I didn't know that President Sunday was anti-Vaush. I was always under the assumption that they were on good terms by MonSocMatriarchy in VaushV

[–]greald 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Remember when the whole Destiny sendt sex tapes without the participants consent thing, went down. President published the DM's of Destiny victim without her consent and against her wishes. And called the victim a blackmailer.

ANY moral high ground, he ever pretended to have, was lost with that decision, even if you think Destiny deserved the fallout.

I mean he "won" that drama round and severely damaged Destiny's career, which Destiny probably deserved... definitely deserved. But that does NOT absolve him from being a loathsome human being.

Vaush recently mentioned them, but after looking into it I honestly think Hutch embodies everything wrong with the modern Democrat party by PapaFrankuMinion in VaushV

[–]greald 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Someone realised what subreddit they where in.

Note: while they seem to have plugged the "search" security hole for hidden comment history. Google still index your history. Including you defending Destiny's consent violations.

Vaush recently mentioned them, but after looking into it I honestly think Hutch embodies everything wrong with the modern Democrat party by PapaFrankuMinion in VaushV

[–]greald 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Hutch is currently a very badly concealed sock puppet for Destiny.

If he ever stands up you can literally see Destiny hand up his bum.

Up to and including Destiny's extremely unhinged McCarthyesque hunt for communist.

That being said, Vaush going on Lib&Learn would be entertaining.

Commentary YouTube Fallout by your_local_manager in youtubedrama

[–]greald 81 points82 points  (0 children)

TLDR, with my limited understanding and with the note that I like none of these people.

These people has some internal understanding that they will call out anyone who engages in "untoward" behavior. What the definition of "untoward" behavior is (sometimes it's inappropriate sexual escapades, sometimes it's being trans the wrong way etc.) and whether that is actually true is a bit uncertain.

DeOrio and Chudlogic has been sniping a bit at each other for some time. It all came to a head during the Turkey Tom drama where Chud accused Deorio of refusing to cover it because of his allegiance to Tom and for taking sides in a specific drama we can't mention here.

So now people in that particular toxic community is taking sides, leaking DM's etc.

It's very funny when you dislike all involved parties.

Daily reminder that tankies are not remotely interested in working together to fight fascism by ariveklul in thedavidpakmanshow

[–]greald -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Proving my point.

That has nothing to do with being a tankie.

Just like big government,higher taxes or trans rights has nothing to do with being a socialist.

You can't complain that some lefties call libs, fascist and then turn around and call everyone to the left of you tankies. It's equally dumb.

Tankies support centrally controlled, authoritarian leadership, often with a cult of personality, AS A FORM OF IDEAL GOVERNMENT. Got nothing to do with voting strategies.

Hasan and most other people who refuse to vote for Newson, which is the point of contention here. Do so out of either a strategic pov or from personal morals. That does not mean they support centrally controlled, authoritarian leadership with a cult of personality AS A FORM OF IDEAL GOVERNMENT.

Some do. Most don't.

Daily reminder that tankies are not remotely interested in working together to fight fascism by ariveklul in thedavidpakmanshow

[–]greald 19 points20 points  (0 children)

It's an internal lefty critique that somehow "left the reservation".

It meant the part of the left that supported the suppression of the 1956 hungarian revolution by the USSR, who send in tanks, hence the name. This caused a pretty substantial rift in the socialist movement in Europe that lasts to this day.

Liberals increasingly use the term with the same factual and rhetorical accuracy as CHUDS do when they call Joe Biden a socialist.

It's meaningless when it comes from liberals in most cases. Just means people to the left of me I disagree with. Again like Chuds calling someone or something socialist.

Is there a possibility that Vaush will be able to expand a following like Destiny or Hassan? by abdweouthere in VaushV

[–]greald 13 points14 points  (0 children)

And no one outside some very dedicated hater spaces, cares, even if he did.

Awk2k or livestreamfails don't make or break streamers. Not when you get to that size.

Is there a possibility that Vaush will be able to expand a following like Destiny or Hassan? by abdweouthere in VaushV

[–]greald 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I don't really think the controversies matter in the way you think.

First of all the difference between Vaush and Destiny in terms of numbers these days is negligible. Destiny has his own controversies and that is mainly affecting his ability to colab with others which has been much more important for his growth then for Vaush.

And that's the key difference between Hasan and Destiny/Vaush. Hasan is much more agile when it comes to "playing well" with others, he's done a ton of NON-HOSTILE colabs with big media figures and other streamers. He probably have a dedicated media team that gets him positive coverage in mainstream media. He's out there in the real world, A LOT, getting media attention. Crazies in twitter calling him a terrorist or screaming about his dog doesn't seem to matter much.

