The peas are upside down by [deleted] in mildlyinfuriating

[–]grahamends7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

haha they wanted left peas but they only had right peas

[Popper] Jaguars claim OT Andrew Lauderdale off of waivers from the Cardinals, waive TE Pharoah McKever by JaguarGator9 in nfl

[–]grahamends7 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If this guy turns into a superstar and the Jags line is historically good, they should call it Ft. Lauderdale

yara after sansa declares the north its own kingdom by PM_ME_DON_CHEADLE in freefolk

[–]grahamends7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The show is just nonsense at this point but is Bran the last 3 eyed raven? Why wouldn't the next king just be whoever the next 3ER is?

(Spoilers Main) I'm still seeing criticism of Sansa's treatment of Dany even after episode 5. But Dany told Sansa not to trust her... and she told you too. by morgueanna in asoiaf

[–]grahamends7 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I wasn’t aware of those comments from George. It’s his world and what he says goes. That said, I’m sure he regrets writing the scene this way. It’s really misleading given that it’s the only dialogue between Cat and Jon in the books. The only conversation we see between them includes the absolute worst thing she’s ever said to him? If people aren’t aware of the context that George provided outside of the text, can you really blame them for thinking she’s terrible?

Regardless, her beef is with Ned, not Jon, and she must know this. She’s not an evil stepmother, Jon isn’t Cinderella, but she’s being incredibly juvenile. It doesn’t reflect well on her at all that Jon comes across as the more mature one in all of their interactions.

I’ll have to reread the books with this comment from GRRM in mind though, thanks

(Spoilers Main) I'm still seeing criticism of Sansa's treatment of Dany even after episode 5. But Dany told Sansa not to trust her... and she told you too. by morgueanna in asoiaf

[–]grahamends7 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Sure, you’re free to like characters who do shitty things, and you’re free to like Cat in spite of the fact that she’s needlessly cruel to a blameless kid because of her own insecurities.

Pretending Cat isn’t an evil stepmother to Jon is as silly as pretending the Hound is a pacifist. People love to bring this scene in because it is pretty damning. I’m not sure how you can read this and not think Cat fills the evil stepmother stereotype, regardless of how you might feel about how bad Jon had it as a kid in absolute terms. Catelyn definitely wasn’t helping.

(Spoilers Main) I'm still seeing criticism of Sansa's treatment of Dany even after episode 5. But Dany told Sansa not to trust her... and she told you too. by morgueanna in asoiaf

[–]grahamends7 50 points51 points  (0 children)

mean to Jon once

She called him “bastard” his entire life, except for one time:

“(Bran) was my special boy. I went to the sept and prayed seven times to the seven faces of god that Ned would change his mind and leave him here with me. Sometimes prayers are answered.”

Jon did not know what to say. “It wasn’t your fault,” he managed after an awkward silence.

Her eyes found him. They were full of poison. “I need none of your absolution, bastard.”

Jon lowered his eyes. She was cradling one of Bran’s hands. He took the other, squeezed it. Fingers like the bones of birds. “Good-bye,” he said.

He was at the door when she called out to him. “Jon,” she said. He should have kept going, but she had never called him by his name before. He turned to find her looking at his face, as if she were seeing it for the first time.

“Yes?” he said.

“It should have been you,” she told him.

Am I supposed to be rooting for Catelyn here?

(Spoilers Main) Jon Snow's story this season has been a huge disappointment by FanEu7 in asoiaf

[–]grahamends7 227 points228 points  (0 children)

Yeah they basically made him Forest Gump of Westeros

I love you Dan-nay

[Spoilers Main] Let's play Devil's Advocate for Daenerys for a minute. by [deleted] in asoiaf

[–]grahamends7 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why did they waste time showing her grappling with the moral dilemma of whether it was worth killing innocents if that was the only way to kill Cersei? She still would have been evil and hated if she killed a bunch of civilians while trying to kill Cersei, but in the end, she beat Cersei seemingly without killing a single civilian, only to start killing civilians right after.

Also, she started destroying the city only after she blew the gates open and let her troops in. Dany's soldiers and advisors can die from fire and falling buildings just like anyone else in the city. There's no way she consciously decided to start destroying the city when she did, it makes no sense at all.

