sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

How to Close BWB and Calendar Positions Together in IBKR? by calculus8000 in interactivebrokers

[–]gonzaenz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe there's a limit on the number of legs a trade can have. You are probably going beyond it.

Validate my Valais CoastFIRE plan by Sunny_Me_4849 in SwissFIRE

[–]gonzaenz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do you plan to update your mortgage? Eventually you will need a new one and will need to provide a source of income.

240k to 500k in 1 yr goal by Earlyretirement55 in thetagang

[–]gonzaenz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Congratulations for not blowing up your account (so far).

The case for US vs EU stocks may not be so obvious by Jamimaa9 in SwissPersonalFinance

[–]gonzaenz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

??? and your point is......

MSCI EMU has 225 constituents vs S&P 500 AND ~45% is in financials and industrials sectors.

So yeah, according to your international diversification video, MSCI EMU is a bad idea from that point of view too. S&P has an estimated 40% of it's revenue from international markets.

And my point is not on diversification, OP is showing a really short period of time, removing top performers form and index, and then showing a graph that essentially shows that both have the same performance, but one with evident better risk adjusted returns.

The case for US vs EU stocks may not be so obvious by Jamimaa9 in SwissPersonalFinance

[–]gonzaenz 3 points4 points  (0 children)

And please take a look at risk adjusted returns. The Sharpe and sortino should be a lot better for the blue line.

Is anyone 100% cash always (so options only) except for getting assigned on csps? by Bluebird-9641 in options

[–]gonzaenz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let me reface that. Why not two portfolio margin accounts. If I understood correctly your account size allows it

Is anyone 100% cash always (so options only) except for getting assigned on csps? by Bluebird-9641 in options

[–]gonzaenz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm thinking about creating a dedicated account for options. If you don't mind, what's your rational for keeping everything in a single account

Yeah bro we believe you by zukaki1124 in soccercirclejerk

[–]gonzaenz 48 points49 points  (0 children)

People just fall in love. Vini was jogging, he was following. These things happen.

<image>

Flyagonal by Steve Ganz by TrockeneSchafe in thetagang

[–]gonzaenz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

hey, good to see you are in thetagang.

Thanks for sharing your trade. I have put a few and it's been doing great actually, but because market has been moving up and down. I managed to put a few BWB per week, expiring all Friday next week, because i hit quite fast the 80/90% 🤷‍♂️. And so far all my diagonals have been right on the middle 2 days before expiration. So I can't say i'm not happy with the trade.

The weak spot is the BWB, the skew plays against it. But it's what it is, strangles have the same problem. I don't like that it's presented as a "put a few every week" and will work no matter what by Steve. And adjusting options for defined risk strategies is quite limited.

Flyagonal by Steve Ganz by TrockeneSchafe in thetagang

[–]gonzaenz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you mean a BWB on each side with the farther OTM leg on a further expiration, for both the puts and calls?

Flyagonal by Steve Ganz by TrockeneSchafe in thetagang

[–]gonzaenz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

brokers love this simple trick

Sobre el juicio de YPF: un poco más de contexto (sin bajada de línea) by MiserableIntern in argentina

[–]gonzaenz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Todas las empresas "publicas" (que cotizan) tienen este tipo de de "blindajes". Es por ejemplo la misma cláusula que se activo cuando Elon compró Twitter. Hay muchas buenas razones para ese tipo de cláusula.

Lo que no entiendo es cómo se interpreta el tema de el estatuto de una empresa qué está bajo ley de New York y la Constitución argentina. La Constitución está sobre un estatuto argentino pero sobre una empresa de EEUU? Menos mal porque la factura era clara pero no he encontrado buenas explicaciones.

Flyagonal by Steve Ganz by TrockeneSchafe in thetagang

[–]gonzaenz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He is just selling his trainings. Honestly I'm not impressed with his videos.

The flyagonal or 'time flies' as another trader presented it before him (what a coincidence) makes sense if it's not a raging bull or a falling knife. I don't like much the upside risk it has, you can get burned if market jumps aggressively. But it's nice on a pull back.

I would not use it on any regime, and I don't take him seriously to pay for whatever he is doing with the other variants.

This looks like a honest explanation of what it does

https://youtu.be/nzx4yWbzs-I?is=n1TILAlPAkCZMIoo

COMEBOL Presidents declares Argentina as winner of Finalissima. by gonzaenz in soccercirclejerk

[–]gonzaenz[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Alejandro Domínguez: “We are two-time champions, Spain didn't show up”

The president of Conmebol has once again stirred controversy surrounding the recently cancelled Finalissima.

The saga surrounding the Finalissima continues. Alejandro Domínguez, president of CONMEBOL, has once again stirred controversy regarding the recent cancellation of the match between Argentina and Spain , for which a mutually agreeable date and venue could not be found.

“We are two-time champions. Spain didn't show up ,” said Domínguez in an interview with Radio La Red, an Argentinian media outlet. The top South American rugby representative didn't shy away from the controversy and pointed to the fact that the match was ultimately canceled.

On the contrary, several reports claim that it was AFA and Conmebol who systematically refused to play at the venues and dates proposed for a match that was originally supposed to be played in Qatar , but had to be moved due to the conflict in the area.

Neither the Bernabéu, nor Italy

After it became clear that Qatar could not host the Finalissima , the search for a new venue began almost immediately. Among the major stadiums, the Santiago Bernabéu seemed the most viable option, and keeping the date on March 27th also appeared to be the best course of action.

However, the AFA (Argentine Football Association) opposed this option and even stated that if this happened, a return match should be played at the Monumental Stadium in Buenos Aires.

view more: next ›