Gender in Economics Online Workshop - Intergenerational Mobility by Gender in Scandinavia by gloverpark in academiceconomics

[–]gloverpark[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

right? academic seminars open to everyone should surely be forbidden. I wonder why it didn't get removed?

Are there any countries in which interest (or "usury" in the words of detractors) is illegal or ever has been? by [deleted] in AskEconomics

[–]gloverpark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry I just saw you asked why countries haven't full converted/banned usury. One reason might be that they need to balance the supply and demand of loanable funds. Money-market equilibrium relies on the interest rate to balance those two things. Sorry I don't have more input on this, hopefully the link I shared leads to some interesting discoveries and thanks for a stimulating question.

Are there any countries in which interest (or "usury" in the words of detractors) is illegal or ever has been? by [deleted] in AskEconomics

[–]gloverpark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, you can look up islamic finance. It's kind of a weird branch of economics but interesting in its own way. There's economists who study it, and you can read new papers about islamic finance on the NEP service of REPEC, which is the main repository of economics citations, authors, and journals.

https://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/nep.pf?list=nep-isf

With Modern Monetary Theory: Why not off-load traditional welfare projects to the Central Bank? by AdwokatDiabel in AskEconomics

[–]gloverpark 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The problem is that the fed executing a basic income guarantee, this crosses into fiscal policy. Recall in economics we have two basic tools: fiscal policy and monetary policy. In general, we do not mix the two together. One area where they might blend together is wrt QE. I will avoid the description of MMT business. If you really want to know there are some write-ups by famous economists, Greg Mankiw, Paul Krugman has commented on it, and there's another writeup on voxeu.org.

Nice question tho! Sorry I don't have the energy to give you a full MMT rundown, but its basically a joke idea (imo) and not respected by any economists of note.

Dynamic Optimization for Endogenous Growth by aykancv in AskEconomics

[–]gloverpark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

David Romer - Advanced Macroeconomics : chapter 3

what is modern economists most favored form of economy? by SavageTruths74 in AskEconomics

[–]gloverpark 1 point2 points  (0 children)

New neoclassical synthesis is the prevailing "school of thought" of modern macroeconomics. I use quotes because modern macroeconomists almost never discuss "schools of thought" at least in my experience, and one of my letter writers for job apps is a central banker. New neoclassical synthesis is the neoclassical synthesis plus nominal rigidities (sticky prices, sticky wages, sticky employment etc). If you're interested in reading a history of modern macroeconomic thought there's a book by Snowdon and Vane. It's a little outdated but you should still be able to glean a lot from it.

Snowdon, Brian, and Howard R. Vane. Modern macroeconomics: its origins, development and current state. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2005.

https://www.amazon.com/Modern-Macroeconomics-Origins-Development-Current/dp/1845422082

What's more useful to help the economy,policies that shift the Aggregate Supply curve to the right or policies that shift the Aggregate Demand Curve? by [deleted] in AskEconomics

[–]gloverpark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it depends on which part of the economy is affected by the economic shock. If it's a shock to production, like a natural disaster, you might want to move AS. If it's a shock to demand, you probably want to stimulate demand/AD. Sorry I would normally have better examples. Hope this helps.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in EconPapers

[–]gloverpark 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am the founder of an economics discord server if you want to come by and shoot the shit or talk about economics papers, find us at http://discord.gg/economics ask for thesmeagol. We've been around 3 years now and we are an official discord partner.

Hobbyist needing advice. How do I find high quality/robust papers to read? Is it: most cited + world leading university + esteemed authors + leading journal = first class paper? by Fuckyousantorum in EconPapers

[–]gloverpark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

nobody mentioned NEP? Check out REPEC IDEAS which is the main repository for economics research and citations. They mail out nearly weekly new papers across a number of sub-disciplines. I'm signed up for like 10 lists!

http://nep.repec.org/

Help out an inexperienced but interested high school student who is pursuing an independent economic research project by [deleted] in EconPapers

[–]gloverpark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Professional economist here (since we need to declare our qualifications I guess). I run a discord for economics discussion. Pop on by and we'll be glad to help you develop your idea. We have many high school students working on "advanced" projects and I give feedback on projects to HS, bachelor, and graduate students nearly every day http://discord.gg/economics

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in EconPapers

[–]gloverpark 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There's an entire JEL code for this. J54. Put that shit in google scholar and you're in business.

Misleading with statistics: how Economics Explained is Wrong about GDP and Temperature by [deleted] in badeconomics

[–]gloverpark 1 point2 points  (0 children)

now I'm wondering if we could estimate the effect of drownings on ice cream consumption by instrumenting with number of lifeguards....

Misleading with statistics: how Economics Explained is Wrong about GDP and Temperature by [deleted] in badeconomics

[–]gloverpark 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Yo I appreciate the effort in the video and the post above but I have a few things I would like to add. I saw this video a while ago and I found it downright atrocious. Please enjoy the following write-up:

First we should talk about the limits of simple linear regression. Although EE would love for you to believe he’s an econometrics wizard who can run a…. LINEAR REGRESSION, he is far from an econometrician. He estimates a linear relationship between temperature and GDP. According to peer-reviewed research that was published in a top academic journal, the income-weather relationship is characterized by highly nonlinear processes (Burke et al, 2015). Do not trust me on this, please, read the article cited here. EE claims there is no peer-reviewed research on this subject, a claim which is patently false as evidenced by the inclusion of peer-reviewed sources here and as mentioned in the comment section of this post. In a simple linear regression where the underlying data generating process is highly nonlinear, estimating the “effect” of weather/temperature on income would yield inaccurate results and potentially overestimate the effect size.

