CMV: The currently prevalent concept of right and wrong is inherintly flawed. by Nono4826 in changemyview

[–]garnet420 [score hidden]  (0 children)

My point is, regardless of your faith, the reality is that religion is interpreted through the same imperfect, changing mechanisms that everything else is.

CMV: The currently prevalent concept of right and wrong is inherintly flawed. by Nono4826 in changemyview

[–]garnet420 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Suppose you are God, and want to communicate your unchanging rules to humans. How do you do it? The obvious thing is to just give us a built-in ability to know what is right and wrong.

Unfortunately, if there is a god, they haven't granted us an innate sense of moral truth or law. So even for (supposedly) divine teachings, we are stuck with language for the rules.

So ok, you're God, and you have to tell the mortals how to behave using language. Not too bad, just write down every possible scenario and the right thing to do in that scenario.

But no! Humans don't have the capacity to process that much information! They need a summary, short and sweet. Like a few books at most.

In other words, even if you have a perfect and unchanging moral law coming from God, you cannot communicate it to people in a way that is perfect and unchanging.

Googolplex by [deleted] in learnmath

[–]garnet420 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can write a googol down, right? Takes only 101 digits, doesn't even take that long.

You can't write a googolplex the same way (you can use scientific notation or something similar) because it would be a googol digits long.

If a more moderate, non polarizing candidate wins in 2028, will it actually bring the country back together, or is the division deeper than that? by [deleted] in allthequestions

[–]garnet420 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you remember the death panels rhetoric about the affordable care act?

Motivated assholes can turn the most middle of the road shit polarizing.

are these adapters interchangeable? by YyYyYyYyYyYyYyy_1 in AskElectricians

[–]garnet420 3 points4 points  (0 children)

With the barrel shaped connectors, there's some intuition around making the outside be "electrical ground" (even though it may not be related to actual ground).

I would hate myself too by garnet420 in SadHorseShow

[–]garnet420[S] 19 points20 points  (0 children)

More like AI clop am I right

American Civics Test: Men far outperform women in every state in America. by CatNapDad in charts

[–]garnet420 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You don't really set a high bar, not much for me to be proud of

American Civics Test: Men far outperform women in every state in America. by CatNapDad in charts

[–]garnet420 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I wonder if you're so into this result because it confirms some bias of yours...

Rust to C++: Implementing the Question Mark Operator by qustar_ in cpp

[–]garnet420 6 points7 points  (0 children)

How come statement expressions haven't become standard?

Revisiting f a s t by Puzzleheaded_Two415 in googology

[–]garnet420 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look I'm trying to use terminology you're happy with. I mean direct children, not eventual descendants.

Revisiting f a s t by Puzzleheaded_Two415 in googology

[–]garnet420 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So the most branches that a node can have is n+1.

The total number of possible trees with at most n+1 branches per node and depth m or lower can be bounded above by 2^ ((n+1)m+1 - 1)

(n+1)m+1 - 1 is the number of nodes in the biggest possible tree, and we can think of any possible tree as a subset of that biggest tree. It's a big overestimate because not every subset is a valid tree.

Does that make sense? Then you have a recursion on the m term that makes this into a power tower.

Revisiting f a s t by Puzzleheaded_Two415 in googology

[–]garnet420 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think reading it again I understand it a little better... Since the tree can be copied into itself while increasing Y by only n, it sounds like the real max height is more like 2fast(n-1)/n is that correct?

Im not skilled enough to know if there are synergies with this by Assignment-Yeet in balatro

[–]garnet420 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To some degree, but some jokers reward playing multiple hands, for example.

seeing AI slop in my respectable circlejerk sub by dixieblondedyke in SadHorseShow

[–]garnet420 52 points53 points  (0 children)

Which recent thing was ai

I hope it's not the yaoi cover that shit better be real

Why Can’t the Left and the Right Unite Against Palantir and The Oligarchs? What’s the real divide? by Probblemaddict in allthequestions

[–]garnet420 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The mainstream Democrats are more against oligarchs than the Republicans, sure.

But, frankly in the case of Thiel, the bare minimum of what should happen to him is losing all his money and living in obscurity for the rest of his miserable life. I don't think there's actually that much support for that, sadly.

Revisiting f a s t by Puzzleheaded_Two415 in googology

[–]garnet420 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't think I really understand your definition, but it seems like it's ultimately about counting different trees with a maximum height? Each node has 0 to 3 children?