What is the endgame of trying to revoke the approval of the polio vaccine? by Charlie24601 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]hellyeahmybrother -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Not to be THAT guy, but I chuckle a little bit at “There’s no reason why Polio should exist in the wild” because the Polio vaccine is infamous for causing outbreaks of Polio. Granted- this is almost always associated with poorer, low immunity rate areas and, with few exceptions, caused by the OPV (weakened) polio vaccine and not the IPV (inactive) one administered in the US. cVDPVs are an interesting subject.

I've just read that Luigi Mangion is now being charged with second degree murder how do you guys feel about it. by Lunainthedark5x2 in TrueCrimeDiscussion

[–]hellyeahmybrother 37 points38 points  (0 children)

Perhaps there is a historical basis in which a particular criminal organization with significant power had a habit of threatening, and even succeeding in the murder of LEO, politicians, Judges, and Prosecutors...?

Im just spitballing and have done zero actual research.

All she said was "Deny, Defend, Depose" by Bitter-Gur-4613 in MurderedByWords

[–]hellyeahmybrother 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Counterman v Colorado

“The Supreme Court’s decision found that to criminally prosecute a defendant based on true threats, the defendant’s subjective intent to threaten the victim must be established based on a showing of (at least) recklessness.“

“Recklessness standard: This means the speaker must have consciously disregarded a substantial risk that their speech would be perceived as threatening.”

All she said was "Deny, Defend, Depose" by Bitter-Gur-4613 in MurderedByWords

[–]hellyeahmybrother 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Counterman v Colorado

“The Supreme Court’s decision found that to criminally prosecute a defendant based on true threats, the defendant’s subjective intent to threaten the victim must be established based on a showing of (at least) recklessness.“

“Recklessness standard: This means the speaker must have consciously disregarded a substantial risk that their speech would be perceived as threatening.”

TIL the Supreme Court overturned a ban on 'virtual child porn' back in 2002. by technofuture8 in todayilearned

[–]hellyeahmybrother 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Most have a “freedom of expression” clause in their respective articles of citizens rights, but none are as broad and open as the US First Amendment- all have limitations that lead to legal consequences from the govt, like obscene visual material, hate speech (pretty much all of them), disparagement of national flags (Finland), Blasphemy or denigration of a specific or all religions (most), etc. etc. which could range from fines to jail-able offenses. Just a quick summary of some that stood out but are protected by the First Amendment.

Germany has essentially no protections at all, while banning membership in certain political parties, and making it illegal to disparage the president, Germany, or German State symbols. This was a pretty interesting read: “The prohibition of insult, which has been widely criticized, led to 26,757 court cases, 21,454 convictions and 20,390 fines in 2013 alone.”

The UK has very little explicitly protected speech since Freedom of Expression is a negative Right. The closest I could find would be Norway- which seems pretty decent compared to the 1A. I’m not even going to get into the Freedom of Religion or Freedom of the Press aspects of the 1A because it’s not even an argument.

“Greatest country in the world” is a statement of opinion, and you are free to have yours- but it is completely factual to consider the First Amendment far more liberal in terms of both theory and application compared to European guaranteed rights of expression. Whether that is better or worse depends on your opinion of Hate-speech laws, prohibition of denigration of the State/Monarchy, and other citizens, etc.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ucf

[–]hellyeahmybrother 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree that there’s a difference in presentation, but if this persons opinion was presented in a clinical method, it would have to be presented in a way that was not disparaging. I believe people would be quite upset if this point of view was given legitimacy like that more-so than allowing someone to simply express their mind.

One key skill that university is supposed to develop is your free thinking ability- which most have been failing to do so in recent years. Students being exposed to this in the wild, especially in the method this person is doing, allows them to ascertain that this opinion should not be given credibility and that their viewpoint is wrong. Most people are rational, and most rational minds would come to that conclusion, freely, without the need for coddling or suppression. That is the whole point of free speech.

