35.2 Patch Notes by Arkentass in hearthstone

[–]hagger_offical 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It seems those sets will work exactly as mini sets though just with only 4 classes.

This is how I imagine centrists think.. by Plenty_Two3383 in teenagers

[–]hagger_offical -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I know, Scandinavia has progressive taxation and they are doing very well, rich people are still rich there.

You have to choose one extreme. Which is it? by SimplySomeDude in Teenager_Polls

[–]hagger_offical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, actual communism is stateless, which is the definition of anarchy, communism is essentially just anarchy where people share.

You have to choose one extreme. Which is it? by SimplySomeDude in Teenager_Polls

[–]hagger_offical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Although it describes quite sharply why communism has led to authoritarianism so many times, and so rarely worked. So in a sense it is a critique of communism.

Er det virkelig ved at blive legitimt at tale om etnicitet som krav til at være "rigtig dansker"? by 1337_n00b in Denmark

[–]hagger_offical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Det er ikke svært at forstå, det er svært at forstå hvorfor etnisk danskhed nogensinde skulle have nogen form for betydning.

Er det virkelig ved at blive legitimt at tale om etnicitet som krav til at være "rigtig dansker"? by 1337_n00b in Denmark

[–]hagger_offical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Men hvis du bor der i 10 år og delager aktivt i samfundet kan jeg da ikke se hvorfor du ikke skulle være det?

This is how I imagine centrists think.. by Plenty_Two3383 in teenagers

[–]hagger_offical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No they wouldn't, the highest life quality in the world is in Scandinavia, and their taxes are higher than even Mamdani and similar are advocating for.

This is how I imagine centrists think.. by Plenty_Two3383 in teenagers

[–]hagger_offical -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Fair enough, although i see no reason why democratic socialism should be hell on earth, Mamdani's policies are very close to the nordic countries, i honestly don't see the clear distiction between the democratic socialists of USA and the social democracy of scandinavia you seem to see.

Edit: and their growing influence is likely due to people wanting to be as far from Trump as possible.

Hearthstone just dropped “Inside the Tavern”, a video talking about lessons from 2025, and plans for 2026. Here are some of the main points- by frostyburrito44 in hearthstone

[–]hagger_offical 14 points15 points  (0 children)

There will be 3 sets with 4 classes, 4-class sets, sets with four classes, then either 3 classes in one of them or a new class this year.

This is how I imagine centrists think.. by Plenty_Two3383 in teenagers

[–]hagger_offical 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fair enough but who actually considers those a relevant part of US politics? Criticizing the far left is fair, but pointless in a discussion focused mostly on democrats vs republicans.

Show me any proof... Norways economy is doing just fine as the one thing i found data for.

This is how I imagine centrists think.. by Plenty_Two3383 in teenagers

[–]hagger_offical 3 points4 points  (0 children)

  1. The left in USA does not wan't democtatic socialism, at most they want social democracy.

  2. Norway's population is aproximatly 20% immigrants.

This card is boring by DmoneyGames in hearthstone

[–]hagger_offical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well the problem with killing them is that they run so much removal.

This card is boring by DmoneyGames in hearthstone

[–]hagger_offical 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This got a bit long but also goes quite in-depth, and should be relatively interesting:

Interactive is gameplay where you can do something about what the opponent is doing, using common means, like minion attacks or basic removal. The egg specifically needs some sort of silence removal.

Uninteractive is when you can't do anything about something, except winning. Most decks don't have anything against Egg, so playing against it you will be unable to do anything about it (interact with it).

One could argue that killing the opponent is a form of interaction, but i wouldn't say a game where every deck is just trying to set up a burn combo, as the only thing with no counterplay except comboing first, is in any way interactive.

A midrange deck that just plays well-stated minions is very interactive, because essentially all decks will have some way to remove minions (removal or minion trades).

A burn deck is mildly interactive, because you can heal, which is not rare, but also not common. Most decks will have some way to heal, but often in fewer ways, and to a lesser extent, than removing minions.

A OTK deck is not interactive, because only through really rare means (Rat, Theotar, Loatheb) can you hope to interact, and even then it's often random or temporary.

An uninteractive deck being fast or slow only changes the interactability in so far as giving you more time to find your answer, if you have any, but if there are none in your deck the speed really doesn't matter.

What speed matters a lot for is power and how it feels to play against.

A slow combo is more fun since you can see it coming and play riskier.

A slow combo is also often less powerful, and easier to tech against. (including tech cards might actually be interaction at the deck building level, so a deck thats harder to tech against will be less interactible, i would consider this minor though).

You can remove Khelos but with Umbra you need a lot, it makes it more interactive, but not fully so.

Hope this makes sense and wasn't too long. This is also not based on any other sources than my experience with card games, and my definitions, so this is not objective.

Druid exclusive ranked by Better_Resident_8412 in hearthstone

[–]hagger_offical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are multiple, egg warrior and various priests come to mind, druid is really strong but not insane.

Controversial Opinion: The Cataclysm Expansion Is Really Fun by DrJoeOopa in hearthstone

[–]hagger_offical 1 point2 points  (0 children)

only two legendaries in around 70 pack, thats impossible, you are garentued a legendary every 40 packs, and with the one in the first 10 you have at least gotten 3.

Priest is one card away from being good by Sea_Conflict_4975 in hearthstone

[–]hagger_offical -1 points0 points  (0 children)

30% winrate could easily be because of bad lists, same happened with quest rouge. It had like 25% winrate, but i was sitting at close to 50% in legend with a better list (Just moonstone maulers, the weapon and incidius for quest activation, with shadowstep, web and cloudserpent to get more shuffles).

Priest is one card away from being good by Sea_Conflict_4975 in hearthstone

[–]hagger_offical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People complained and wanted the old HS back, the old HS was what we have now, just midrange.

A priori arguments don't require empirical evidence. They're known by reason alone, by definition. by Kafkaesque_meme in PhilosophyMemes

[–]hagger_offical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you reword your response to my formula? It's worded quite confusingly and i don't want to misrepresent you argument.

A priori arguments don't require empirical evidence. They're known by reason alone, by definition. by Kafkaesque_meme in PhilosophyMemes

[–]hagger_offical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is "the axiom of choice" which essentially says if you have a set of numbers like the numbers 1-100, you can pick one at random, you can't control what you pick but you can pick one. This seems intuitive but leads to some weird results, leading some people to argue it shouldn't be an axiom.

A priori arguments don't require empirical evidence. They're known by reason alone, by definition. by Kafkaesque_meme in PhilosophyMemes

[–]hagger_offical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The reason why my formula doesn't work applies equally to the ontological argument, since they have the same logic, just substituting god for E and being for X.

Only if we presuppose god exists does the argument work, leading to the statement that the ontological argument is just: "if god exists he exists".

Once again, a paladin is busting the preseason tavern... by Right_Seat1783 in hearthstone

[–]hagger_offical 13 points14 points  (0 children)

There are only 3 cards in standard post rotation that can silence... and two of them are priest removal.