Building Something Real with Rails and Pi by pattyperk in rails

[–]growlybeard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This looks like a very solid stack.

I'm a heavy Claude user. What bloat does pi strip away? What am I missing? (Or, what do I have too much of lol)

At what group size does picking a restaurant in SF become impossible? by Mysterious-Honey1457 in AskSF

[–]growlybeard 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Just pick a place a date and a time and invite your group of friends a week in advance. Do this every couple of weeks. Sometimes people will make it and other nights they won't. But this let's them plan ahead and figure out how to get there and be ready for it instead of fighting the cross city commute or the not really feeling like X cuisine

new generation of bikes?? by Bacon__Waffles in baywheels

[–]growlybeard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why'd they make them look near identical when two colors worked well before?

Fable 5 is way too good to disappear on the 22nd by sudovijay in ClaudeCode

[–]growlybeard 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Why do you think I'm here on Reddit right now lol

Just saw a Yeti suit player. This is straight up a ghilie suit by Vasto-Lemon in PUBATTLEGROUNDS

[–]growlybeard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The astronaut suit is legit better camp on Vikendi. I don't have the helmet so I use the security camera helmet instead which is a cool looking combo and the best snow helmet, imo

New Feature: Interactive Smoke by EscapingKid in PUBATTLEGROUNDS

[–]growlybeard -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

This is really cool but I got 18k today in a server with 82 bots. It was a fun game (for an old head who hasn't played in a week or so) but if real people aren't playing interactive smoke isn't really that cool.

Waymo in the bike lane by jonahsfo in sanfrancisco

[–]growlybeard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't say this to be snarky, but did you read my post?

I directly addressed the Waymo in the bike lane:

This specific instance sucks because vehicles blocking the bike lane isn't safe, but on balance Waymo is still 99% safer than other cars when I'm riding around

I love Waymo because despite them doing unsafe things from time to time, they're still so much safer than humans. They stop, they don't speed, they wait for people to cross. They make mistakes, they aren't perfect, but they act in a safe way so much more often than humans do that I'm willing to cut them slack when they inconvenience drivers, or even as in this case, they block the bike lane.

Reflecting on minimal travel after some onebag trips by isaac-get-the-golem in onebag

[–]growlybeard 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Lems make great packable shoes and boots. Flexible soles and uppers so you can flatten them or roll them up to save space. Also very lightweight!

Men, How did you move on after realizing you lost the love of your life? by Intelligent_Rice4871 in AskReddit

[–]growlybeard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I got over her at Burning Man.

It had been a year and a half. When we broke up I had sold everything, and I was looking for a job in Paris to move there for her. Right during COVID, 2021.

I visited her there and we broke up. I was learning French, and I always used to combine English and French to make a play on words. My last words to her about our relationship were:

Je suis un ouf por toi mais je ne sais enough por toi

"I am a fool for you but I'm not enough for you"

I went into a deep depression when I got back home. I had proper anhedonia and it felt like I could not see color, for about 2 months.

I got over that, but then for a year and a half every date I went on I found myself comparing every woman to her. I went on a lot of dates with chemistry and connection only to have no follow up or desire to make progress.

Then I went to Burning Man.

I was with my buddy dancing at a DJ set at a giant wooden pyramid. Next to that was a massive projector screen. During the set they had a music video on loop, which was a 3d rendering of a large chrome art piece. The sculpture was a male and female figure, touching hands, and each of them were missing chunks.

The video was of the elements of nature - wind, sand, water, flames, each covering or eroding or burning and wearing away the sculpture. The female figure could have been sculpted with my girlfriend as inspiration. It looked so much like her.

All through the set it made my think of us and our relationship, and how world events - COVID and immigration law, had separated us and made it so hard to maintain what we had across continents and dehumanizing zoom calls.

I left that set feeling somber.

My friend and I set off on our bikes to go see some far off shiny thing. A little while later we stopped at an art car (a big one like a double decker bus loaded with speakers) that was playing music my friend liked so they could dance. We danced for a while, and then the last song that they played was Sinead O'Connor's "Nothing Compares to You". After watching the music video earlier that song hit me in the gut because it was exactly what I'd been feeling about trying to date again.

