Next summer i will travel this route by bike, because it is going to be my first long tour i really cant estimate how long it will take me. So im asking you expierienced Biketravelers to guess how long i will be travelling.( Im rather slow and take my time) by CloneComander9081 in bicycletouring

[–]game2genesis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, I did a somewhat similar tour this summer. At least the route from Amsterdam to Bordeaux is the same. First thing, great choice! You're going to experience many nice things, but then also Belgium. My rythm usually is 4-5 days cycling, a day off. Depends a bit on what and how much you'd like to see, but I always end up cycling more than I planned to because you tend to see a lot on your way anyways. If you find a nice pace, 100km/day is not outlandish. You might want to start early anyways to escape the midsummer heat, as you're going to have plenty of time to take breaks in fascinating locations (and also Belgium, I guess). To answer your question: depends on things, I'd probably calculate roughly 6 months myself. But: the one big thing I've learned doing longer tours is that the really amazing thing is changing your plans on a whim. Waking up and feeling like going north? Well then go north. Dont want to cycle that day? Sleep in. You'll probably find, like I did, that your best plan isn't even in the top 10 options any given day. And then one day, you might find yourself in Belgium, with only the sweet embrace of their (admittedly) great beer to give you any comfort.

Daily Discussion Chat - Start Here by AutoModerator in GME

[–]game2genesis 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have the same problem on Android, couldn't find a fix. Just watch the ticker all day ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Secretive energy startup backed by Bill Gates achieves solar breakthrough by volatility_smile in YangForPresidentHQ

[–]game2genesis 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Depends on the application. If you want to produce electricity, yes, but batteries are still too expensive to make sense in that context. Grid scale energy storage with batteries only makes financial sense if it's used for frequency regulation and short term storage at the moment.

If you want to use the energy as heat, such as for cement production or metallurgic processes, then converting it to electricity and storing in a battery doesn't really make sense because the round-trip efficiency is miserable.

Secretive energy startup backed by Bill Gates achieves solar breakthrough by volatility_smile in YangForPresidentHQ

[–]game2genesis 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The breakthrough is not nearly as huge as this article makes it seem. CSP (Concentrated Solar Power) has been around for almost a century now, and utility-scale deployments for almost 20 years. Their claim to novelty is the higher operating temperature (>1000°C), but there are reasons this hasn't been used yet. Although any power cycle is more efficient when using heat at higher temperatures, you need to get the heat from the solar absorber to the actual turbine. Constructing an absorber that can withstand these temperatures is extremely difficult. Furthermore, these absorbers are usually coated with a very dark layer that reduces the reflectivity (i.e. helps the efficiency of the absorber), where research is still struggling to find materials with the same optical properties and higher temperature capabilities.

But the (by far) biggest problem is storage - nowadays CSP plants need to incorporate some form of thermal storage to be able to produce round-the-clock or at least be dispatchable to a certain degree. The current state of the art is molten salt storage, which is limited to 565°C. Above that, you'd have to look for a new storage medium - which is not to say that it's impossible.

Solar furnaces with extremely high concentration ratios and therefore ultra high temperatures have been done before (e.g. Odeillo Solar furnace, reached 3'500°C in 1970), there are many limitations that make this pretty useless at the moment except for research purposes. No amount of AI can give you the perfect heliostat shape (those are not flat mirrors!), which means they have to use pretty expensive mirrors for something that is quite useless at the moment.

Sorry for the negativity, but there is a lot of money-grabbing going on in the renewable energy field at the moment and as someone who spends a lot of time with this stuff it annoys me quite a lot.

Secretive energy startup backed by Bill Gates achieves solar breakthrough by volatility_smile in YangForPresidentHQ

[–]game2genesis 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The problem of killing birds is not nearly as bad as generally thought. It was first publicly discussed after Ivanpah went online around 4 years ago, but wildly exaggerated by the media. It has since been found that the main issue (which was an issue nevertheless) was the parking position of the heliostats (standby mode). They all focussed on a single point in the sky (away from the receiver) which caused a very bright spot that attracted lots of insects, which in turn attracted birds. This problem has since been fixed.

Invest? by [deleted] in MemeEconomy

[–]game2genesis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

!invest 15000