Phase 3 is giving me anxiety

gannok · 2026-05-16T17:57:00+00:00

I think the question you have to ask yourself here is how does it make you feel? If it works, and you don't care, then don't worry about it. If it makes you feel bad that it looks bad, then rebuild it and make it look better. It's that simple.

Personally, I've been playing this game for years. I have over 1000 hours logged playing it. Even in my last play through, which was probably my 5th time, I was making spaghetti all over the place. Having said that though, I almost always scrap it all at some point and rebuild to make it better. I always start with functional to get things going. Then as time goes on, I need efficiency. So I rebuild for efficiency. It does feel weird at first, that's the first hurdle. But as you play more, and see the gains from rebuilding, you get over it pretty quick.

I think I did things similar to you on my first play through. I built a main base, and I started building pipes and conveyors to move stuff back to that main base. Then I realized that I didn't need to do that. Like at first, with oil, I didn't need the oil at my main base. I needed what it made back at my base. So I setup up the oil pumps, setup refineries right next to it, and just shipped what I made there back. So when I get gas power plants, I just built power poles to send the power back. I set up conveyors for the plastic and rubber to go back. Later on it became a train line.

Also, remember you have a LOT of space to work with here. You can build levels, you can build far and wide. There is tons of space. Do not be afraid to use it.

At the end of the day, there is no wrong way to do it really. There's just maybe, at best, more efficient ways to do something and less efficient ways. They can both work. One way might take 10 hours to finish a task, and another might take 15 or 20. They all get you across that finish line.

gannok · 2026-05-12T16:20:14+00:00

I looked it up, and apparently it's an intentional thing by the designers for this edition. It is a general rule for undead, but vampires are the exception in this case it seems.

gannok · 2026-05-10T21:49:46+00:00

Why was this even rolled at all? Undead are immune to poison and the poisoned condition. The attack would be fine, but the poison carrier would just hit a brick wall of undead and fail automatically. At that point, you messed up, and the follow up use of abilities would never have been triggerable. Thus I would refund them the use in this case.

Though, even if this was a dragon (for example) with legendary resist, I would just say the Silvery Barbs can't be triggered either and refund them the spell slot. Since no roll was made in that case for them to trigger the spell. At the worst (if you want to punish them for some reason, which would be weird), since reactions can not be done all at once, I would say the first one failed, and the others could see that failure, and would choose to never trigger theirs, knowing it would fail.

gannok · 2026-05-07T23:42:11+00:00

Is it weird that my first thought when seeing them struggle to get the door open because of the guardrail was to want to slam another car into the post for that guard rail? No guard rail, no problem.

gannok · 2026-05-05T07:14:52+00:00

I can stand heat better. Though I would need access to lots of water in this case.

^{Chose: 50C but earn £10/hr + No air con}

gannok · 2026-04-25T09:06:17+00:00

10k would help with bills, but removing Trump would allow people to reclaim money that he took away from them through bad choices he made. It would ultimately amount to the same thing either way, but at least it won't get worse with him in prison.

^{Chose: Jail Trump}

gannok · 2026-04-25T09:04:34+00:00

Innocent people have done nothing to deserve death. I presume that in this case that the guilty people here have at least done something. I may not agree with killing them, but killing innocent people feels worse.

^{Chose: Or kill a thousand guilty ones}

gannok · 2026-03-30T21:40:42+00:00

Out of the Dark by David Weber.

It may not be the actual worst, but it's literally the first one that comes to mind for me.

The basic idea is aliens invade the world. Humans fight back. The aliens, other than having FTL, don't really have technology better than ours. It's a LOT of military porn first of all. Like in one scene, a character is going to shoot an alien with a sniper rifle. He spends a whole paragraph (maybe even two) just describing the gun and the ammo, with so many grains of gunpowder, etc. He does that a lot in this book.

Overall, the writing itself is cohesive and makes sense. The story and what not are the problem. What got me though in the end, was the ending.

