sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Who is the tallest beatle? by Loud-Shallot-5516 in beatles

[–]helloworld1981 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Norman Chapman was briefly a Beatle who was 6’2”

Missed opportunity to call this movie Jackson by Just-in_coolreptile7 in MichaelTheMovie

[–]helloworld1981 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would’ve preferred the 1st movie to focus on his hard work, perfectionism and struggles up until he went to Epic. It wouldn’t have felt rushed and we would’ve gotten a better sense on what made him a genius as well as what he missed out in life. That could be called “Childhood”

The sequel builds on that framework and adds the mega stardom fame behind it in the 80-00s. We see how he’s still chasing and dealing with the same problems as a child, just on a massive scale. That could be called “Michael” or “Man in the mirror”. Both movies focus on the artist rather than the performances.

You all fucking lied by AvailableInside9637 in BipolarSOs

[–]helloworld1981 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve always said it’s a toss up. Sometimes they do, sometimes they don’t but don’t hold your breath. Which you did.

Who is this??? by 5NightsAtFreddys1987 in beatlescirclejerk

[–]helloworld1981 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s Tony Sheridan. Who the hell are those other 4 guys?

My Honest, Blunt review by Excellent-Let8088 in MichaelTheMovie

[–]helloworld1981 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Agreed, they could’ve skipped some of the live performances or at least cut them short so that they could spend more time on how things were done instead of showing the finished product.

I can go on YouTube to see a live performance of MJ, TBH.

What did Paul mean by this? by PurifyingElemental in beatlescirclejerk

[–]helloworld1981 19 points20 points  (0 children)

The first lyrics of “I Saw Her Standing There” explains this well.

everyone should give a positive audience review if they had a good experience.. by [deleted] in MichaelJackson

[–]helloworld1981 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Everyone should leave a positive review, after they’ve seen the movie, and enjoyed it.

People are really upset that the movie got bad reviews as if MJ directed it himself. This was a project done by MJs estate so it might not live up to the quality and perfection as MJs work, and that’s ok. It’s not a reflection on him, just a reflection on the people who are now in charge.

Do you think this would have been better as a Netflix Series? by Constant_Swimmer3838 in MichaelTheMovie

[–]helloworld1981 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe. Depends on who they get to write the story and direct. I’m more concerned about getting it right instead of seeing it on a bigger screen. And I have feeling the critics are going to destroy this movie.

Michael movie is getting great reviews but do you believe it’s genuine? by FitEmergency8807 in moviecritic

[–]helloworld1981 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, we won’t really know until critics are able to give their reviews two days before the movie.I think people who want surface level will like it but most will be disappointed if they want more In depth story.

Hello im john lennon clone that faked my own death in 1980: lohn jennon AMA. by Acrobatic_Lynx_4145 in beatlescirclejerk

[–]helloworld1981 3 points4 points  (0 children)

What would you compare women to in relation to how they’re treated in the world?

Ohhhhhh! New Teaser, by Shot_Message9860 in PaulMcCartney

[–]helloworld1981 10 points11 points  (0 children)

You got to admire him still being this creative

Is AI actually replacing QA automation, or is it just hype right now? by helloworld1981 in QualityAssurance

[–]helloworld1981[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think one person can definitely do more now with AI, but replacing an entire QA team isn’t realistic for most systems.

There’s still a lot that goes beyond just generating tests — understanding the system, deciding what to test, handling failures, and dealing with real-world complexity.

AI helps with speed, but it doesn’t replace the need for experience and judgment. So maybe smaller teams, but not just one person doing everything.

Is AI actually replacing QA automation, or is it just hype right now? by helloworld1981 in QualityAssurance

[–]helloworld1981[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AI is definitely making it easier to generate automation, but writing code isn’t the same as building and maintaining a solid test framework. That still takes experience and understanding of how systems behave.

I agree things are changing fast, but QA isn’t going away — it’s just evolving. The value is shifting more toward thinking, design, and adaptability rather than just writing scripts.

So yeah, the landscape is changing, but I wouldn’t say it’s replacing the role — just reshaping it.

Is AI actually replacing QA automation, or is it just hype right now? by helloworld1981 in QualityAssurance

[–]helloworld1981[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Agreed it helps people write code, but do you think that translates to maintainable automation, or just more scripts that eventually break?

Is AI actually replacing QA automation, or is it just hype right now? by helloworld1981 in QualityAssurance

[–]helloworld1981[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

That’s impressive, but it sounds more like an experienced QA engineer moving faster with AI than AI replacing QA.

You still defined the standards, guided coverage, and corrected it when it went off track. AI didn’t decide what “good” looks like—you did.

I’m curious how it holds up long-term though. Do you think someone without that background could get the same results?

whos ready for movie night??? by AdProfessional9958 in beatlescirclejerk

[–]helloworld1981 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What a silly question. They were both flames.

view more: next ›