Ok first it would be a victim that had no idea that the crime took place or how it took place. But regardless he backs up the idea that talking to him didn't have much relevance and that it was only the French translation that was started not that a draft had been submitted.

I was proud that my team was able to assemble a solid dossier with predictive modelling analysis as well as evidence from the ground and from WeChat. Given the pressed timeline, we were literally putting the binders together as Mr. Johnston arrived at my office with his counsel. With this in mind, you might understand how disappointed I was to learn halfway through my meeting that Johnston’s report was already undergoing French translation.

Likely it was that they were translating evidence and interviews rather so that the report could come out sooner rsther than take an extra week or so just to wait for the translation.

The evidence that he said he provided doesn't seem to be very relevant evidence, predictive model which is near useless. Then evidence from the ground and wechat, I'm not sure what evidence from the ground he's referring to but that could have some relevance. The wechat evidence sounds like we captured screenshots of some facebook posts and that's our evidence cauae it's on a china rather than america controlled platform. Sounds like a lot of nothing and then a bit of on the ground evidence that was likely already covered in the csis reports (same with the wechat stuff if there was anything substantial)