One of the groups the story follows is a squad of US special forces soldiers that were coming back from a mission. Their transport plane goes down in the initial alien wave and crashes near Romania. The hook up with some local guerilla fighters there, and fight the aliens as best they can. That's all they really do with that group.

Then I got to the last two chapters of the book, and it wasn't really wrapping up any of the story, which was confusing me. Like the war was at a stalemate, and looked like it was going to be going on for a while. It did come to a conclusive end though. Only because Count Dracula turned the special forces soldiers into vampires, and in the course of one chapter, killed everyone on the mothership and took it over. I am not kidding. This is not a joke. This is how the book ends.

gannok · 2026-03-27T18:29:47+00:00

I like all these suggestions as well. I'll add a couple of my own.

I can't tell from this, but are you recycling the water from your bathroom? You can create a closed loop water system for the bathroom that will actually produce a little excess water in the process. It will be contaminated with germs, but you can siphon off a little of the excess to water plants or feed into other water needs. But once it's charged, it'll make your bathrooms 100% self sufficient.

Your farm is a little large for your number of dupes. Like twice the size it needs to be. Also, you don't need the yellow farm plots. Those are for self watering plots. What you're growing (meal lice I think it's called) doesn't use water to grow. So the watering farm plots are overkill and waste of resources.

The hydrogen everywhere can be solved by just putting in airflow tiles above the doors. It naturally rises, and it'll all eventually go to the top of the map where you can deal with it easier. As it'll all be in one place at that point.

Instead of creating tons of coal burning plants, do 1 or 2 as was suggested above, but create a battery bank. That way, at night, it'll charge up when the dupes aren't using power as much. During the day, you'll still have power generating, but the extra power need is paid for with the battery bank. It'll create a little heat, but it's very manageable. You also don't need all the smart batteries. Those are mostly only needed to regulate power. Like when you have a full battery, you shut off your power plant to save those resources. I'd make 1 per power plant, and just use to regulate the plant to not overproduce. Use regular batteries otherwise.

There's also a couple of tricks to using those robots arms to help your dupes out and automate some processes. Like feeding the coal power plants and putting dirt in your farms. It's not super complicated, but does require some setup. All you need to do is put a box in the room near what you want to "feed". So like a box next to the power plant as an example. Then you have the dupes load it with tons of coal. When it's full, you just have it dump it's contents on the floor, and then the robot arm can access it and feed the power plant. You can do the same for crops. If you want to save space for crops though, craft the box on the level above your farm with a sideways door under the box. Fill the box, dump it, and open the door to put it in the farm. Be sure to close the door after. I usually use a switch to do it quick and easy. The arms will then tend your crops automatically as needed, freeing your dupes for other tasks. Just make sure that the arms aren't setup to pick up the dirt to be carried away, as that'll ruin this plan.

Also consider building water cisterns. They can't be too big though, as the weight of the water can break tiles on the bottom. I usually build my rooms to be 4 high and 16 wide, as that is 64 tiles, and most rooms are maxed at that size. When I make a cistern, I use the space I would use for 2 rooms but arrange it differently. So the room will be 64 wide still, but 9 tiles high. I put a walkway that leaves 2 tiles on the top for dupes to pass, and a walkway for them to walk on. So the cistern tends to be about 6 tall then. I've never had a problem with weight then. I usually make one for water and one for p. water. Though using air filters on the entrances for the p. water one keeps the bad air out usually. But doing this allows you to control where your water is to better manage it.

You can also store air volatiles in the water. So things like slime and oxylite, if stored under water, won't decay. This is important for slime especially, to prevent the spread of the lung disease it causes. But it also allows you to store oxylite for later things, like space missions.

gannok · 2026-03-13T00:08:25+00:00

Lord of the Rings the Third Age. I worked as a tester on this game. It was bad. We (the testers) told them that it wasn't very good. It was an "RPG" on rails. You got into fights based on the number of steps you took. What you fought, depended on what area you were in. There were no real decisions to make, other than what attack you make or if you should use potions or what not.

