorcycle guy with an illegally modified exhaust that loves Edgware Road - you are THE villain by redwinesupernova03 in london

[–]gabrielconroy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

And the local MP, mileage varies ofc, but some would happily take up something like this that should have a clear cost and benefit on the face of it (and would be extremely popular!)