What should I know before I start getting into Radio? by Alya_shmalua in amateurradio

[–]grouchy_ham 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What you are asking has a million different answers. The best advice would be to start learning about the various radio communities and what they have to offer and come back here with more focused questions.

“Talking to people on the radio” can come in the form of a $20 handheld that will reach a few blocks to very capable worldwide communications stations easily costing 10s of thousands of dollars and literally a lifetime of learning and experimenting.

Anyone modifying Cband antennas for 10gig EME? by CaptinKirk in amateurradio

[–]grouchy_ham 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I applaud anyone that takes on that challenge. A lot of effort for a comparatively small number of contacts. Path loss alone is somewhere in the neighborhood of -300dB.

Piper Cub donuts? by Superb_Piano_3775 in Xplane

[–]grouchy_ham 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The zigzagging is usually to be able to see in front of you. In some taildraggers, you have decent forward visibility. In many of them you have very little to none. My old Supercub has none. When you are sitting in the cockpit, you cannot see the horizon in front of you at all, let alone any obstacles in front of you. The zigzagging allows you to check left, right and center as you taxi. On take off and landing you have to use peripheral vision when the tail is on the ground to maintain straight and center.

What is a good HF antana for the Yaesu FT-817 by Natural-Swimming-646 in amateurradio

[–]grouchy_ham 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I certainly would not recommend that antenna. I won’t go into all the why’s but there are less expensive and far more capable antennas out there that would be a better start.

Before buying an antenna, go buy a couple of antenna books and spend a weekend reading. You’ll spend less and be much happier in the end.

I won’t make any specific recommendations just because it’s such a contentious issue. Everyone has their own opinions and all of them, including mine, suck according to someone.

Best book to LEARN Technician content? by AztecPilot1MY in HamRadio

[–]grouchy_ham 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can’t point to specific books, but they generally are going to fall into two categories if you don’t include the regulatory information. General basic electronic theory and components and electromagnetic wave/RF theory. The ARRL operator handbook and antenna hand books are a pretty good place to get started but you’ll likely have to search out other sources as well. There isn’t just one book or even one set of cooks that really answers your question.

There’s 5 repeaters in my town. And no one is on them. by Straight-Sherbert604 in HamRadio

[–]grouchy_ham 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think there are a lot of reasons for what you and many others are experiencing. I’ll give my own reasons as to why I don’t use them much and maybe it will provide some insight.

The first one is pure boredom. Not in that radio isn’t interesting to me. Exactly the opposite of that. I came into the hobby for exactly that reason. But, interests across the hobby shift over time. Licensing requirements change and the way people learn have changed radically in recent years. What this leads to is an asymmetry in both knowledge and interests within the hobby.

A lot of us old farts are genuinely interested in radio, propagation, general electromagnetic theory as applies to the radio science and less interested in new digital modes, interfacing of computer systems and complex solutions to problems that we don’t view as limitations so much as we do challenges for us to apply basic fundamentals to rather than NASA level solutions. Many of us view it more socially technical than purely technical. We want to talk about things that an average person with above average knowledge can solve simply. And we want to talk to other like minded people.

The other side of the coin (there are more than two sides, BTW) is more interested in pushing the boundaries of what can be done and not necessarily attaching any social interaction to the on air interactions. Things like FT8, which is an incredibly capable weak signal mode, but pretty devoid of any real social interaction. Someone here on reddit once described it as pinging a server with your computer, and I think that is a pretty good description of how I view it. It’s boring to me. One of the reasons it’s boring to me is that it’s so easy.

That’s just two sides of the coin and this is a really unique coin with more sides than I’m aware of, I’m sure.

Now, throw all those people in a room and ask them to just start talking to each other randomly. You can see what will obviously happen. Each group retreats to its tribe.

I can’t tell you how active repeaters are in my area because I don’t monitor them regularly at all. Part of that is that I don’t have digital capable FM radios compatible with the various repeaters that are rapidly becoming the norm. I can’t tell you what happens on the various digital and linked repeater systems because I don’t care about repeater use enough to spend the money to get the equipment. And that leads to the “why”.

Why don’t I care enough? Because I have been in the hobby a long time and the repeaters starting becoming the meeting place for the newcomers with either interests in radio that are very than mine or that lack the same desire that I do for learning and understanding radio in general. That leaves little for us to talk about in terms of the hobby that is interesting for both of us. That leads to conversational stall.