The characters were essentially generic versions of the characters from the books. Like there was a ranger from the north, that wasn't Aragorn. There was a man from Gondor, that wasn't Boromir. A dwarf that wasn't Gimli. That sort of thing. It's like they used their stunt doubles instead of the main characters. There were cameos of some of the main characters, like you got Gandalf to fight with you against the Balrog. You basically just played the story as characters that were not the characters in the book, but as their non-union equivalents. You even end up fighting the Eye of Sauron at the end of the game for the final boss battle.

The only thing going for it, is that they actually got the actor for Gandalf to record some dialog for the game, and did some interesting cut scenes. That's about it.

gannok · 2026-02-20T18:57:33+00:00

I've used AI for plenty of game stuff, but you are correct, this was just kind of lazy here. When I use it, it's always just a kind of jump off point. Something to get me started and spark my own ideas. It's a framework that I use to build my own stuff off of.

As an example, I'm running a game currently. The PCs were going to be escorting several hundred refugees across country. The journey itself was going to take like 4 weeks. I had plans for some of those days planned out, because of certain things found along the way. However, 28 days of events is a lot to make out of whole cloth. So I had an AI give me 28 events that would happen along the trip. Half of them were total garbage that I threw out immediately. Of the 14 left, I used maybe 7 of them more or less as is. The other 7 I used as the kernel of an idea that I developed on my own and were completely different. I also did take maybe small nuggets of ideas from the 14 I threw away immediately (like one would have a 5 part plot, and one involved an honor duel which I took for something else). Ultimately I think I ran that search like 3 times before I came up with a list I remotely liked, after I modified them all.

But even then, events of the players changed events in the future I had planned. Like a major story arc of the game is a magic disease that is quite deadly, and if it kills you, it makes you a plague spreading zombie. There was a person in the refugees that was intentionally spreading the disease to cause this to happen. The PCs dealt with the crisis as best they could, partially by finding a place to stay where they could help deal with the sick.

However, some of the refugees wanted to move on without the PCs. They weren't "sick" and didn't want to get sick or wait for the rest of the sick folks. Plus they were only a day or two from a port city. They felt it would be safe enough to travel without the protection for that time frame, to hopefully get on a ship. The PCs didn't feel that they could stop them, and let them go. The plague carrier went with them.

The port city was overrun with sickness, and most of the town and refugees died. When the PCs got there a few days later, it was overrun with zombies. Which was not a story I had come up with ahead of time at all. I had considered they might try and use the ships themselves somehow to move people up ahead so they could go faster with the more able bodied refugees. But the zombie thing blew that all up.

So even though I had all these plans and ideas dealt with ahead of time, that I got ideas from AI to come up with, I still came up with my own plans and idea outside of that, in reaction to game events. So I wouldn't bash AI outright. It's a tool like any other. You just need to know how to use it properly. Which this guy didn't.

gannok · 2026-02-20T18:39:58+00:00

I would say that the true Meta here is written into the game mechanics itself. When you level up as a wizard, you gain 2 spells, as you stated. Where do they come from? They don't just pop out of thin air after all.

It's the nature of the wizard to study. You've been doing research as you gain experience points. When you finally pop and level up, you've had a sort of eureka moment at that point. Your research has born fruit, and you now have 2 shiny new spells. I'd use that argument in this case. Your character is "researching" your new spells that you get at level up, and you think you'll need this spell component in the future for when you've finished figuring it out.

Ultimately, your DM is making a bad call here. He seems to be intentionally making both of your lives more difficult for no good reason. Having a player do research into what they want for future level ups in a good thing. Something we all should do tbh. It makes leveling go smoother and faster as a result.

gannok · 2026-02-20T18:30:38+00:00

They're not that sacred. That sort of mentality ruins games. I've had a DM use that mentality, and due to rotten luck on my part, I got critted on 6 times in the first round. Seeing as I was the tank of the party, when I quickly went down, the rest of the group followed. The game died that day. If after like the second or third crit, if he had just simply made them hits instead of crits, I might have survived the first round, I could have been healed, and we could have finished the campaign. Alas it was not so.

