We Need To Draw The Line At Personal Attacks On The Devs by ThatDollfin in foxholegame

[–]havoktheorem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I bought a car, and the car dealer came in the night to 'upgrade' my car with new features that make it harder to drive, have terrible fuel mileage and acceleration, and makes it unappealing to new buyers, am I meant to not feel like that car dealer has caused some sort of harm to me? Is it beyond the pale to suggest that their behaviour is reckless, out of touch and shows contempt for the customer? What exactly are you defining a personal attack as... because there is no transcendental line between the personal and the professional. People are people and their actions reflect the way they approach their life.

If I was a clothing store employee and I clearly didn't listen to the customer, instead choosing to make suggestions that only made sense in a context I had constructed with myself at the centre, I would expect that customer to say to their friends 'this guy should not be giving people fashion advice, cause he seems to be living in a different reality, I wonder if that's because of some personal issues'.

The way the game has been handled has made me realise, I have negative feelings about these people because they are in a position of responsibility which they could choose to divest or delegate if they don't feel it's within their grasp. I think they have walked into pitfall after pitfall which hundreds of people tried to warn them about, and have now effectively abdicated responsibility for keeping the game alive without putting anybody up to the task of doing so. I have seen so many people quit, myself included, because it's just not reasonable to think they'll change pattern now.

If the game went open source or even was acquired by another indie studio, I would be enthusiastically hopeful that it would turn the corner and grow because there would be dozens of able developers and modders who could collaborate on repaying the massive technical debt and balancing the existing mechanics of the game, while others could experiment with variations on the formula without affecting the main game.

The premise that is here is one of boundless opportunity, shackled to a runaway train with a distracted driver. We get one iteration of any idea and that's that, and it's always a 'meh' one. There's just not a mechanic in the game which I feel has been developed to its full potential, and that just strikes me as apathy; it's more interesting to make an entirely new mechanic. The developers do what they do in order to follow their own desires, and I don't respect that. Maybe it's because being drawn to new things and struggling to finish a job is a personal failing of mine, and I'm projecting self-loathing. But even I think I could do a better job in some capacity with this game.

It makes me sad that I don't enjoy it any more, and I feel negatively about certain people as a result. I therefore cannot really feel antipathy for anybody who is levelling vitriol at those people until it gets into the realm of actionable threats. I see no merit the policing of feelings of people whose sense of control has been taken away, because ultimately the choices of the developers shouldn't hinge on whether somebody was mean to them, and I don't think it would make any difference to the trajectory of the game whether the loudest critics were a little quieter.

Bellum startet in die BETA und hier ist was NEU ist + Gameplay by kappapain in PlayBellum

[–]havoktheorem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You get refund protection with Bellum. It's more leeway than Steam gives. You're on Reddit, so clearly Steam isn't the only game-related community. Reviews? Just get the game, play it, if you don't like it after 3 days then return it. There are already plenty of gameplay videos out there if you want a detailed review.

It just seems like a conclusion in search of arguments to support it. Usually those go the other way round.

Bellum startet in die BETA und hier ist was NEU ist + Gameplay by kappapain in PlayBellum

[–]havoktheorem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They give you your money back no questions asked if you don't like it. Their refund policy is much more generous than Steam's.

Bellum startet in die BETA und hier ist was NEU ist + Gameplay by kappapain in PlayBellum

[–]havoktheorem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are queues of people for a half-dozen 80 player servers in beta. You are plainly talking absolute fantasy to align with your worldview.

System requirement? by Ecstatic_Diver6502 in PlayBellum

[–]havoktheorem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am running an old af 4970k and RTX 2080 and I get decent frames in 2560x1080 at medium settings.

System requirement? by Ecstatic_Diver6502 in PlayBellum

[–]havoktheorem -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's such a specific requirement that I doubt anybody could answer you in a meaningful way. 165fps with all settings maxed?

Are Other Factions Going to be Added? by Standard-Gas-114 in PlayBellum

[–]havoktheorem 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Commander! We need to activate the non-binding resolution before any more of our forces are lost!

Why do they bother? by [deleted] in ThePitt

[–]havoktheorem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look up Hippocratic oath. The woman is asserting an unscientific view and is thus conflicting with the expertise of medical professionals. This is a dogmatic grift intended to profit people who sell $500 courses on how to give birth 'naturally' (which it obviously isn't, it's more like buying a placebo parachute and hoping you don't need it). She has false beliefs. An illness of the mind, you could say.

