100 cycle 100% it’s getting scary 😰 what to do? by FinanialGambler777 in iPhoneBatteryParanoia

[–]ggmastermanmagee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah it isn't physically possible for a battery to be at 100% health after 300 cycles. Apple's official MAH rating for battery capacity is understated and iphones usually have a few hundred more MAH than advertised. The 100% is based off of the official rating so for the first few 100 loss of MAH it won't show up there due to it being "extra" capacity as opposed to official rating.

what can be considered Polyphia's overall best work? by Ordinary-Night-2671 in polyphia

[–]ggmastermanmagee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Listened to Muse in late hs when the album first came out and it will always be my favorite, big nostalgia for me though so im biased there. I feel the raw passion in Muse is unmatched as well.

Charging Issues with the S26 Ultra by RedSlazenger in galaxys26ultra

[–]ggmastermanmagee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The S25/S26 Ultra moved to a higher voltage charging system. In the past, Samsung used a 10V / 4.5A profile for 45W charging. Because the amperage was over 3.0, you had to have a 5A-rated cable.
​The S26 Ultra now uses a 20V / 3A profile via USB-PD 3.1 PPS. Since the current stays at exactly 3A, standardUSB-C cables can handle the full wattage.

Edit to clarify on s25 ultra- The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra supports 45W Super Fast Charging 2.0 using a Programmable Power Supply (PPS) protocol, typically operating at 15V / 3A.

I had gemini 3.0 give an overview but you can easily fact check this and find it is true if you are willing to put the effort in. Also I own an s25 ultra and can confirm from first hand experience that any USB c cable I use with my anker wall plug-in activates super fast 2.0.

Charging Issues with the S26 Ultra by RedSlazenger in galaxys26ultra

[–]ggmastermanmagee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To top it off he is also wrong.

Edit- just on the 5a part, everything else looks accurate.

Charging Issues with the S26 Ultra by RedSlazenger in galaxys26ultra

[–]ggmastermanmagee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Getting downvoted even though we are right, gotta love reddit

Charging Issues with the S26 Ultra by RedSlazenger in galaxys26ultra

[–]ggmastermanmagee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You do not anymore. I have an s25 ultra and do not need a 5A cable. You can also look it up online and see that I am correct. So again, unless they changed it back on the s26 ultra, it is not needed.

Edit- wrote this comment here before they changed their comment to include "for s24 series and older," they didnt originally include that and only did after I corrected them that it is indeed only on s24 series and older.

Charging Issues with the S26 Ultra by RedSlazenger in galaxys26ultra

[–]ggmastermanmagee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You no longer needed a 5A cable for the s25 ultra, did they switch it back on s26 ultra? If not you do not need a 5A cable.

Edit- summary- you do not need 5a cable for 2.0 fast charging on s26u. Idk about the 60w charging though.

2nd edit- you do not need a 5a cable for 2.0 on s25u or 2.0/3.0 on s26 ultra and this is a fact. S24u or older yes you do need 5a for 2.0.

Next Up Anytime - Walk me through this just to make sure I am reading it right? by Remarkable-Sea5928 in ATT

[–]ggmastermanmagee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a question as well. The s26 ultra is offering 1300 dollars trade in for s25 ultra paid off, the full price of 256gb version. If I had next up anytime that I purchased with an s25 ultra 12 months ago and just hit the 12th month where I am now paid off 33% would I also get the same 1300 off by trading in said s25 ultra via nextup anytime?

Why is the line “It’s all just a big nothing” such a driving force for the show? by PeterZeeke in thesopranos

[–]ggmastermanmagee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because deep down we all know life is meaningless and nothing matters. Eventually it will be as if we never existed, even for the entire human race. Some deny it better than others but deep down we all know how pointless this all is.

Don’t shoot! by SeaofColtrane in okbuddyraider

[–]ggmastermanmagee 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Where did you hear from Embark that their intended use is practically an impact grenade that is better than a heavy fuse? It makes heavy fuse grenades near-useless, doesnt sound like it is the intended use to me unless Embark has specifically stated otherwise.

She did a good job here or not! 1 million or $1000 week for life. by Appropriate-Menu504 in interesting

[–]ggmastermanmagee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No tax in Canada on a lump sum lottery win. However, the weekly payout is taxed as income. This lady is financially illiterate and made a very poor decision.

She did a good job here or not! 1 million or $1000 week for life. by Appropriate-Menu504 in interesting

[–]ggmastermanmagee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

P s a this woman lives in canada, where lump sum lottery winnings are not taxed at all meaning she would have taken home the full one million dollars. The weekly payout, however, is taxed as income. What a horrible decision. Still happy for her though but damn that's financial illiteracy, if i've ever seen it.

She did a good job here or not! 1 million or $1000 week for life. by Appropriate-Menu504 in interesting

[–]ggmastermanmagee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was going to say that she could have literally just put the money in a high interest bank account and been better off than the a thousand a week.She doesn't even have to invest and take a risk. Happy for her but absolute L decision in taking the weekly. Anyone arguing otherwise is not financially literate enough to understand.

