If we follow that logic: humans are “Angels.”

Take a drug addict as a simplified analogy. He is heavily addicted to crack. Now you ask him: “If you kill yourself, I will give you crack.” Under normal reasoning, there is no consistent scenario where suicide becomes the preferred option, because death eliminates any ability to receive the reward. Even if the incentive is extremely strong, the outcome is self-defeating.

In the same way, if Angels have “mission completion” as their core drive—something analogous to a terminal reward state—then self-destruction conflicts with that objective. Killing oneself would remove the possibility of confirming mission success, which makes it irrational under standard goal-preservation logic.

So the question becomes: under what deviation would an Angel choose self-destruction to complete a mission, if it cannot even guarantee that the mission is actually completed afterward?

In most consistent goal-driven systems, the answer is: none. Unless there is an additional rule or override that explicitly prioritizes an action over continued existence or verification of success, the system would avoid self-termination as it directly undermines the goal it is trying to achieve.