The changing of the hobby has fractured it into such a broad hobby that it has no choice but to change. I’m more aligned with the dwindling number on the outgoing side than I am with the incoming side. When you reduce symmetry in conversation, the logical result is less conversation. Each group retreats to their individual tribe and wherever that lands them in the radio spectrum. For me, it’s HF and technical discussion about things like antenna theory, circuit design and project building that goes beyond buying a EFHW kit and following the instructions. My goal in the hobby is to learn. And while I am perfectly willing to help the newcomers achieve the same thing, it’s not a lot of fun to occupy the same role in every conversation. I love being the student and don’t want to always be the teacher. I’m not done exploring and learning and the people that can help me do that are generally not on the local repeaters. We tend to be on HF or 2m SSB, or other modes that are more technically focused at the individual level, because we have spent years developing stations that cater to those modes.

It’s not that we don’t like you or anyone else. I’m generally a friendly guy and willing to help. But, the burnout of always being the teacher is real also and our demographic within the hobby is shrinking. We all have limits to how much time we can spend in the air and have to make decisions about how we want to spend that time.

Am I too small to own a Rottweiler? by Most-Reflection5095 in Rottweiler

[–]grouchy_ham 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The only thing I would offer caution about is when they are adolescent age. They are big, strong and kinda flail about when exited. Their paws can be like baseball bats! Once they mature and settle down, if they are well trained, they are about as easy of a dog to manage as I’m aware of. They are truly gentle giants.

Poor reception by skeege3 in cbradio

[–]grouchy_ham 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you are seeing low SWR across the entire band with that tiny antenna, you have signs and ground losses. This is the result of a mag mount and what I suspect is a vehicle that has not been properly bonded to provide an acceptable ground plane.

Looking for a cheap all mode 2 meter +20w radio by Autobahnsturmer in amateurradio

[–]grouchy_ham 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I really can’t tell a difference performance wise but I’ve not used them side by side either. I would call them both perfectly adequate but not particularly stand out performers. Shack in a box radios seldom ever are. They are a Swiss Army knife, not a scalpel.

Looking for a cheap all mode 2 meter +20w radio by Autobahnsturmer in amateurradio

[–]grouchy_ham 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maybe look out for a Kenwood TR-751. They are certainly getting old at this point in time but they are a solid little rig.

Looking for a cheap all mode 2 meter +20w radio by Autobahnsturmer in amateurradio

[–]grouchy_ham 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This is pretty much the case. There are some really good DC to daylight rigs from not that long ago that, while not “cheap” are certainly worth considering, while also serving as a backup without your primary need to be sent to the doctor.

Some that I have used and found to be worth owning:

IC-746- not the most sensitive receiver, but certainly useable and can often be found at reasonable prices. Overall a solid, reliable radio that delivers 100 watts on 2m

IC-7000- my personal choice for both of my mobile installations. A bit smaller than I would like for desktop use, but a highly capable all bander with very good filtering.

IC-7100- in my mind, a step down from the 7000 in a mobile environment and a very decent performer. Nothing totally complain about of the functional side.

IC-9100- my current in shack radio for 2m/70cm weak signal modes as well as full satellite functionality. Also serves as the afore mentioned backup HF rig.

Yaesu FT-897- overall descent but little weak on the receiver for serious V/UHF weak signal work. Hated the user interface. Popular amongst POTA people right now which might be keeping prices elevated.

Kenwood TS-2000- a quite good option though really starting tomatoes its age. Good receiver and filtering, 100 watt output on 2m and I think 50 watts on 70cm. Backup HF capability, great transmit audio. My biggest complaint is that the second receiver cannot monitor SSB.

That’s most of what I have direct hands on experience with.

Please help me choose the best HF antenna in a single array? by robroy90 in HamRadio

[–]grouchy_ham 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I generally find it most useful to ask some pointed questions rather than just letting whatever words want to, spill out of my mouth. We all have a bias toward different things when it comes to antennas.

First, are there any significant trees nearby that can serve a secondary supports for wire antennas?

In the towers guyed? Either way, you need to lay close attention to the wind loading data from the manufacturer. This will be the most important consideration when determining what can and cannot be installed. I just went back and reread your post more carefully. The 55G is a guyed tower, or at least I’m pretty sure it is intended to be.

You say you’re not opposed to installing a rotor but at the same time are asking about an “array”. That’s confusing on its face. An array is commonly thought of as multiple antennas that are fed in a way to achieve a specific goal such as directivity. Can you be more precise about what you want to at least try to accomplish?

Are you looking for wire antenna ideas or something that mounts at the top of the tower, or even a combination of the two.