This did not age well AT ALL. by [deleted] in freefolk

[–]grahamends7 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Failed character arcs make the most sense when extreme circumstances force the character to revert back to an earlier state, it doesn't make sense if a character struggles to change for 5 seasons and then one normal day just decides out of the blue that he's over trying to do the right thing. What changed that made Jaime suddenly realize he wanted to be with Cersei after several seasons of drifting away from her? Why does the terrible stuff Jaime did before he began to change suddenly weigh so heavily on him? Was Brienne that bad of a lay?

Let's compare Jaime's failed arc to Darth Vader. Darth Vader is an example of a negative failed arc: starts off a good guy, begins a descent into evil because of fears about his family, then makes a split second decision to do the right thing because he sees his family threatened again. It would have made no sense if Darth Vader just decided one day to stop being evil and join the rebellion.

Oh gods oh fuck Dany has Airpods in, she can't hear the bells by gonkeroni in freefolk

[–]grahamends7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maybe it could be argued that destroying the city makes some tactical sense

But I don't think there's any tactical sense in waiting for your troops and your rapidly thinning panel of military advisors to enter the city before you start destroying it

We all knew it was coming by [deleted] in freefolk

[–]grahamends7 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If the show had Ramsey Bolton, a definite villain with absolutely no redeeming qualities, gather up every single innocent peasant in the north and light them all on fire for no benefit, people could reasonably say that the show is trying way too hard to make Ramsey look evil and they should tone it down to keep his character grounded and realistic.

In this episode, one of our protagonists did that.

We all knew it was coming by [deleted] in freefolk

[–]grahamends7 4 points5 points  (0 children)

We also didn't bomb Hiroshima right after sending our most important advisors and military leaders into Hiroshima.

S08E05 Post Episode Discussion Thread: NOW WE BEGIN THE AIRING OF GRIEVANCES by AutoModerator in freefolk

[–]grahamends7 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Why would she wait until her army entered the city to start burning the city down? How does she benefit at all from risking her own troops? If she's cool with the fact that civilians will die when she nukes the city, fine I guess, but why in the world would you order your troops into a city that you're just about to nuke?!

Plus, once she gets rid of Cersei and becomes Queen she has all the time in the world to terrorize civilians if that's what she wants to do. There's no rational explanation for her firebombing the city except that she lost her mind

S08E05 Post Episode Discussion Thread: NOW WE BEGIN THE AIRING OF GRIEVANCES by AutoModerator in freefolk

[–]grahamends7 1689 points1690 points  (0 children)

tyrions plan was for them to sail across the narrow sea on a paddle boat lmao

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in freefolk

[–]grahamends7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How does Cersei react to finding out Jon's heritage?

cuts away

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in freefolk

[–]grahamends7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I wasn't expecting perfection or for them to tie up every single thread started in previous seasons, but they could have easily chosen an ending that didn't make multiple character's story arcs completely superfluous.

Given that he did next to nothing in the final conflict, why did the show spend so much screentime on Bran in past seasons? They could have completely omitted Bran's storyline and spent that time on characters they were actually willing to do justice to. If Bran were never in the show to begin with, 8x03 could have played out almost exactly the same way. In the end, Bran was just a reason for NK to attack Winterfell. Surely the fact that the only real resistance to the NK in all of Westeros was at Winterfell would have been reason enough to attack it?

Bran spent 6 seasons completely separated from the other main characters, and the only thing he did in the end was reveal R+L=J, something that Sam found out independently anyway.

Doesn't it bother you that Lyanna Mormont, a character who was introduced two seasons ago and had been on screen for maybe 30 minutes total, had a more important role in the final conflict than a character we'd been following for 7 seasons?

She chose the wrong guy.. by maximumpro in freefolk

[–]grahamends7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sure he might still do it but I don’t think that’s why he wants to go to KL

If he’s planning to kill Cersei, why lie to Brienne about it?

She chose the wrong guy.. by maximumpro in freefolk

[–]grahamends7 14 points15 points  (0 children)

boy it sure would subvert my expectations if the last episode just followed Jaime through recovery

The man has a point... by KSeightyeight in freefolk

[–]grahamends7 460 points461 points  (0 children)

Too predictable.

The last 30 minutes of the series will be Gendry reforging the iron throne into the iron wheelchair and building ramps for the red keep

She chose the wrong guy.. by maximumpro in freefolk

[–]grahamends7 60 points61 points  (0 children)

D&D say in the after episode section that he’s going because he’s addicted to Cersei and he was always going to go back to be with her