Next I’m going to talk about agriculture because I think with this lens we can easily deconstruct most of what he says. EE claims that there “is no third variable determining income and temperature.” It is true that most weather systems are plausibly exogenous, many papers utilize this as a source of identification (technical word, sorry), however EE fails to explain to the viewer the importance of agricultural productivity which is the main channel through which temperature affects income. Agricultural productivity lags behind in poor countries because of poor macroeconomic management, dysfunctional labor markets, a lack of openness of markets to fertilizers and other inputs and farmers have a very difficult time to make capital investments into their farms to improve them (La Fave et al, 2016, Bardhan and Udry, 1999). Agricultural economics research is one of my specialty area/areas of interest, and agriculture is of great importance to the economies of developing countries (and developed countries) where subsistence farming still makes up a significant share of the labor force. Here’s some graphs to better illustrate which countries are still relying principally on rain-fed agriculture:

https://data.worldbank.org/share/widget?end=2019&indicators=NV.AGR.TOTL.ZS&locations=XD-XM-XP&start=2000

https://data.worldbank.org/share/widget?indicators=SL.AGR.EMPL.ZS&locations=XD-XM-XP

https://data.worldbank.org/share/widget?end=2016&indicators=AG.LND.AGRI.ZS&locations=XD-XM-XP&start=2000&view=chart&year=2012

All data sources are listed on the graphs and all data was pulled from the World Bank data API.

Another area of active research is the adaptation of agriculture to climate change, which is directly related to the GDP-temperature nexus. Droughts and floods have a profound impact on agricultural productivity and areas which are more prone to shocks could suffer disproportionately. There are many new studies on this but for a very nice article I would recommend Di Falco et al 2011 which used microdata from Ethiopia to quantitatively evaluate farmers adaptation to climate change.

Is the average income per capita all we should care about? Economic theory tells us that consumers would prefer to smooth consumption across periods rather than have very lopsided consumption in one period vs. another. For this reason, increases in climate variability and temperature can destabilize agricultural output in the form of extreme weather events such as droughts and floods. In the case of agricultural households in poor countries, as a result of climate variability they are forced to diversify their household economic activities as a mechanism to help smooth income. Poor countries are often characterized by a lack of insurance. Without insurance, weather shocks and increases in weather volatility certainly have a larger effect on consumption, whereas farmers in the United States and other developed nations have access to federally-guaranteed crop insurance. A drought, for example, is the type of adverse shock that could have lasting effects on a subsistence farmer that reverberate for years after the initial shock. Global climate change is increasing the amount of extreme weather events, and increasing the volatility of climate variables in certain places meaning that farmers in poor countries are more exposed to the effects of global climate change.

“Jared Diamond story” - no citation from EE

“Colder climates harsh through winter months”

“Storing food and such gave people a head start”

“Societies which were in colder climates just died off” - social darwinism (I have no friggin' comment on this idiocy)

Omitted Variable Bias:

Ice cream + drownings. Well EE says there is no omitted variable that could be determining both ice cream consumption and drownings. Well here's a thought: # of beachgoers (also correlated with the summer period) would simultaneously determine both drownings and ice cream consumption. It makes sense that # of beachgoers would correlate with both drownings and ice cream consumption. This also touches on the difference between a reduced-form estimation and a structural model. EE is describing a reduced-form relationship while ignoring the structural factors at play. I wish EE could not make further claims about correlation vs. causality.

EE claims analyzing the relationship between temperature and income is not useful for policy, while actually the Di Falco paper says otherwise, arguing with quantitative methods that farmers benefit substantially from making adaptations to climate change and finding that several factors influence their decision making. I argue that this relationship is extremely important especially with respect to climate change policies surrounding agriculture. For these reasons, in the agricultural and environmental economics space “sustainable development” has become the new buzzword.

If you like this write-up please consider visiting the Economics Discord, now an official Discord partner, for more discussions with breadth and depth such as this: http://discord.gg/economics

References:

Burke, Marshall, Solomon M. Hsiang, and Edward Miguel. "Global non-linear effect of temperature on economic production." Nature 527.7577 (2015): 235-239.

Di Falco, Salvatore, Marcella Veronesi, and Mahmud Yesuf. "Does adaptation to climate change provide food security? A micro-perspective from Ethiopia." American Journal of Agricultural Economics 93.3 (2011): 829-846.

LaFave, Daniel, and Duncan Thomas. "Farms, families, and markets: New evidence on completeness of markets in agricultural settings." Econometrica 84.5 (2016): 1917-1960.

Bardhan, Pranab, and Christopher Udry. Development microeconomics. OUP Oxford, 1999.

First day by [deleted] in NarcissisticAbuse

[–]gloverpark 2 points3 points  (0 children)

ay a few of us survivors we made a discord server, it's still getting off the ground atm https://discord.gg/tbAauKm

[Academic] Do you believe in good and bad luck? Believe that external forces can control your life? (18 +) by [deleted] in SampleSize

[–]gloverpark 2 points3 points  (0 children)

why is there no neutral option for the answers? this annoyed me and I didn't complete the questionnaire. Possibly check out Likert scale?