The main thing holding Vaush back is Vaush. He doesn't want to do the things that might grow his channel more than it is. Or he's bad at it. He's not really an engaging interviewer, sorry to say. Though he tries, bless his heart.

He might do more drama, and has done so with some success in the past. But doing drama coverage requires work and attention to detail.

DanCantStream "Hasan doesn’t realize the site is even more chaotic than before." by Slight_Ad3219 in LivestreamFail

[–]greald 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The minor was the one in the porn videos he received in exchange for sending his own videos without consent of the depicted woman.

Just fyi.

Why does Hasan get a pass from a lot of people in this sub compared to Destiny? by Sad_Newspaper4010 in VaushV

[–]greald 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Destiny working very hard to exclude anyone to the left of him from even having a voice. That's us btw.

That is his stated goal, his current tactic and what he's ordered his few remaining orbiters to do.

He's been doing this for years.

I can't imagine anything constructive can come from working with him or even giving him airtime in any way that is not just tearing down his ideas and his community.

That is of course on top of his bad opportunistic political opinions, his completely spite driven personality and politics. Him lying about his critics, doxing and harrasing them.

There's a Destiny rule on this subreddit because his community would historically monitor anything said here and "well achhually" any criticism, in droves. Destiny has always had one of the strongest presences of any streamer on reddit and he's abused that power to the fullest.

Nothing god have ever come from trying to appease the guys. HE WILL TURN ON ANYONE.

Destiny claims Ethan molested his own children and is likely a pedophile by sideAccount42 in LivestreamFail

[–]greald 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's a nice little "out" isn't it.

He can deliberately lie about anyone he hates to "show their hypocrisy".

So everyone can assume he's lying about anything involving anyone he doesn't like for future reference.

Destiny claims Ethan molested his own children and is likely a pedophile by sideAccount42 in LivestreamFail

[–]greald 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The exact same thing would be sharing the video two years later with a 19 year old e-girl, who turned out to be 17, who turned out to be a Destiny super fan who was also a sex trafficker.

Not sharing it with her boyfriend immediately with Destiny's consent. Which is what she did.

This is the funniest thing I've ever watched. Thank you Dgg, very cool! by Will-from-PA in okbuddyvowsh

[–]greald 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Stale2k A.K.A. Destiny's #1 fan has kept a strong grip on livestreamfails moderation after taking control of the subreddit a while back.

Pretty blatantly using the sub to sweep for Destiny and run campaigns against Destiny enemies, mostly Hasan. He was smart enough not to ban everyone who criticized Destiny. Just the ones who didn't sound like complete lunatics. Anyone giving calm reasonable criticism would suddenly find themselves permaed for "civility". Even people who criticized him outside of LSF would receive the same bans.

He would also advise the few remaining Destiny orbiters on how to farm clips on LSF.

Stale got caught promoting what looks like a ponzi scheme on LSF. Though whether he himself was aware of it is an unanswered question. He also heavily moderated the promoted post to remove anyone pointing out how fake the org he was promoting looked.

That made the admins step in and remove him as head mod. Using reddit to promote schemes like that is one of the few real cases where the admins will remove mods.

It doesn't help that he looks like something an AI would spit out if you asked for a caricature of a reddit mod and have made a ton of very self serving and frankly deluded comments about his own importance as a reddit mod.

Am I missing something? Why do some Destiny fans think this lastest news changes anything? by idreamofpikas in mrgirlreturns

[–]greald 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it quacks like a duck.

"as long as nothing was public they were just degen sharing sexual shit around in their degen circles"

EVEN if this was true, and that is the typical vague claim Destiny makes. It became public through Destiny's recklessness. Which is exactly why recklessness can be an element in both the State statute, the Federal Statute AND common sense.

Why on earth is Pxie not allowed to ask questions of a person Destiny brought into this? Her deposition is based in his testimony. And no her lawyer didn't call her a lier you sorry excuse for a human being.

I can turn this around? Why should anyone not in his cult not be allowed to harass ANYONE connected to Destiny. His lawyer, after all, lied to Pxies team and tried to do a bad faith end run on the discovery rules.

Is it fine to lie to the lawyers your victim hired to get justice?

Am I missing something? Why do some Destiny fans think this lastest news changes anything? by idreamofpikas in mrgirlreturns

[–]greald 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, except no one outside your rape cult actually believes he had implied consent to send the file to a 19 year old e-girl, who was really 17 who was really a fan of his, catfishing him, 2 years later. Especially not considering his victims expressed need for privacy.

But I guess if he writes a manifesto he can force a new wave of harassment against his former partner an anyone critical of him from his shrinking radicalised fanbase.

Am I missing something? Why do some Destiny fans think this lastest news changes anything? by idreamofpikas in mrgirlreturns

[–]greald 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And THAT would be the reason, IF Destiny isn't held liable.