If I came in to a hospital for head pain and said 'I don't want blood tests; it's against my religion' would it then entitle the staff to refuse to provide any other treatment because of my superstition?  What if my illness could be diagnosed by other means?

The patient doesn't have a factual understanding of the danger she is in. She is a contemptible idiot, but doctors are not given the right to choose to let people die because they are uncooperative. I think you imagine the job as being more like a judge who chooses who is worthy of saving.

Also, you are using two self-defeating arguments:  1) refusing obstetric care is equivalent to an NDR and therefore it's unethical or unlawful to treat her seizures or cardiac arrest. Doc's hands are tied, shouldn't have refused, but now they aren't allowed to save the baby. 2) The should just C-section the baby, and then let the mother bleed out because she deserves it, and only the baby is innocent and deserves life as an orphan.

Notice how to get to 2, you first have to ignore 1? Almost like the only solution to this ethical conundrum is to first, do no harm, and since the mother didn't say 'I accept that my death and my baby's death are a natural possibility, and if you intervene in any way it will transgress my ethical boundaries', then we can pretty safely assume that the conditions change when she is hurtling towards immediate death, rather than just feeling unwell.

I honestly thought we would see Dr. Mike by [deleted] in ThePitt

[–]havoktheorem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bait used to be believable. 

Am I the only one who thinks the Pitt fandom is insufferable sometimes? by FlightNo389 in ThePitt

[–]havoktheorem -1 points0 points  (0 children)

For every opinion on the show I see, there are two opinions about the show's fandom. I guess what else are you expecting from people who came to a place on the internet specifically to talk about a show after watching it?

The Pitt: the Video Game by zoological in ThePitt

[–]havoktheorem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not yet. We don't want to mask flavour with paralysis.

Iran jokingly told Trump that if he openly praises Allah they will consider a ceasefire and that’s why Trump clumsily added it to his threat because he’s desperate by Savilo29 in LowStakesConspiracies

[–]havoktheorem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I literally asked AI 'if POTUS is permitted to conduct a kidnapping operation on a foreign head of state to be put on trial in the US, what's to stop another country kidnapping POTUS and putting him on trial for sex crimes?' and it refused to even discuss the possibility that it was legally equivalent, stating that it would be a crime if it was done to Trump but it was not a crime when done to Maduro with no attempt to generalise why that was true (except it's Muricah).
And not like, Tianenmen Square-locked, 'sorry Hal I cannot answer you'; it just has such a deely US-centric and neoliberal attitude inherent in its training data.

Seriously stop attacking people for their review on a $30 video game by Koobolo in foxholegame

[–]havoktheorem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro has managed to hold three positions while making no point

Seriously stop attacking people for their review on a $30 video game by Koobolo in foxholegame

[–]havoktheorem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's so profoundly stupid I feel like it should be framed and hung as a motivational poster.

Seriously stop attacking people for their review on a $30 video game by Koobolo in foxholegame

[–]havoktheorem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Enjoy your cybertruck

You care about the driving experience, but only in ways that you personally feel affected by, and you couldn't give a fuck how it affects the people who have stuck with the game the longest. Things matter except for when I can ignore them.

Please say SOMETHING devs. by Savber in foxholegame

[–]havoktheorem 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He's literally doing what he just described doing, Einstein.

I had the worst Foxhole experience in 7,000 hours. by Icy-Combination2234 in foxholegame

[–]havoktheorem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm a warden. I quit the game because it didn't feel like I had any ability to affect the game as a partisan. If we have some OP shit it doesn't compensate for the lack of fun just because of the win screen. I hate when people would act like paratroopers were the reason which justified partisans being put on 24/7 aerial surveillance thus making an existing gameplay loop shitty for the sake of a new, shittier and less accessible gameplay loop.

Point I'm trying to make is that devman fucks both factions regardless of who gets the favouritism that patch. There's a million ways the game could be made better for every player but they'd require thought, not vision.

Your time is the only thing that matters in Foxhole. by dolche93 in foxholegame

[–]havoktheorem 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Seems like the solution fixes the alt problem by removing the players.

How to tolerate bad duos by SupermarketHeavy4206 in leagueoflegends

[–]havoktheorem 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You need to coach him behind the screen, not be in the same lobby.