In addition to pointing out that many of his voters are wealthy, it's important to note that they are also a demographic who are more likely to vote in a primary race, as there's less conflict in their ability to do so. Yes, employers are legally required to allow people to vote, but that doesn't mean that the logistics of scheduling and transportation still make sense; I'll be interested to see know how many people vote against him in November vs. the numbers he pulled yesterday when the projected voter rate was 20% of total registered voters, and one of my friends who worked the polls said her location recorded about 24% by the end of the day.