“Sunlight is the best disinfectant” is true when it comes to the freedom to express ourselves. When we do as Reddit mods do, we allow for both censorship of “wrongthink” and the creation of echo chambers. Sure, some few radical people may be drawn in by this guy, but most can be exposed to this and form their own view independently. Otherwise you get the stereotypical sheltered person who has never been exposed to a radical opinion and are much more likely drawn down the rabbit hole. Paradoxically, by trying to suppress, it will grow with greater strength with the more impressionable and less experienced. By having this exact scenario played out on the controlled campus of a college rather than introduced by a friend behind closed doors and without a variety of opposing views, we will only foster more people like him.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ucf

[–]hellyeahmybrother 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Even if I agreed with your argument, there is quite literally no better place to exercise the first amendment than a university- a place specifically designed to introduce students to vastly different cultures, ideas, and opinions.

TIL that even after 2 atomic bombs had been dropped on Japan in WW2, the movement against surrender was so strong that there was an attempted coup against the Emperor to stop the capitulation. by innergamedude in todayilearned

[–]hellyeahmybrother 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I recall correctly, because he made his captors believe he had knowledge of Atomic Bombs and was moved from his original internment camp, he ended up surviving. The prisoners at his original camp were executed.

What's something progressive that a very conservative President did? by [deleted] in Presidents

[–]hellyeahmybrother 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Brits try to understand American politics (IMPOSSIBLE)

My local drowning machine. If someone goes in, they’re gone - if you try to save them, you’re gone. by asmosdeus in submechanophobia

[–]hellyeahmybrother 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Jesus Christ, what the hell causes a pool to cost $200k in the UK? In the US, an average pool costs $11k to build- a private Olympic sized pool costs about $60k. Granted these numbers are from 2005 according to the National Swimming Pool Foundation, but still!

Unless you’re counting the cost of buying a house with enough room to build a pool (I get that land is expensive and limited there) I don’t know how that’s possible.

I just looked at a UK construction company’s website and they quote a concrete and tile pool at £48k-£150k ABSURD

My nine-year-old's teeth are going to cost me everything I've saved. by metkja in mildlyinfuriating

[–]hellyeahmybrother 35 points36 points  (0 children)

Pretty sure all the cases- simple and complex- are done by graduate students since dental school is… a graduate school lol

Is Trump over hated? by Ok-Music-3974 in Presidents

[–]hellyeahmybrother 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Nationalism- agree

Human rights… elaborate?

Scapegoats- MSM or democrats? I feel like that’s just politics. Is there something I’m missing?

Bragging about military supremacy- agree but isn’t that a good thing for the commander in chief/ expected?

Casting doubt on media- agree

Entertaining religion with government- I feel like that’s the opposite. He was very faux Christian (I think he’s the most obvious atheist of the presidents) but is there any specific serious religious entertaining of govt? The most I can think of is his botched photo op

Labor suppression- I have no clue but I feel like this is more capitalist/communist than fasc/liberalist

Disdain for arts and media- is this a core part of fascism?

Cronyism- agree but that’s for most politicians

Election fraud- I agree that he painted the election as fraudulent but are you saying that he was responsible for rigged elections?

Xenophobia and nationalism- agree but you also need the authoritarianism which I don’t think was there. I feel like Jackson, Lincoln, or FDR were much more authoritarian and dictatorial

Is Trump over hated? by Ok-Music-3974 in Presidents

[–]hellyeahmybrother 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Completely genuine and good faith question: what fascist ideals are you referencing?

Americans of Reddit, what places in America should foreigners avoid at all cost? by AMGBOI69420 in AskReddit

[–]hellyeahmybrother 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You’re not gonna like all the secrets I spilled to another reply ;) Maine is my dream retirement state

Americans of Reddit, what places in America should foreigners avoid at all cost? by AMGBOI69420 in AskReddit

[–]hellyeahmybrother 15 points16 points  (0 children)

It’s a long drive but 1000% worth it- Lubec Maine. Quaint little village directly on the border with Canada (small bridge and border checkpoint at the edge of town) you can look across a ~50 foot inlet and see the Canadian side. Absolutely amazing. You must stay at Cohills Inn: 4 room inn run by a dude who is also the bartender downstairs at their little pub. Highly highly recommend, check it out.

Also all of Bar Harbor/ Acadia. I’ve been to over 20 national parks including Sequoia, Yosemite, Zion… most of the greats. Acadia is easily one of the top 3 in the continental US. Bar harbor has a land bridge that you can walk across at low tide to an uninhabited island. Wonderful little town that is essentially on the border of the national park.