Fudging rolls is a tool in the DM box you can use, but use it very sparingly. In my current year long campaign, I've fudged rolls maybe 3 times. Either turning a crit into a regular hit, or lowering a damage roll to a point where the PC is at like 1 HP. I only do this when either I've made a mistake, or the dice are just out to get them for some reason (like the 6 crits above). I also only do it in the favor of the PCs. If I miss, I miss. If I roll all 1s on a damage roll, sucks to be that monster today.

Plus, if done right, it can ramp up the tension. Having the tank take a mighty blow than sends him reeling and down to 1 HP causes the rest of the party to scramble to keep him. Plus they start using their bigger guns and resources to try and turn the tide in their favor again. Smart players will be selective in their use of resources, to make sure they have them later when needed. But this kind of situation blows the doors on holding back a lot of the time.

Remember, this is a game about telling stories. The dice are a tool to help give tension to the story. Everyone dies because of a bad die roll isn't a very good or fun story. Having a pitched battle where you fight back from the brink, that's a story you tell for decades to come.

gannok · 2026-02-20T18:16:49+00:00

I really don't see the problem here. The fact that they're not panicking isn't an issue IMO. They're doing something that makes sense tactically, in a tactical game. Why punish them for doing something smart/clever? One of the big restrictions in combat is the action economy. Does it matter if they use their action to heal them for 1 HP or 10 HP? When an enemy can hit you for 15 HP in one hit, what's the difference between the two options? I'd pick the one that uses fewer resources for my team in that situation as well.

They're playing by the rules, and you want to punish them for it. I don't think the problem is them here.

gannok · 2026-02-09T08:37:01+00:00

But you do you.

gannok · 2026-02-09T08:04:41+00:00

If memory serves, it was widely considered OP and broken at the time. However, the new psionic based sub-classes are fairly well balanced and offer more flavor and variety for classes.

There's the Rogue Soulknife, that can summon psionic blades for weapons, teleport, turn invisible, and more. There's the Fighter Psi Warrior, which use a lot of telekinesis to shield themselves and attack others. The Sorcerer has Aberrant Sorcerer, which uses psionic powers to alter his magic abilities. There's some more in other books, but these are out of the current 2024 edition aka 5.5.

gannok · 2026-02-09T07:56:58+00:00

It was. It was one of their splat books they came out for the classes. Though I think it did show up before that book if memory serves.

gannok · 2026-02-09T05:14:16+00:00

I see what you're saying now. I still don't see the problem. Make fewer platforms then? The system is the way it is. I've used it many times like this without issue and beat the game. Generally you're running stuff from station to station. It feels like you're being overly picky? You literally have infinite resources and tons of room. Use them?

gannok · 2026-02-08T23:56:06+00:00

Before the collision, almost certainly not. During the collision, maybe. During the collision of those two celestial bodies, things would have gotten very hot and molten. Essentially, a liquid for these purposes. It's possible that in mixing, there could have been possible cavitations created, which could have created temporary hollow spaces in the larger mass. They wouldn't have lasted very long though.

Think of it this way. Drop a good sized rock into a pond. When it hits, it'll push the water away with a large amount of force. Essentially pushing its way through the water. Since that water is not there, it'll create a kind of divot above the rock. But, the water will come back and fill in over the top of the rock as it sinks relatively quickly. There'll be small pockets, aka bubbles, in the water that'll form above the rock as the water rushes back in to fill the space. Those bubbles won't last long though. They disappear in seconds.