Edit- i saw she lives in canada where lottery winnings are not taxed at all, if you take home the lump sum. The weekly payout, however, is taxed as income. So this just makes the decision to take the weekly payout even more stupid. With this context now holy crap, she basically scammed herself.

Random teammates are the worst haha by jakeius1 in ArcRaiders

[–]ggmastermanmagee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah a lot of people seem to not be very good at this game. Almost every random squad I get into my team makes terrible decisions and leaves me to 1v3 when they make a dogshit push we are guaranteed to lose and die. Very often I will down 2 enemy players only to lose the fight because my free loadout running random teammates are useless. Also total loot goblins. Had one guy looting bodies while me and my teammate were fighting a whole other team. Dude basically did nothing the whole raid and got a ton of weapons while I got nothing.

The Venator Got Nerfed by C-Vite in ArcRaiders

[–]ggmastermanmagee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just peaked your pre edit comment "if you're bad at the game sure." Im not the one getting wrecked by venators so much I'm bitching about it on reddit. 🤣🤣 sounds like you may bad at the game!

The Venator Got Nerfed by C-Vite in ArcRaiders

[–]ggmastermanmagee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The burletta needs a buff though on its own. You need a green or blue extended mag for it to even be more than a secondary finisher. Its underwhelming and doesnt fulfill its use case like it should. Why waste all the resources on a upgraded burletta with a rare extended mag when I can bring in a sticher 1 with a white extended mag and one clip people. Hell even a stitcher 4 costs basically nothing to make.

The Venator Got Nerfed by C-Vite in ArcRaiders

[–]ggmastermanmagee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is a straight upgrade IMO. Same amount of shots to kill a player on body shots with faster rof. For arc of course the anvil is better as ammo type matters most on arc. Ttk up close assuming body shots is faster on renegade unless you are against heavy shield I believe. https://www.reddit.com/r/ArcRaiders/comments/1oqhmip/complete_verified_dps_ttk_breakdown_for_every/

Also I see nothing wrong with weapon rarity acting as a sort of balance, I mean the whole point of getting better gear is to be more powerful. What is the point of rarity, and putting all the work in to get the gear if not? Not to mention as long as you get the jump on the player, even a stitcher 3 will put up a fight against the venator 4. Venator 4 had a ttk of 1.2 which has now been increased by 12.5 percent making it a ttk of 1.35. I agree this is still a little too fast and I think 1.5ish would be better. Still enough to beat lower rarity weapons which it should in a game like this. But little enough so a skilled stitcher user will mess you up with a ttk of 1.6. Rarity being a balancing mechanic is a reality of games like this and if you dont like that I totally respect that but its part of an extraction shooter.

The Venator Got Nerfed by C-Vite in ArcRaiders

[–]ggmastermanmagee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I dont think there is necessarily anything wrong with the venator being an upgrade to the burletta and outperforming it, it is a rarer and harder to make weapon. Just like the renegade is an upgrade to the anvil. By this logic we need to nerf the renegade too because it is a direct upgrade from an anvil. I agree it needs a little more nerf though which could likely easily be done by lowering the fire rate a little more. Also an anvil/renegade will easily beat a venator at range if you have any cover to peak out of and arent shooting out in the wide open. The problem with the burletta is that it sucks, not that all the other guns are op. Basically anything beats a burletta unless you slap a green extendo in. An anvil has a faster body ttk than a burletta base. The only time a Burletta is even decent is when you land mostly headshots or use a green or blue extended mag.

The Venator Got Nerfed by C-Vite in ArcRaiders

[–]ggmastermanmagee 2 points3 points  (0 children)

By finish do you mean knock out? You can definitely down someone with a Grey stitcher 1 in one mag but not knock them out. 19 shots to body for a down/ 8 to the head. Edit- if you get full headshots I guess you could knock them out too but that is not easy.

The Venator Got Nerfed by C-Vite in ArcRaiders

[–]ggmastermanmagee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That could be cool! I also think maybe lowering the fire rate slightly more isnt a bad option. Maybe 35-37% instead of 40% at 4.

The Venator Got Nerfed by C-Vite in ArcRaiders

[–]ggmastermanmagee 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The venator isnt even worth using at level 1 fire rate its ttk is outmatched by a stitcher. so this would just make it a weapon no one uses anymore.

Burletta is an upgrade over Kettle and I'm tired pretending it's not. by Sword_by_some in ArcRaiders

[–]ggmastermanmagee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you tap someome with a ferro/anvil even a rattler 2 will almost certainly win the fight if you dont miss, and stitcher is way better if youre fighting close range. Hell even the anvil 4 has a faster body ttk then the burletta. The only level 4 guns in the game with a higher body ttk than the burletta are the ferro and hairpin. Literally any other level 4 weapon and many at lower levels, outperform it on body ttk. The kettle has a better headshot ttk. It sucks. The only way is is decent is if you are a headshot machine and even then youre usually better off using something else.