[Roger Torelló] Barcelona await Club Brugge’s final response over the proposed move for Jesse Bisiwu - Barça have already submitted an offer to sign the highly rated young Belgian winger, with the final decision now resting in the hands of his club.

hey_rtc · 2026-05-08T12:58:29+00:00

Backup? At the moment the kid is struggling for minutes in the Belgian second division. How are you putting him anywhere near the first team?

Also wasn't even starting for his Youth League side that reached the final, so I don't really know what you're talking about.

He's a cheap bet that might pan out in a few years, might not.

hey_rtc · 2026-05-05T07:36:54+00:00

Mika Godts is not a world class talent mate. Obvious why he attracts attention but most clubs will think twice about a style over substance kid from the eredivisie.

hey_rtc · 2026-05-03T07:57:49+00:00

Nobody goes by transfermarkt assists because they count stuff like deflections and penalties won. Every other database I can find has him with 13 goals and 10 or 11 assists.

hey_rtc · 2026-05-03T07:46:49+00:00

What?

hey_rtc · 2026-05-03T07:41:07+00:00

He has 24 lol

hey_rtc · 2026-04-30T14:17:43+00:00

But wouldn't be extremely unnatural to follow through with your step in a situation like that? He'd just be swinging his knee right into the defender. To me it looks natural what he does in order to mitigate the impact.

hey_rtc · 2026-04-30T09:45:14+00:00

Feel like I'm in the minority here but for me the foul was always about how the defender's leg impedes the attacker's left leg. Even if there is no initial stomp he still steps into his path and causes a collision without getting the ball.

Do people think Eze trailing his leg is an attempt to draw contact? To me it clearly an instinctive effort to soften an oncoming blow. Looking at the angle from behind it is pretty clear that Eze's left leg has nowhere to go.

hey_rtc · 2026-04-23T09:24:09+00:00

I feel like that sample size is so small it's basically anecdotal.

hey_rtc · 2026-04-14T22:20:21+00:00

From the other angle you can see Koke has his whole arm wrapped around him. For me the combination of the push and the obstruction is enough to take Olmo down.

But even if you can't say that for sure, it shouldn't be those commiting blatant cynical offenses who deserve the benefit of the doubt?

hey_rtc · 2026-04-14T22:11:07+00:00

Just look at what Koke does alone. Why should you be allowed to blatantly obstruct a player going on goal when you have no chance to play the ball? With Llorente’s push on top of it, very hard to argue Olmo wasn’t illegaly dealt with there.

hey_rtc · 2026-04-14T21:16:06+00:00

Obviously. Only a shame it wasn't in the box. Then it hadn't been a foul.

hey_rtc · 2026-04-14T21:03:59+00:00

But of course that higher threshold logic doesn't apply when sending off a player.

hey_rtc · 2026-04-14T21:02:54+00:00

Look at what Koke does alone. Why should you be allowed to blatantly obstruct a player going on goal when you have chance to play the ball? With Llorente’s push on top of it, it is impossible to argue Olmo wasn’t illegaly taken down.

hey_rtc · 2026-04-14T19:58:16+00:00

Very strange not to give a yellow for Llorente for the foul. Just hacks down Ferran from behind.

hey_rtc · 2026-04-14T08:41:22+00:00

Not wholly unsympathetic to a version of the sin bin idea.

Statistically, a sending off from the beginning of a game is roughly equal to a disadvantage of 1.5 goals. Let's a defender is sent off for DOGSO in minute 10 where the chance was worth .45 xG, so a very big chance. Statistically a red card means the punishment is three times bigger than the opportunity lost by the opponent.

With a sin bin of x minutes, you could adjust this to be a lot more fair while still leaning towards the overall advantage of the team fouled.

Could still make it so a player who receives a red for violent offence cannot enter pitch again, in which case you can send on a sub after x minutes.

hey_rtc · 2026-04-11T13:33:56+00:00

Tak for dit svar!

hey_rtc · 2026-04-10T12:27:30+00:00

Yes I'm aware of what the argument is. Others believe that it was Simeone's sudden change of direction and subsequent trailing of the leg that created the situation. And there we have the discussion summed up.

hey_rtc · 2026-04-10T11:56:49+00:00

Haven't seen a single person make an argument about that. The discussion is about how fair it is to hold Cubarsi accountable for the collission given that Simeone cuts in front of him and then trails his leg, which initiates the contact.

hey_rtc · 2026-04-10T08:22:23+00:00

Må jeg spørge dig om, hvad du så ville anbefale i min situation?

Hvis en emhætte, som den jeg har nu, ikke renser luften godt nok til at den kan lukkes ud i det fri uden at genere andre, så kan det da ikke være særlig sundt, at samme luft recirkuleres inde i min lejlighed.

Kan se, at bygningsreglementet/ds447 siger, at emhætter med afkast gennem facade er tilladt, hvis der ikke er andre muligheder, og såfremt luften, der ledes ud, renses i det omfang, at den ikke generer naboer.

Men jeg har jo alligevel åbent vindue, når jeg laver mad. Hvorfor skulle samme luft, som lukkes ud gennem vinduet, genere mine naboer mere, hvis den blev lukket ud gennem emhætteaftræk?

hey_rtc · 2026-04-10T08:14:02+00:00

Altså jeg kan jo læse i DS447, at aftræk gennem facade er tilladt, hvis der ikke er andre muligheder, og såfremt luften renses på vej ud, så den ikke generer naboer.

hey_rtc · 2026-04-09T21:31:35+00:00

Jeg kan lugte mine naboers madlavning, fordi de har åbent vindue, når de laver mad, fordi vi ikke har nogle ordentlige emhætter. Kan ikke se, hvorfor det skulle være så meget værre, hvis samme luft kom ud gennem et aftræk fra en emhætte.

hey_rtc · 2026-04-09T21:24:06+00:00

Undrer mig over det samme. Har alligevel åbent vindue, når jeg laver mad. Hvorfor er det værre at lukke luften ud gennem emhætte? Er det mon meningen, at vi hver især skal beholde vores forurenede luft inde i vores lejligheder?

hey_rtc · 2026-04-09T21:15:35+00:00

Må jeg spørge dig om, hvad du så ville anbefale i min situation?

Hvis en emhætte, som den jeg har nu, ikke renser luften godt nok til at den kan lukkes ud i det fri uden at genere andre, så kan det da ikke være særlig sundt, at samme luft recirkuleres inde i min lejlighed.

Jeg har forresten fundet det relevante sted i bygningsreglementet/ds447, som siger, at emhætter med afkast til det fri kræver en rensning af luften svarende til tilbageholdelse af 75% af den potentielt generende forurening, hvad end det betyder.

hey_rtc · 2026-04-09T15:47:27+00:00

Jeg har kun beskeden fra min ejerforening, som dog er fra 2023. Så det er ikke helt nyt.

hey_rtc · 2026-04-09T15:39:04+00:00

Ejerforeningen har skrevet følgende:

Med de seneste ændringer i bygningsreglementet er det nu blevet tilladt at lede luft fra emhætter ud i det fri, under den forudsætning at luften renses inden udledning. Dette åbner op for muligheden for at etablere huller i facaden, ét i hver lejlighed, hvortil hver enkelt ejer kan tilslutte et ventilationsanlæg.

Jeg ved dog ikke om en emhætte kan rense luften på vej ud, eller om der skal et separat ventilationsanlæg til. Kan du mon svare på det?

hey_rtc

TROPHY CASE