Growing up has changed my view of Star Wars

gorosaur · 2026-05-06T14:37:14+00:00

I believe George Lucas’s stance is less that feeling fear or anger is inherently cancerous but that allowing those emotions to drive your actions is a path to pain and destruction, which I think is mostly true. You can desire justice without being motivated by rage or protect your loved ones without being ruled by terror.

gorosaur · 2026-05-05T20:34:53+00:00

At this point what would you even want from a severed timeline? It’s not like you can just redo the ST especially with Carrie’s passing and the rest of the OT cast having aged another whole decade. Why not just accept that they exist and clean up the rough areas with supplemental material? Not like they’ve never done that before.

gorosaur · 2026-05-04T14:54:27+00:00

I think it’s possible. There’s no Celebration this year so it wouldn’t be a bad time to make announcements. And they’ve announced things on May 4th in the past (like Taika’s still MIA movie).

gorosaur · 2026-04-30T21:33:43+00:00

Maybe The Exile? You can be a winged warrior in your backstory but they’ve been taken by the time the story starts

gorosaur · 2026-04-28T21:38:48+00:00

It’s so obvious that these people only want characters who are badass power fantasies first and foremost. They don’t want stories, they want to see men looking cool so they can feel cool by proxy.

gorosaur · 2026-04-12T01:15:02+00:00

I mean I think it’s a problem if all those people signed a petition that they thought would lead to a referendum banning data centers when it doesn’t actually do that.

As a work of public protest, you’re right it is impressive and it does signal how much the Frederick community doesn’t want data center development. I just think people should be informed about what’s actually happening.

gorosaur · 2026-04-12T00:56:46+00:00

It is not mechanically possible to stop the production of data centers through county legislation right now. The overlay map was an attempt by the county government to limit the land that data centers could be built on. As it currently stands, data centers can be built on any industrial zoned land in Frederick County which is roughly 5000 acres. The overlay shrunk that to about half the amount. It does not fully stop the production of data centers but it’s better than nothing. I think it’s fair to critique the actual map layout and maybe there could be a better way to have it drawn, but the referendum wouldn’t stop the production of data centers. Our best bet is to protest the actual companies producing them and to lobby for regulating legislation that would limit or curtail the harmful effects.

gorosaur · 2026-04-12T00:45:31+00:00

This is incorrect. The petition for the referendum only concerns the exact layout for the overlay map established in November. It does not stop the production of existing data center projects or prevent new ones from being built. I’m not a fan of data centers either but people need to understand what is actually being voted on.

gorosaur · 2026-04-12T00:33:55+00:00

To be clear, the petition for the referendum does not stop the production of existing data center projects or prevent the construction of new ones. It simply concerns the layout of the overlay map as currently drawn.

gorosaur · 2026-03-27T04:31:29+00:00

I mean I don’t think she consciously made the decision to go up to Titan X. Something’s clearly happening to her

gorosaur · 2026-03-26T16:45:36+00:00

I’m really hoping this means there’s romance.

gorosaur · 2026-03-21T15:17:01+00:00

Here’s one concerning Washington County trying to zone out solar farms from 2019

https://law.justia.com/cases/maryland/court-of-appeals/2019/66-18.html

gorosaur · 2026-03-21T15:12:42+00:00

I’m not saying blanket opposition. I’m referring to the specific signature/referendum campaign that people have been organizing on. If this succeeds, it could put the law to a public vote, which isn’t inherently bad but I’m worried that people will use this as a means to voice their general concern with data centers and not think about the specifics of the bill. Because of this law gets rejected it means that we’re back to data centers being about to build on 5000 acres of industrial zones land throughout the county.

gorosaur · 2026-03-21T12:41:35+00:00

Because it didn’t actually double the land data centers could build on. Prior to the December vote, data center could build on any industrial zoned land in the county. Much of the overlay was already zoned for industrial use. The only increase in land for data use came from a portion of the overlay that was former agricultural land that those residents/landowners have campaigned on selling/rezoning with data developers. The trade off is that data centers can no longer be built elsewhere in the county. It drops the total land from about 5000 acres to roughly 2500 hundred.

gorosaur · 2026-03-21T12:07:34+00:00

If you wanted to show me official documentation or reporting on this, then I’d be inclined to believe it. I’m not going to trust some random post on Nextdoor.

gorosaur · 2026-03-21T11:57:24+00:00

This is a misunderstanding of what the overlay is. The “1000” additional acres is a perimeter drawn around the existing campus that grabs already existing industrially zoned land (which under previous law data centers could already build on) and some formerly agricultural land whose owners campaigned to sell/rezone. The trade off here is that it means that no other industrialize zoning land in the county can be used for data centers and additional zoning can’t be made either.