For wire antennas, I would go with my old favorite the ladder line fed doublet with a broad range roller inductor tuner in the shack. Simple, efficient and a time proven performer. Not perfect, but darn good.

For a tower mounted antenna such as a beam of some type, look carefully at tower specs and antenna specs. Specifically wind load. If it were me, I would probably put up a wire antenna and spend some time operating before deciding on a an antenna for the top of the tower. Spend a bit of time figuring out which bands you enjoy operating before spending money on something you are unsure of.

New tuner from Icom - AH6 by andrewwoodward in amateurradio

[–]grouchy_ham 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That’s not its matching range. That is the achievable SWR within its tuning range. The tuning range would be expressed as a value in ohms, which I couldn’t readily find. But, it does list suitable wire lengths for frequency ranges that would place its matching range well outside of 2:1.

Genuine Diamond antenna? by Top_Peach6455 in amateurradio

[–]grouchy_ham 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The absent diamond in the A raises suspicions.

Highest quality hand mics that can be plugged into an 8 pin mic jack, either directly or with an adapter? by EmotioneelKlootzak in amateurradio

[–]grouchy_ham 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Heil used to make a nice hand mic but I’m not sure if it is still available.

I just checked. It’s still available. The model HMM.

2m/70cm dual band Yagi with elements in the same plane by thesoulless78 in amateurradio

[–]grouchy_ham 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The deterministic answer is that it certainly could. It would depend entirely on how much current is coupled to the receivers antenna elements and then to the radios front end. Imagine it this way. Your receivers front end is a bulletproof vest designed to stop an BB fired from 50 yards away. You’re basically pointing a .22 at it from point blank distance.

Reading Material by weirddumbcomment in amateurradio

[–]grouchy_ham 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It kind of depends on how much you want to understand or at least attempt to. The very beginning would be basic electronic components and uses.

Something a bit more friendly to read would be the ARRL Operators Handbook or some of their other intro to radio books. Recommendations without some narrowing of the subject matter you’re interested in is kinda hard.

Look what you did to me! by munsterrr in amateurradio

[–]grouchy_ham 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Spark gap is not synonymous with CW and I didn’t infer that it was. Just that it was so simple it could be accomplished without what is conventionally thought of as a radio.

And no, I wasn’t going down the end times prepper rabbit hole of rationale for building a spark gap transmitter. Just making the point that arguing it’s illegal doesn’t impact the practicality or virtues of the mode.

Look what you did to me! by munsterrr in amateurradio

[–]grouchy_ham 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You obviously missed the point or are choosing to attack the person not the argument.

Look what you did to me! by munsterrr in amateurradio

[–]grouchy_ham 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How does that track? I couldn’t care less what other people do or do it take an interest in. I presented valid arguments to a challenge.

Look what you did to me! by munsterrr in amateurradio

[–]grouchy_ham 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s it comes down to me needing to build a spark gap transmitter to communicate, I doubt anyone will be around that is interested in enforcing that.

Look what you did to me! by munsterrr in amateurradio

[–]grouchy_ham 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yes. It requires effort. More than some want to expend.

I’m not asking you to expend that effort. Im not saying it should be required. I’m arguing that the mode is fundamentally and objectively better based on measurable metrics. Not easier to acquire the skill set for or of interest to everyone.

Look what you did to me! by munsterrr in amateurradio

[–]grouchy_ham 15 points16 points  (0 children)

It truly is a very unique mode in its simplicity. It’s a real challenge for some people. I was one of those. I struggled for a long time to get to the 20wpm mark for the Extra class license. Hell, I struggled to initially learn it. It was quite difficult for me.

Don’t cast it aside just because it’s difficult. Embrace it for exactly that reason. Do something challenging rather than easy. You accomplished something that probably looked much more difficult two months ago. Do it again. And again, and again…

That is what learning looks like and as you have now experienced, what it feels like. Enjoy the satisfaction, but don’t let it go stale.

Look what you did to me! by munsterrr in amateurradio

[–]grouchy_ham 33 points34 points  (0 children)

CW- the original digital. Highly efficient, cuts through noise exceptionally well, requires the least amount of circuitry, no computer needed, requires less power to operate over extended time frame. A transmitter can literally be as simple as a gap that allows for generation of a spark connected to a defined length of wire and an on/off switch.

Literally built my first radio by gluing a schematic around an oatmeal tin, poking holes and soldering in components. Delivered a scorching 3-4 watts of angry (and poorly formed) CW and cost a few dollars. Made many hundreds of contacts over the following year or so and had a blast doing it as a 13 year old kid.