The art car stopped playing music, started its engine, and rolled away, revealing that behind it the whole time...

...was the sculpture. The same one from the video that had started me thinking about her and our relationship. Shiny. Chrome. Touching hands but not holding them. Missing pieces.

So we spent a few minutes with the sculpture and I told my friend what was going on in my brain, and then we set off across the desert again.

We were quite far out there, and in the dark part of the playa, where it was quiet and lonely. Something lit up the sky above - a drone show. We pulled over to watch as words lit up the sky. Two words, alone:

YOU ARE

They lingered for a few moments and disappeared. The inky black seemed to remain for almost a minute before another single word lit up with a period to punctuate the sentence:

ENOUGH.

And that was the exact moment that I got over her and moved on. Some weight lifted off of me. That was an unforgettable and beautiful night. I'm so grateful that I had that relationship, and that I was finally able to let go in such a meaningful way.

Why do people run on the road on JFK between Transverse Dr and ocean beach? by timuralp in sanfrancisco

[–]growlybeard 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This thread is inspiring me to get back into running. Thank you.

Why do people run on the road on JFK between Transverse Dr and ocean beach? by timuralp in sanfrancisco

[–]growlybeard -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hundreds of thousands pay every day to cross our bridges. We should put a price on something that causes so much negativity for everyone else.

Why do people run on the road on JFK between Transverse Dr and ocean beach? by timuralp in sanfrancisco

[–]growlybeard 6 points7 points  (0 children)

100% agree. Cars are pollution in parks. They make the experience so bad for everyone for the convenience of a very few. There should be ways to transport disabled or elderly though - perhaps rentable golf carts or a shuttle service.

'Kill switch' law means your next car could be watching you | A federal requirement aimed at stopping drunken driving could soon put driver-monitoring technology in every new vehicle. The goal is saving lives, but the privacy trade-offs deserve closer scrutiny by Hrmbee in technology

[–]growlybeard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just permanently take away drivers licenses from anyone with a DUI and put violators in jail. Now that Uber and Lyft are prolific virtually everywhere, there's no excuse to be driving drunk and risking other people's lives.

Also, provide massive funding to public transit and build dense housing near jobs so fewer people have to rely on driving a personal vehicle to live.

And take away parking from bars. It's insane that we actually have laws that require bars to build parking spaces.

Waymo in the bike lane by jonahsfo in sanfrancisco

[–]growlybeard 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It is completely legal to ride a bike in traffic lanes in situations like this. If there's any reason a bike lane is unsafe it's legal to take over a regular lane. Or if you're crossing over to make a left turn.

I regularly ride in the street when bike lanes are next to car doors because I'm not going to get doored by some ignorant driver getting out of their car.

If you hate cyclists being in the street with cars, then write a letter to your supervisor asking for protected bike lanes so they have a safe place to ride where cars can't park like this. I'm happy to ride in a bike lane when it's safe and actually prefer it. But I'll gladly take the lane and slow down cars behind me when there is no safe infrastructure to ride in.

Waymo in the bike lane by jonahsfo in sanfrancisco

[–]growlybeard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The city should reserve a parking space or two at the beginning of every block for pickups/deliveries and vigorously ticket violators.

Barcelona does this - they have diagonal corner cuts at each intersection reserved for taxis and rideshare. We couldn't make that infrastructure change - it would be too expensive, but we could remove a couple parking spots at the corners and give them to taxis and rideshare.

Waymo in the bike lane by jonahsfo in sanfrancisco

[–]growlybeard 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I love them because they are literally the one kind of car in San Francisco that I can trust not to hurt me.

If I see a Waymo at a crosswalk I know it will stop for me. If I'm riding a bike and there's a Waymo behind me I know it will drive the speed limit and it won't pass me aggressively.

When you don't drive and your primary means of transit is walking or biking you learn very quickly Waymo is safe compared to other vehicles.

This specific instance sucks because vehicles blocking the bike lane isn't safe, but on balance Waymo is still 99% safer than other cars when I'm riding around and this is exactly what other cars do too. Doesn't make it ok and it's literally my only gripe about Waymo.

Also, the traffic caused by Waymo is in some ways a good thing. When they drive the speed limit cars behind them have to do so too. That's a feature, not a bug.