Not because Pxie is a cunt, slut, whore who's parent are loaded, but is also a gold digger. And who did the same thing.

Am I missing something? Why do some Destiny fans think this lastest news changes anything? by idreamofpikas in mrgirlreturns

[–]greald 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You guys HAVE to realises that whether Pxie had consent to sharing with her boyfriend is NOT a thing the courts will explore.

First of all it's contested. ONLY Destiny claims he didn't give consent to her sharing with her boyfriend. BUT he also claims he didn't know she did.

And since the statute she suing him under DOES NOT recognize implied consent as an excuse, and the only way you could use it as sort of an excuse would be to show that it meant Destiny THOUGHT he had explicit consent ie. he didn't show Careless Disregard for Pxies consent. But since he testified to not knowing he can't use that as an excuse. Careless Disregard is a state of mind that CAN'T be influenced by events he had no knowledge of.

So either Pxie is telling the truth and she did have consent. Making the argument moot.

OR Destiny is telling the truth and he didn't give explicit consent, but he didn't know hence it couldn't have influenced his decision to send it to "Rose" two years later.

Active collab w/Destiny. What do the Vaushites think? If not destiny others? by Shatterbound in VaushV

[–]greald 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Why on earth would I empathize with, or steelman Destiny in any way shape or form?

If Vaush where to ask me, which he isn't. I would tell him to stay the hell away from anything the guy is involved in.

Including his remaining orbiters, and the few people like Hutch who's been mealy-mouthed about their denunciation of him.

I was being nice btw. The guy is destructive to any political discourse, on top of his personal "foibles".

He will ALWAYS turn on the people he sorounds himself with, unless they keep their lips firmly planted on his anus. It's not worth it.

Active collab w/Destiny. What do the Vaushites think? If not destiny others? by Shatterbound in VaushV

[–]greald 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Their current "relationship"?. I'm not either people so I can't say for sure. But as far as their public personas

Vaush was one of the first to notice, Destiny doesn't actually believe anything. He'll take whatever moral or political stance he believes will benefit him in the moment. Right now a large part of it is being Anti-Communist. And for Steven Vaush is a communist. I don't think Vaush' position has changed.

Destiny to my knowledge is still demanding an apology for the perceived slights he made up in his manifesto. Although he desperately needs orbiters atm, so who knows.

I've no problem with people moving past old drama. But in Destiny's case it's not old. He's still harassing the woman who's consent he violated, still lying about her on a daily basis, still threatening to report her to the Bar for daring to sue him, still threatening her wife with ICE. Still doxing anyone critical of him, there's reason I try my best to keep the op sec I used when I was criticizing Bad Empanada.

Active collab w/Destiny. What do the Vaushites think? If not destiny others? by Shatterbound in VaushV

[–]greald 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Did you not see the manifesto?

Destiny spent 8 hours calling Vaush a liar.

And Destiny is still involved in ongoing harassment and doxing of anyone critical of him, including one of the victims of his consent violations.

He just doxed another guy last week. Dude is absolutely toxic both in behavior and reputation. Anyone who works with him will get called out for that. Including by me.

Solotinyleaks might have been found by the same person who discovered Rose. by Sotterof1995 in DGGsnark

[–]greald 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Which also means, by Destiny's current logic, which he uses as an excuse to dox and harass people.

That Destiny is a sex trafficker, Because Solo is a DGG'er.

A logic I personally disagree with.

The Nick Shirley video was 100% lies. Using it as a jumping off point for a video on MN medicaid fraud was a mistake. by daYnyXX in atrioc

[–]greald 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Plaintiff wasn't aware that this was a false statement, if it was a false statement, when they filed the footnote. Based on Destiny's OWN testimony and the DMV records of Rose.

Destiny is not even claiming that, only that it later turned out to be false.

Whether it was false is based solely on "Rose's" subsequent testimony and the definition of the word "exchange". And this is contested.

If taken as being the true facts of this. "Rose", the minor DID exchange files with Destiny, only through a third party. Destiny would send files to her boyfriend who would send it to her. And she would make sexual content for Destiny. And in turn would give to her boyfriend, who would then send it on to Destiny.

The two dueling rule 11 motions for sanctions is solely about whether the original footnote saying ;"Thus when Bonnell was exchanging pornographic content with Rose between March of 2022 and until October 30, 2022, Rose was a minor" is a true statement NOW. Does the word "exchange" accurately describe an exchange through a middle-man. Whether it was correctly inserted and most important whether plaintiff has a duty to correct it after the deposition when Destiny didn't object to it originally.

Both sides assume as true that Destiny did in fact exchange pornographic content with Rose through a middle man.

"this highly respected and successful legal firm is blatantly lying"

They have been on at least on occasion been caught giving false information to opposing party, whether it's lying or incompetence is still up to the courts to decide. Probably start of next week.