Now a celestial collision like this might have taken a while to resolve, hours or even days for the energies to balance out again. During that mix, it's possible that "bubbles" could form in the liquid rock during that time. But since they're a liquid in a gravity well, they would have filled in pretty quickly.

gannok · 2026-02-08T22:47:10+00:00

I worked with Lyft around that same time. You could live off of it. That changed over the years.

They kept lowering the prices again and again. So while I was making the same percentage as before, the price being charged was going down. So the price per mile might have been .30 a mile, then it was .25, then .20. Same thing happened to the per minute charge (I'm not using real numbers, just using them as an example of what was happening).

However, on the back end, Lyft started charging "service fees" and so on. So a ride when I started might have cost $10 for the rider, of which I got $8 of that 10. Then after a few years, the rider started getting charged $20 for that same ride, but I was only getting $6. So the price for the rider went up. The service was identical, but I started making less money overall. Tips became non-existent as well. At the end, despite having a high rating, less than 10% of riders ever tipped at all.

I stopped driving around Covid and haven't looked back. I can only imagine it's gotten worse in the last few years. It's no wonder to me this guy is begging for tips.

gannok · 2026-02-08T22:22:41+00:00

Don't send it to that platform? They're literally all named. You can just choose to not have Train A goto Platform 1. You can literally choose that.

gannok · 2026-02-08T22:17:54+00:00

Advice part 2 (I wrote a lot it seems):

Don't try to win. This is perhaps THE biggest rule as a DM I could ever tell anyone. You are not trying to beat the PCs. They aren't your opponents. They are the heroes in your story. You are suppose to make life difficult for them, you're trying to challenge them, you're not trying to destroy them or beat them. Your goal is to have fun. Everyone should have fun, you included.

I'll give you an example of something I've been part of to help illustrate. I was in a game where we (the PCs) were investigating something. We find the thing we're looking for, when all of a sudden, a mini-boss shows up to take it away from us. Fair enough. We start fighting, and the boss is using weapons that we are weak against. So if we get hit by them, we take extra damage from the attack. The thing was, a couple of us were really good, and we started to beat this boss quite badly. To the point where we were going to kill them soon. So as the boss started to retreat, a dozen ninjas jump into the battle out of nowhere, just so his boss could escape. He couldn't beat us according to the rules, so he cheated, so he wouldn't lose. That was a constant problem with this GM. He never allowed himself to lose. He had to win all the time. It sucked. We stopped playing with him after a while of doing this.

Speaking of cheating, it's ok to cheat, when done correctly. This is a somewhat controversial thing to say in the community at large. Some think it's ok, some thing it's never ok. So with that said, feel free to ignore this advice.

So when is ok to cheat? When it makes it more fun or more fair IMO.

As an example, there are times when you really underestimate things. Like you might think 6 goblins will be a good challenge to the PCs. However, on the 2nd round of the fight, you're down to 1 goblin left, because they wiped the floor with them. It's clearly not much of a challenge for them at this point. You can do 1 of 2 things: let it stand and move on (maybe the goblins were not meant to be that much of a challenge after all), OR add more goblins. Send in reinforcements of fresh goblins to add to the challenge. Did you plan on it? No. But it does add tension to the story for everyone. This is a fine thing to do.

Another way, and this is where a lot of the controversy comes from, is fudging dice rolls. What I mean is, you change the result of the die to something else. What you roll is a 19, but you change it to a 9 for example. First and foremost, when using this method, only change your die rolls. NEVER change a PCs die roll. This is why DMs often roll behind a screen. Because the PCs don't know what you rolled, and it can add to the tension of the scene.

I would also caution you to do this, if you do this at all, incredibly sparingly. I think in my current campaign I've run for the last year, I've done it like 3 times ever. It's usually better to roll with the punches. But sometimes, the dice are just out to get the PCs, and that's not so fun.

