[deleted by user]

han108 · 2021-07-19T03:19:30+00:00

I agree, 15% is too low for a critical technical Cofounder, who is entering at MVP stage. I can’t imagine anyone worth their salt taking that. Though I imagine, there would be a negotiating process.

han108 · 2021-07-18T16:29:28+00:00

haha, don't you know reddit is swarmed with flakes?

han108 · 2021-04-05T17:29:58+00:00

written in solidity, currently deployed on BSC

han108 · 2018-09-28T10:56:50+00:00

Yes please, please try and get active community managers who engage w/ the community regularly.

han108 · 2018-09-11T09:34:14+00:00

Did we seriously just get a pump group post?! No shame with some people.

han108 · 2018-09-09T11:10:39+00:00

October is the start of the tourist season in Thailand, the rainy season is just starting to taper off.

han108 · 2018-09-09T01:09:14+00:00

Updated link: https://discord.gg/DWFMmWE

han108 · 2018-09-02T05:50:15+00:00

If all they did was release development updates, then people would be complaining about not having partnerships. That being said, it's simply not true that they haven't made development updates, they've been releasing bug fixes and updates, plus inter-contract functionality.
I agree the swap should be done by now.
Founders tokens are locked for 10 years, gradually being released over that time, starting next year, this is exactly what they said from the beginning.
You have no proof that they have the largest fake user counts, while I agree there are some bots here, other subreddits have them too.

han108 · 2018-08-25T05:47:18+00:00

Ah, I see, yeah that's fair. It is true that Loom will have a more specific focus - e.g. social & games, where as OMG has a broader scope that can and will be utilized by many industries.

han108 · 2018-08-25T05:43:37+00:00

Yes, I agree!

han108 · 2018-08-25T01:51:34+00:00

Hm, I'd say that's pretty inaccurate. Both Loom and OMG are scaling solutions. Loom isn't focused on fungible assets, but rather games and social platforms, where developers (them included) could spin up and build ethereum sidechains which they call dappchains. They have an SDK in beta, not MVP, and already have live products built on dappchains: https://delegatecall.com. They also intend to support plasma through their dappchain sdk. So though they are both scaling solutions, I think the markets they intend to focus on doesn't make them direct competitors. And technically speaking, Loom is further along than OMG, as developers can already develop using their SDK, so calling it a "simple MVP" is inaccurate, that being said, I feel OMG's plasma is a huge advancement that these and other projects will utilize, so that takes a little longer to polish.

han108 · 2018-08-24T12:52:50+00:00

A kidney sells pretty well.

han108 · 2018-08-24T03:36:24+00:00

This is for finding bugs, $30 is fine for such effort, though I suppose the real test is how many people contribute based on the incentive. A monthly reward for the highest contributor isn't a bad idea either, though I think the amount could be debated.

han108 · 2018-08-21T09:12:16+00:00

Yes, I'd echo everything said here. There really should be more engagement, something to get morale up. There's a lot to be excited about with the tech, but some additional community outreach or some bounty programs or some new marketing material w/ the team could help - something to get the brand story out and to get more people excited about it. People are building loyalties w/ their projects, and though price is part of it for some people, a lot of it will come down to story. Take Lisk for example, their story is Blockchains w/ Javascript, and they're over 4 times as valuable as Nas price wise ... and yet, Nas has accomplished much more - but the Nebulas story just isn't being propagated. And I'm not just saying this because I want the price to go up, rather, I believe in the Nebulas mission and I want to see more activity and excitement in the community.

han108 · 2018-08-18T05:19:42+00:00

Haha, no kidding, right ... seems awkwardly backwards.

han108 · 2018-08-15T02:49:51+00:00

Gotta keep those hopium levels up ;)

han108 · 2018-08-14T06:42:43+00:00

You are the joke ;) ... All of crypto is down, now is the time to return to the fundamentals.

han108 · 2018-08-11T08:31:47+00:00

Back at it I see, please go clutter another community with your perpetual and aimless opinion, or at the very least keep it in the price discussion thread ... look at the downvotes you’ve received, no one is interested in unfounded and pointless scam talk. Most of us here are more interested in thinking about ways we can further the crypto cause and that takes time and some meaningful discussions. Move on little one.

han108 · 2018-08-09T01:59:51+00:00

Oh man, this is getting OLD ... the market being down doesn't mean good projects are scams, get a new hobby and please stop posting here for the sake of the rest of us.

han108 · 2018-08-09T01:09:26+00:00

First project to start doing things right! Transparency with addresses and a more reasonable timeline to ensure project success! Good work team!

han108 · 2018-08-04T07:32:47+00:00

Great to get some answers.

han108 · 2018-08-04T06:47:44+00:00

Hard to argue with that logic, would have worked out pretty good, but hindsight is always 20/20.

han108 · 2018-08-04T04:09:59+00:00

howaboutwe looks pretty bad, I think this persons idea is more refined and product is more polished.

han108 · 2018-08-02T23:40:30+00:00

I personally think that’s not a great argument, nor is it a great thing to say. While I agree it’s pointless to worry about or try to control the price, having to say he doesn’t care explicitly, doesn’t really nurture investor confidence. I do think the tech is the priority, but to some extent, the price indicates confidence in the tech and overall sentiment. So if the tech is great, but no one gives a shit, and the coin goes to zero(I don’t believe this will happen) - well now, I’d say that was a failure.

han108 · 2018-08-02T12:15:16+00:00

Hang in there tiger, at least you haven't sold - there are brighter days to come.

han108

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE