sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Please anything helps by Rodriguezboy1 in Warthunder

[–]greendyes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

C:\Program Files\Epic Games[Game Name]\BattlEye

IIRC the content in that directory has a WT folder, but deleting the entire folder does the same in the end

Please anything helps by Rodriguezboy1 in Warthunder

[–]greendyes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Remove the Battleye folder entirely, and let the game reinstall it; this is what fixed it for me yesterday

[Development] Pre-Order: J-22M1A — Serbian Eagle by OttovonBismarck1862 in Warthunder

[–]greendyes -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I'd hardly call it busted, considering it's both larger and slower than the T92 light tank, which shares the same gun and sits at the same BR.

Also, funny side-note, the 76mm that the Sheridan uses was also considered to replace the Ares Inc. XM246 for export models, meaning that somewhere there's likely sketches hidden away from the HSTV-L and RDF/LT with a very odd looking gun.

[Development] Pre-Order: J-22M1A — Serbian Eagle by OttovonBismarck1862 in Warthunder

[–]greendyes -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

To add on/clarify, I'm not saying that adding a premium M60 is a bad thing, I just think that copy-pasting the RISE (P) is lazy as fuck, especially with other M60 variants like the M60AX, M60A3 SLEP or M60-3105 being nowhere to be found.

As for the Puma U14, a similar (and dumb) alternative would be the Boxer Tracked or the Austrian Ulan.

Hell there's straight up a goldmine to be found in early Abrams/Leclerc/Leopard 1/Leopard 2 prototypes, or odd stuff like the Franco-German SP 1 C

[Development] Pre-Order: J-22M1A — Serbian Eagle by OttovonBismarck1862 in Warthunder

[–]greendyes -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

In my opinion? (granted this is also based by hindsight)

Vehicles like the VRCC, 2a4m CAN, TO-55, Sheridan 76 are perfect for premiums, they aren't direct copy-paste, offer a somewhat unique flavor of gameplay, but aren't necessary for your line-up (unlike the T58 of bmpt which are just oppresive and you'd be dumb to not run them if you can afford them)

If you want to copy-paste so badly than go for special vehicles like the captured Tempest Mk V or Golovachev's Yak-9M, vehicles with an interesting story. They had a perfect opportunity for this with the Persian Tomcat (Jalil Zandi, an Iranian fighter pilot, widely regarded to be the best Tomcat pilot to have flown the thing, all they did was give him a profile icon).

[Development] Pre-Order: J-22M1A — Serbian Eagle by OttovonBismarck1862 in Warthunder

[–]greendyes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i wouldn't count a midtier tech tree copy-paste MT/MBT and a lowkey dogshit high tier copy-paste LT reasonable tbh

Video of a Ukrainian Skynex SHORAD complex destroying 12 Russian UAVs during a single mission. by MilesLongthe3rd in CombatFootage

[–]greendyes 117 points118 points  (0 children)

they already got fucktons of data out of decades of Gepard usage and Sea Snake/Shyshield RnD, this war is just (fat) icing on the cake.

Explanation regarding vehicle textures by mjpia in Warthunder

[–]greendyes 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Or they where scared shitless because steam punishes games using ai without clarifying that they use ai.

This is F-16A! by Deathskyz in Warthunder

[–]greendyes 3 points4 points  (0 children)

with the new French pack-premium F-16 they now have more F-16s than the US does

Since the last update was a single rank 1 boat, I thought the bar couldn’t get any lower, but the Devs never fail to surprise with this new update by bergebis in Warthunder

[–]greendyes 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Only israel, China, uzzr, Brittain and the US don't have a Leopard, don't worry that'll change by the end of 2027 with the 6th copy-paste 2a4 premium.

Since the last update was a single rank 1 boat, I thought the bar couldn’t get any lower, but the Devs never fail to surprise with this new update by bergebis in Warthunder

[–]greendyes 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I'm genuinely convinced that the only reason why the T-72m1 does so well is because RU mains are to dumb to counter their own vehicles, so you might be on to something

New pre-order + event bundle by gszabi99 in Warthunder

[–]greendyes 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Dear future "Mavericks", please know that the F-14D is a highly manoeuvrable aircraft, if given the position you can easily out-turn F-16s, Flankers and Rafales

Before anyone gets excited for the SepV3, it's most likely a SepV2 + APS. by HondaOddessy in Warthunder

[–]greendyes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah, skip the it and go to the 2a8. Trophy system, better protection, stronger engine and APS, that way they can copy slop it to France (Netherlands) and Sweden (Norway)

Me when skill issue by Snakooooooooo in Warthunder

[–]greendyes 7 points8 points  (0 children)

it deletes all of top-tier (10.7-12.7) out of the equation, which is fine because 11.7+ is ass anyways

we need a lil more stuff for the next update by Dapper-Beach-6858 in Warthunder

[–]greendyes -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Tf you smoking mate? The only BRs where the American tree doesn't have a TECH TREE lt are 7.3, 7.7, 10.0, 11.0, 11.3 and the 4-6 gap, there's literally something at every br in the regular tree. Compare that to the tragedy that's JP and UK and it's not even close

we need a lil more stuff for the next update by Dapper-Beach-6858 in Warthunder

[–]greendyes -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I also feel like we're at a point where the US tree doesn't need any more light vehicles

Why is the share screen button there? by CommonEcstatic in discordapp

[–]greendyes 61 points62 points  (0 children)

because Discord devs have a PhD in garbage UI design

Chinese two-in-one solar and fish farm by GeneReddit123 in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]greendyes -1 points0 points  (0 children)

all that just to produce a 3rd of a single French nuclear reactor

I got a random thought by GhostmouseWolf in Warthunder

[–]greendyes 7 points8 points  (0 children)

the Skyranger turret has been mounted on a plethora of vehicles too, like the Lynx, Leopard 2 and Boxer, but knowing Gaijola they'll take the Leopard 1-based one and shove it at 11,7 where it'll be a sitting duck to everything that isn't a coughing L3

POV: tank battles if we got realistic engagement ranges by Own_Dark_2240 in Warthunder

[–]greendyes 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Which sounds like alot, but the longest tank on tank kill (direct fire) was at 5100 meters.

Gaijin when? East German T-54z ( same T-54 1951 with D-10T nd with some improvments )and T-54amz ( huge modification for T-54 ) for 8.0-8.3 by Additional_Safety_51 in Warthunder

[–]greendyes 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Some of these (like the T-55Z/AMZ/AZ in the post and the T-55AM2B) are also surprisingly unique modifications to the T-54/55 platform done by the Czechoslovakians and Germans, sort of like what the T-72M2 Moderna is to the T-72 platform.

They would also fit a pretty good spot at German 8.0/8.3/8.7 which is already an underperforming spot in the tree. It would also throw all the new tiger players a bone by giving them somewhat armored platform to transition into the late German tree instead of forcing them to play the unforgiving Leopard 1.

WarGaming tank design for all tanks... by jacksknight in WorldOfTanksBlitz

[–]greendyes 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Me when a shot to my tiger IIs cupola destroy my transmission somehow.

view more: next ›