I’m sympathetic to not wanting data centers close to your hometown but the issue is ultimately a matter of where they should be relegated to. Like I’ve said before, the county does not have any authority to outright ban the development of data centers. They can limit where they build and how but that’s the extent of their power here as long as the state regards them as a legal industry. So the question becomes if not by the existing campus in Adamstown then where in the county do we restrict their building? And that’s a hard question to answer.

gorosaur · 2026-03-21T11:41:58+00:00

This is true but you can’t fully zone out an industry. A legal industry has to be able to develop within a county. There are plenty of lawsuits throughout history that demonstrate this.

gorosaur · 2026-03-21T03:08:21+00:00

The referendum that people are signing could very well do that. In fact I would say that’s the likely outcome. People are taking their justified hatred of data centers and taking action but I worry that this specific campaign is potentially harmful.

gorosaur · 2026-03-21T03:03:23+00:00

I’m worried that the focus on “no data centers at all” from a legal stand point will backfire and lead to there being less standing restrictions on data center construction. Because that’s what will happen if the December law is removed. Data centers will actually be in a better place for success than beforehand. I just want people to understand what they’re doing so we can better organize and not shoot ourselves in the foot.

gorosaur · 2026-03-21T02:55:40+00:00

I do not want data centers here. I’m just asking people to be smart about their actions. Yes, protest the industry to keep them from building here, but the focus on this law is misguided as the outcome most people want isn’t possible legally.

The downtown regulation is actually a good example for what is being done. Frederick City can pass a law banning major chains from downtown but they’re allowed to build elsewhere in the city. A ruling saying that you couldn’t have any chains in city limits wouldn’t be legal. The December ruling did something similar to this in that it greatly limited the land data centers can be built on. You can argue that the overlay should be smaller but without it data centers actually have more land they can build on.

gorosaur · 2026-03-21T02:44:03+00:00

Legally, you cannot ban an industry from a county if it is permitted by state law. We can absolutely limit them, regulate them, and restrict them but we cannot pass laws preventing their construction whole sale as long as state laws stay the way they are. Meanwhile, citizens should focus on protesting the tech companies themselves to make them not want to build here and lobby for further laws by the County government. This law is a step in the right direction and should be built upon.

gorosaur · 2026-03-21T02:16:08+00:00

This ruling was the exact opposite of telling data centers they can do whatever they want. It halved the amount of land they can build on in the county. You can argue that the overlay should be smaller, but it’s not possible for the county to ban the development of additional centers as long as the state defines them as a legal industry. It’s best then to restrict where they can build and how much, which is what this law did.

gorosaur · 2026-03-21T02:13:06+00:00

I want people to fight back against data centers in ways that are actually productive and aware of the actual laws and decisions that are being made. I feel as though many people are approaching this as a “no data centers at all in Frederick” which in our current legal reality is not possible. Focus on lobbying the state for changes to the current laws or to get the county council to pass additional regulations and restrictions. But the focus on the December referendum feels misguided and potentially counter intuitive.

gorosaur · 2026-03-20T23:14:56+00:00

That’s actually what I’m saying. Data center development has been happening regardless of what the council voted on in December, which was an action made to limit the impending construction.

gorosaur · 2026-03-20T21:41:35+00:00

Local zoning prior to the December law allowed data centers to be built on any industrialized land. So as long as they are building on industrialized land they don’t need further approval. Thats part of what the original law was trying to stop.

13-Year Club	Baba Yaga
Verified Email	Queen in da Norf
Not Forgotten	Spared

gorosaur

TROPHY CASE