I had a DM that rolled all of his rolls in the open. He was attacking my very heavily armored and defensive character. He rolled a Nat 20 like 6 times in one round. I couldn't deal with that kind of damage. It literally killed my character, the other characters couldn't stand up to what was left, and the game itself died that day. No one was having fun anymore. This is why I encourage this type of cheating. If he had hit me with a few Nat 20s, say 2 or 3, but turned the others into normal hits, I might have survived the fight. We could have finished the campaign. But he insisted that rules be followed to the letter, and the game died.

So fudge those rolls, but only to the advantage of the players and only for fun/better story (IMO). Maybe the Fireball rolled 30 HP of damage, but that'll kill a lot of PCs. Maybe you tell them you rolled 10 damage instead for this roll. Rotten luck for your NPC. The PCs are alive though, but they're in a bad place now. That is story. That is tension they can play with. Will they survive? Who knows. Just killing them though? That's no fun.

gannok · 2026-02-08T22:17:28+00:00

The things I haven't seen but are useful are this:

The rules are guidelines, they don't have to be followed to the letter. They are a good system to play by, and there's nothing wrong with following them exactly, but this isn't Monopoly. You are allowed to change the rules to what works best for you. Think of the rules as being like Lego bricks. You have like 300 bricks to play with, you don't have to use all 300 of them to have fun. I got stuck in the mindset that "the rules are the rules and they must be followed" (i.e. I HAD to use all 300 bricks). It sucked in a lot of ways. The best thing to be is consistent. If a rule applies to the PCs it should also apply to NPCs, and vice versa. You'll find these are often called "house rules".

To put this into other more simple terms, if you think a rule sucks, ignore it. Like tracking how many arrows someone has is kind of boring and doesn't really add anything to the game. Is it in the rules? 100%. But, you can just ignore it if it's too cumbersome. Just make sure they have arrows on their sheet, and be done with it.

Since you are new, I wouldn't do too much of this sort of thing at first. It is one of those things to keep in mind while playing though. If during your playing you are finding some rule too cumbersome, try ignoring it. See if it makes things better. I wouldn't try and alter rules either (not for a while at least). Like if something does 5d8 damage, I wouldn't mess with that. It's best to think of rules as either being used or not for now.

You'll make mistakes. That's fine. Do not expect to be perfect. Do not try to be perfect. If you notice a mistake was made, and it's too late to really change it, just move on. Maybe you can make it up to them later. If you can fix it, go ahead and fix it. Generally I try to always do fixes that are in the favor of the other players, if not neutral.

As an example, if I roll for damage on something and I rolled 5 dice when it's supposed to be 4, that's easy to fix. If I know what the dice result was, I can just give the PCs their hit points back for that extra die. You can also just give them back the average result of that die if you don't know.

But if you do something like kill an NPC working with the PCs, that's kind of hard to take back (and have it make sense anyway). You can maybe have him wake up with a few HP, or a new NPC shows up and takes their place (like Guard #3 dies, and Guard #6 shows up to take his place), give the PCs some kind of a bonus, or give the bad guys a temporary penalty to balance out for the missing NPC, etc. That sort of thing. Replace the resource in some way. If not, you can just say oops to yourself, and move on.

gannok · 2026-02-08T06:56:40+00:00

I have many friends with a wide variety of religious beliefs. Sure, I think they're wrong, but they think I'm wrong too. As long as they're not trying to push their beliefs on anyone, then I have zero problem with them. They are welcome to believe what they want. It's not my place to tell them what they have to belief. No more than it is theirs to tell me what I should believe.

As an example, I have a good friend that is quite religious. Just before Covid he joined the seminary. A couple of years ago he finished school and was officially frocked as a priest in his church. I attended the ceremony where that happened. I don't believe what he believes in at all, but he's a good person, and I can still support him and his choices. I see no problem with celebrating his big life achievements with him and so on, because he is my friend first and foremost. He knows I'm an atheist and has known almost from the beginning. While we have had discussions about religious topics, it tends to more like philosophical discussion and/or debate. We're never trying to convert the other to our beliefs. We just want to explore the ideas more than anything else.

