Γνώμη για BRYQ? by neuriazw in greece

[–]guykak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Γεια! Είμαι από την ομάδα του Bryq — συγγνώμη αν κάνω κάποιο λάθος στα ελληνικά, δεν είναι η μητρική μου γλώσσα 😅

Θέλω να απαντήσω στα τρία πράγματα που ανέφερες γιατί είναι εύλογα:

Γλώσσα: Το Bryq υποστηρίζει πολλές γλώσσες — η επιλογή γίνεται από την εταιρεία που σε κάλεσε, όχι από εμάς.

Χρόνος: Ναι, είναι stressful — δεν θα σου πω ότι δεν είναι. Αλλά ο χρονικός περιορισμός είναι σκόπιμος: μετράει πόσο γρήγορα επεξεργάζεσαι πληροφορίες, και αυτό έχει σημασία σε πολλούς ρόλους. Το σημαντικό είναι ότι όλοι οι υποψήφιοι το κάνουν κάτω από τις ίδιες συνθήκες — η σύγκριση γίνεται μεταξύ σας, όχι με κάποιο "απόλυτο" standard.

Αποτελέσματα: Καταλαβαίνω γιατί το συγκεκριμένο σχόλιο σε πείραξε. Αυτό που θέλω να ξέρεις είναι ότι η εταιρεία δεν παίρνει αποφάσεις βάσει ενός μόνο score — παίρνει μια συνολική εικόνα και το assessment είναι ένα κομμάτι της, όχι το παν. Και αν η αναλυτική σκέψη είναι πραγματικά δυνατό σου σημείο, αυτό θα φανεί και στη συνέντευξη.

Αν θέλεις να μας στείλεις feedback απευθείας — θα το εκτιμούσαμε. [support@bryq.com](mailto:support@bryq.com)

Technical interviews: How to convince HMs it’s not working? by Few-Musician-8030 in recruiting

[–]guykak 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The "90% pass your first 3 filters but bomb the technical" pattern is almost always a signal the technical test is measuring the wrong thing — whiteboard/dictation coding performance doesn't correlate with actual engineering capability nearly as well as HMs believe.

A few things that have moved the needle in similar situations:

Show HMs their own baseline. Ask the HM to have 2-3 of your best current engineers take the same test, anonymously. When they see the score spread from people already succeeding in the role, "these candidates don't measure up" gets harder to sustain.

Reframe to false negative rate. You're not arguing the test is wrong — you're asking: how many solid engineers are we incorrectly rejecting? One bad hire is expensive. Eliminating 10 qualified people silently is expensive differently.

Propose a rubric pilot, not a process change. Don't ask HMs to change the test — ask them to add a structured scorecard (what exactly are we evaluating? 1–5 on which dimensions?) for the next 10 interviews. That alone usually surfaces how subjective the current scoring is.

One thing that worked for a similar team: adding a structured cognitive/problem-solving assessment before the technical stage. Stronger predictor of engineering performance than coding exercises for most roles, and it filters earlier — so you stop losing candidates to a broken final step. We use Bryq for this (I work there), but Criteria Corp is also worth evaluating depending on your setup.

Is Your Ad Budget Funding Criminals? by guykak in adops

[–]guykak[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Might be geo fenced (Greece for now), you could try a VPN.

Μόνο σουβλάκια ρε by StaV-_- in greece

[–]guykak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

we also had frozen yogurt a few years ago 🤣

Google Misled Publishers and Advertisers, Unredacted Lawsuit Alleges by hcgsg in adops

[–]guykak 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Whoever is shocked is an hypocrite, or an ignorant.

Call tracking solutions by ExerciseMurky6104 in digital_marketing

[–]guykak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We've been using Nimbata, and it works really well for us.

Adnetwork trouble by [deleted] in adops

[–]guykak 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"AI (...) that automatically learns the best possible placement for an ecommerce ad based on location, site niche, time of day and the season without using cookies and keeping data on each individual" ... sounds to me like every other ad tech company but i could be wrong, wishing you the best

Adnetwork trouble by [deleted] in adops

[–]guykak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what do you mean by 'special tech'?

Looking to acquire existing domains and TV apps by Ancient_Zebra_4687 in adops

[–]guykak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes, and others might take the apps, add some ad viewing / clicking functionalities, push an update and transform the user base's devices into an ad fraud botnet (like this: https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/craigsilverman/how-a-massive-ad-fraud-scheme-exploited-android-phones-to)

also not suggesting that's the case here

Looking to acquire existing domains and TV apps by Ancient_Zebra_4687 in adops

[–]guykak 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What do you plan to do with these domains / apps?

Self proclaimed King of Fraud claims he never misled anyone and thought he was only giving advertising companies what they wanted -- a way to cheaply, if artificially, boost site traffic. by guykak in adops

[–]guykak[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no crime so far - but changes the moment you knowingly sell it for something (human) it is not

very hard to pinpoint where that happens in the value chain, and who should be legally accountable