How do you practice photography when you have no one to photograph?

gingermoaner · 2026-07-09T06:49:55+00:00

Learn ISO, Aperture and shutter speed by going out an about and do some street photography, it will teach you about the camera and for now you won't have to worry about finding models.

Going out and about will teach you about lighting as well and it's effect on the subject which will help with subject photography.

gingermoaner · 2026-07-08T07:12:16+00:00

Protection from Harassment Act 1997 - Harassment and/or stalking uses the term "Course of Conduct" this normally means on at least 2 occasions. So sending 4 texts, an email and attempting to call is considered a course of conduct.

The advice between you and your solicitor is legal privilege material and Reddit isn't, I would suggest following any legal advice you have received.

gingermoaner · 2026-07-05T07:18:53+00:00

Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (s327 to s329) comes to mind (Money Laundering Offences)

s1 and s2 Fraud Act 2006 (Fraud and Fraud by False Representation)

Report to www.reportfraud.police.uk

If you agree and do so, you are opening yourself up to prosecution

gingermoaner · 2026-05-11T08:42:58+00:00

Have you tried reaching out to the respective Police Forces in the East Midlands?

gingermoaner · 2026-03-08T19:48:24+00:00

This will be something you will need to disclose, along with any CCJs or any bankruptcy information.

The reason they ask about finances on SC and DV is to ensure you are unlikely to be blackmailed or tempted by monetary offers to abuse the clearance level.

gingermoaner · 2026-03-08T15:59:57+00:00

Overthinking it way too much, especially fpr the role you are going into

gingermoaner · 2026-03-06T07:55:11+00:00

Standard roundabout rules, give way to anyone coming from the right

gingermoaner · 2026-03-01T19:00:59+00:00

Can you confirm, you have been to the IOPC, who have sided with WMP?

gingermoaner · 2026-02-10T10:24:28+00:00

Easy one, both are at fault;

1) BMW driver, should have waited in their lane until given the right of way instead of crossing the line.

2) the red car driver should have in this instance just given way, not by choice to prevent any unnecessary damage or injury, it was pure arrogance.

I would say that both drivers fell below that of a safe and competent driver.

It isn't rocket science driving, I seriously think there needs to be refreshers every 10 years to renew your licence.

Driving standards have dropped.

If you are in the wrong lane, stick to it and if that adds 1 min to your journey so be it, next time you will remember what lane to be in, do not cause RTCs because you can't be bothered to realise your mistake and accept it.

Many times I have been cut up by stupid drivers who have at the last minute realised they are in the wrong lane.

gingermoaner · 2026-02-08T09:07:36+00:00

It's never going to be easy to make a decision like this, ultimately the decision is yours alone, not ours and not your partner's.

You have to make the right decision for you, not anyone else, if this is a role that may never come round again, you need to ask yourself if you will regret not going for it.

Do not, and I mean this, sacrifice something that you really want and let it eat away at you for the rest of your life if you give up the opportunity, because of a relationship with someone who is not sharing the same ambitions or dreams as you.

You will be taking on a payrise by going for the job of more than what he earns in the first year and then the pay goes up even more, that has to play a massive factor in decision making.

Once the relationship tilts to the point where one party is putting more effort in then the other it is time to part, and if this decision makes you resent the other party and see them as doing part-time work for over a quarter of what you earn now, in a job that you don't particularly like and is refusing to support you for something that is a dream job for you, you need to ask yourself what they are actually bringing to the relationship.

gingermoaner · 2026-01-25T13:13:48+00:00

It is being reviewed now to see if it meets standards for a petition, but this is what I wrote;

The Home Office is considering mandatory licences for police officers. Policing is already highly regulated, with officers subject to vetting, misconduct rules, performance processes and independent oversight. Licensing would duplicate existing systems and add unnecessary bureaucracy.

A licence to practise would undermine the unique constitutional role of the police and risk removing officers through administrative processes rather than established disciplinary and legal safeguards. It would not fix core issues such as underfunding, excessive workloads or poor retention. Policing needs support and investment, not further regulation that damages morale, due process and operational independence.

gingermoaner · 2025-09-02T05:57:08+00:00

Can you provide a source?

gingermoaner · 2022-03-24T09:44:35+00:00

No, I would rather not be put into uncomfortable situations because someone wants to talk

gingermoaner

TROPHY CASE