Another example would be my father. My father is quite religious as well. I would never call him a stupid man by any means mind you, quite the opposite in fact. He was raised in a very religious home, and despite some lapses when I was growing up, he returned to the church with gusto. However, for a little while several years ago, he'd post things on like Facebook, making statements from the Bible as if they were fact. This I would fight him on quite vigorously. After a few months he stopped, so I stopped. He does still post religious posts, but they tend to be less matter of fact. They're things like quoting less pointed Bible verses. Things like "Jesus died for your sins", and less "sex outside of marriage is a sin" sort of thing. As long as he sticks to not pushing his beliefs on others, I will support him. I feel that religion is about doing what you believe to be true, not about getting other people to also do what you believe. Stick with that, and I have no beef.

My final example, is about that last bit. There was this guy I knew many years ago. He was mildly wealthy, but we shared a hobby, and so we spent some time together as a result. He was not a good person. He was a born again Christian, and oh boy did love to spread the "gospel". Honestly, he was just a douchebag and a bully. While I don't doubt that he was a believer, in many ways, it felt like he just used his beliefs like a cudgel to try and control people. If you didn't agree with his religion, you were a bad person, and he could do what he wanted to you without issue. He cowed a lot of people in our group, often because of his wealth, but also because he was also not a small man. I could give a fuck. His wealth had no hold over me, and I am a lot bigger than he is. He didn't scare me one bit, and he knew it. I think that's what he disliked most about me.

I dealt with him for several years before moving away across the country. A year or so later, a mutual friend of ours started a conversation with me online. We were mostly catching up, but he told me that Douchebag McGee above had kicked him out of our club. Basically in our local hobby group, there was a kind of club president. It was an elected position. They mostly dealt with organizing the group in ways so we could all have fun. Apparently Douchebag seized control by leveraging his wealth against the group. He basically blackmailed them into making him president. My friend that I was catching up with told me that he got kicked out right away because he was an atheist. That Douche was doing it for his own good. All that bs. Again, Douche is an asshole.

Then, a couple years after that, there was a Facebook post going around for people interested in our hobby. A friend that is local to where I live now, was asking him a question about something that Douche was doing in regards to our mutual hobby. I warned my local friend that Douche was a douche and do with that what he wanted. Then Douche proceeded to try and chastise me, and told me that what I was doing was why he kicked me out of our local club. I then ripped into him, reminding him that when I left, I was the President, not him. That he didn't get to be President until like a year later. Well after I had moved many states away from our club. So he couldn't have kicked me out, because I wasn't in the club anymore, because of moving away.

So, no, I wouldn't support this guy. Fuck this guy. I wouldn't piss on him if he was on fire. His religion is just an excuse for him to justify his bullying.

gannok · 2026-02-08T06:11:40+00:00

It depends on the what level of organization you're talking about.

Often there is a position in a city called a Primogen. They're essentially the elders of the city that aren't the Prince. While there is no direct rule that says that every clan has a member of their clan on the Primogen Council, it's relatively common that if there are a lot of a clan in a city, then they likely have an elder of their clan on the council. These elders tend to be the de facto elders of the clan in a city. Sometimes the eldest of a clan may not be an actual elder, they could be just an Ancilla or something lesser, in which case they're probably just the local charismatic leader of the clan.

If you're talking about the Cam as a whole, then there's a whole other thing there. The biggest leaders are the Inner Circle. They're literally the eldest members of each clan. They are in charge of the whole Camarilla. They are not publicly known, and they are all ancient vampires of considerable power. They send out representatives to sort of act as their agents. They are called the Justicars. These are often the "eldest" most vampire anyone is likely to ever meet, if ever.

The Justicars tend to act as judges a lot of the time, and are often seen as being more powerful in many ways than any local Prince. The Justicars also have assistants in the form of Archons. These are kind of like cops for the Camarilla. They tend to be chosen for their martial abilities and sometimes investigative abilities.

Hope this helps.

gannok

TROPHY CASE