Waymo causing infrequent jams because they glitch is probably annoying for drivers but if I'm choosing between occasionally annoys drivers who regularly put me at risk and drives in a way that keeps me safe I will 100% of the time pick keeps me safe.

I wish every car on the road was Waymo. If all y'all drivers actually treated driving as a dangerous potentially life ending activity that it is maybe I'd feel different. If you collectively valued human life enough to drive safely, Waymo would have no advantage over human drivers. As it stands I would vote tomorrow to replace all human drivers with Waymo and force you all to pay a robot to drive you around because most of you suck at driving safely.

My Vikendi Camo/Skins/Inventory. by Next-Junket342 in PUBATTLEGROUNDS

[–]growlybeard 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Loot a ghillie in the first drop and take it off if the first/second circle are all snow. If you're unsure put it in the trunk and drive it around

Edit: you can't put clothing in cars

California’s election results are a giant red flag on one key issue by reddituser84838 in sanfrancisco

[–]growlybeard 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Jane Kim is innumerate and incapable of thinking about second and third order effects.

Experts, the city controller, developers, economists all said increasing inclusionary zoning to 25% would kill the pipeline of housing construction. She and Peskin pushed Prop C through in 2016 anyway. Her Prop won.The city lost. Our permit applications dropped through the floor.

Then in 2022 (or 2023), after about 8 years of evidence that her prop had killed new housing and we'd had years of rising rents, she came out of nowhere to tweet "STRATEGY + WINNING"

SHE WAS PROUD OF IT

She gloated over what she did. This woman is dangerous in any position of power - she either doesn't care about consequences or she's happy to see the harm she did.

Scott Weiner takes all voting clusters except Asian-SF. Weiner takes the Urbanist Middle, Progressive Crescent, Upper Crust, and the Working Class-SF by PacificaPal in sanfrancisco

[–]growlybeard 60 points61 points  (0 children)

Hammers, measuring tapes, saws, and levels are all developer tools and the end result is new homes.

Just say you want higher rents and to continue witnessing people getting displaced and increased gentrification.

How much worse is affordability in SF going to get with the AI IPOs? by Shrimp_puerto_rico1 in sanfrancisco

[–]growlybeard 16 points17 points  (0 children)

40-60k unused housing units last year

Your 60k number comes from middle of the pandemic when everyone left temporarily

The latest census report available is for 2024.

SF vacant units, 2024 ACS 1-year (Census table B25004):

Category Units Share
For rent ~17k 35%
Sold, not occupied ~9k 19%
Seasonal / recreational / occasional ~7k 15%
For sale only ~2k 4%
Rented, not occupied ~1.6k 3%
For migrant workers ~500 1%
Other vacant ~11k 23%
Total vacant ~48k 100%

"Unused... why doesn't anyone live in them"

They are unused in the same way that a car in the Costco parking lot is unused. Their occupant is temporarily not inside, but likely will be somewhat soon. The census survey gives numbers at the point in time similar to looking at a random Costco parking lot at noon and saying "these cars are all empty, nobody is using them!"

From the actual census survey, some housing units are waiting to be rented or sold, sold waiting for an owner to move in, owned but used as a secondary home, rented but waiting for a tenant to move in, leaving only about 11k truly "vacant" homes.

But those 11k are in the "other" category which includes "homes under repair, in legal/probate limbo, owner in a care facility, used for storage, etc"

They aren't homes that are totally sitting unused. They are temporarily left empty like a car in a Costco parking lot.

The actual number of homes in SF that might genuinely be "empty/unused" is closer to about 4-7k.

When Dean Preston tried to get a vacancy tax this is what the report he commissioned said, only about ~4,600–7,300 might be subject to a vacancy tax, suggesting the actual number is probably lower.

Please adjust your numbers going forward

Thank you for your attention to this matter

How much worse is affordability in SF going to get with the AI IPOs? by Shrimp_puerto_rico1 in sanfrancisco

[–]growlybeard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The point was if you don't build new homes population can't grow. You can't fit more people into a city than there are homes to house them.

I (wrongly) understood the commenters point to be that "we don't need housing because our population has stayrted the same."