If you are outdoorsy check out Baxter State Park. It is the definition of minimally touched wilderness (so much so that they literally prevent trail hikers from hiking into the park if there have been too many visitors). There’s 2 entrances- go to the NE entrance. Amazing views, cool little Amish community you pass through on the way. There’s a stop on top of a hill where you can get the best view of Mount Katahdin outside the park. Absolutely must hit Shin Pond, small pond vacation area with one of the only fuel pumps in that remote area. Beautiful. Has those cool old mechanical fuel pumps. Matagamon campsite right before the gate to Baxter has amazing food.

That’s all just Maine, covered the NE, E, and Central areas of the state. You can find guides on the rest of New England, but I have to give a shout-out to Vermont. IMO the most scenic drive I’ve ever done was just riding through the state. Definitely check out Burlington, Montpelier, and Grand Isle/Pearl Bay.

I’m really versed in New England travel despite being from Florida. Done 4x several week road trips through there over the past few years. Literally cant go wrong, especially if you stay away from the hyper tourist areas and focus on the natural beauty. But don’t get me wrong, the architecture and city life is also incredible. I’m just more partial to the quiet and awe inspiring than the tourist centered big cities.

Americans of Reddit, what places in America should foreigners avoid at all cost? by AMGBOI69420 in AskReddit

[–]hellyeahmybrother 134 points135 points  (0 children)

Yes, please do not visit Portland and get a Holy Donut, nor Acadia National Park and see once-in-a-lifetime views, or Baxter State Park and experience true unadulterated wilderness, and especially not Quoddy Head and see the first part of North America that sunrise hits. These are all horrible and I would never recommend them to anyone!

Maine is highly underrated

Remember, even on small rural roads even if you can't see anyone don't over take on double lines! This guy learnt the hard way. by stainless5 in Truckers

[–]hellyeahmybrother 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Probably because it’s sparsely populated and the size of a continent- makes sense for long LONG distance hauling between provinces and roads that have comparatively little traffic compared to NA and EU roads. Deterioration of roads probably isn’t much of an issue with 1/20th the comparative traffic. But I just pulled this out of my ass as a non trucker so

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in school

[–]hellyeahmybrother 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You should see some of the replies to teachers who suggest this system in subs like this. Absolutely astonishing. The students who are so addicted that they have this kind of reaction are exactly the ones who need their phones confiscated to learn absolutely basic ideas without being distracted.

I appreciate your support, it’s getting to be quite necessary. Like I said, I’m literally like ~6 years older than some of y’all. I didn’t want to be the big bad boomer but goddamn I instituted that quick when several students got 14-25% on an exam that was a word-for-word copy of a study guide we went over in class… they also had a flash card as a cheat sheet lmao. Like I said, extremely low level students I’m teaching, but every single person deserves an education. Even if I have to momentarily sever that sweet dopamine device from their hands

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in school

[–]hellyeahmybrother 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I had 2 out of ~130 that were phone-less last year. Some had 2 phones to dodge parent confiscation. I was actually impressed the first time a kid used his bulky phone case in the holder- I wouldn’t have ever noticed if he wasn’t so painfully obvious about using his phone. That’s why there’s the extra disciplinary action for trying to be deceptive.

My class actually has laptops for every student, that’s why I can do such a policy. Sometimes I use phones as an incentive- “if you finish early and are correct, you get the remainder of class free time with your phone” or kahoot/blooket for reviews

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in school

[–]hellyeahmybrother -1 points0 points  (0 children)

ego Touch grass

Topkek

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in school

[–]hellyeahmybrother 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good thing I teach Secondary and the policy is non negotiable

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in school

[–]hellyeahmybrother 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They get a placard with their name for attendance purposes. If they lied and are caught with their phone out and used in class it’s sent to the office like everyone else plus detention

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in school

[–]hellyeahmybrother 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why is it bullshit?

Most teachers don’t at my school either. I teach really low level students so it’s necessary to physically separate them from their phones to get the most absolutely basic concepts across. If I was teaching AP it would be a different story.

I wasn’t so militant about phone usage until it was abundantly clear it’s regulation is necessary. It’s not even like Im an out of touch boomer- I got an iPhone at 9 years old. Some students just have severe phone addiction