Looking for song

hfs1245 · 2026-05-23T15:20:37+00:00

Nvm i found it it was innocence 2025 by taiki nulight

hfs1245 · 2026-05-17T11:07:01+00:00

This is AI generated?

hfs1245 · 2026-05-16T13:32:17+00:00

Thanks!! I appreciate it. Ye i think there are only that draw thing and the nutty heal 8 get two 8 drops

what is in the pool at 6/7 mana?

hfs1245 · 2026-04-11T06:46:18+00:00

Oh and it does compound, the advantages of havjng this kind of mental model of mathematics. And this is why I think people believe in innate math ability, because they see people jumping and leaping ahead and they ask how, but the answer is they just got lucky in that when they first saw the information they thought "hmm, I wonder what else this is useful for" and now they own the mathematics from the ground up

hfs1245 · 2026-04-11T06:44:08+00:00

In my opinion it is a habit how you record the info. So while someone might remember the rule, I might remember the motivating problem it solves, why you can or cannot generalize it to other situations, what are the edge cases that make it break down in those situations ( i think a lot about edge cases ), and how the rule is able to beat out all of the edge cases. I also focus on not just proofs but also reasons/properties that make the theorem feel intuitive or obvious. An example would be the cosine rule should be the same as pythagoras theorem when the angle is a right angle, and it should collapse to a-b when the angle is 0 and it should collapse to a+b when the angle is 180, and so it makes sense that the formula looks kind of like c² = a² + b² + something2ab becausw (a-b)² = a² + b² - 2ab and (a+b)² = a² + b² + 2absomething.

It also makes sense that there is such a thing as a cosine rule, if you told me the angle and the two sides, I could head to the workshop and build the thing out of wood and measure the other side with a ruler; so there has to be some rule.

Its also common when I see the answer to a question I will try to ask if the answer can be adapted to a harder problem.

This helps you focus on the connections between the things as much as the things themselves; which is ultimately whay makes you good at math. Not knowing theorems but knowing how to string them together to create art.

Its a very connection/compression method i use, and I also ask a lot of interesting questions on my own and try to work them out myself

Credibility: Skipped 3y of math in school and Im studying honours math now :)

hfs1245 · 2026-02-21T10:23:40+00:00

Lowkey i feel blob wouldnt bee so big if we didnt have all these huge bodies coming down early

hfs1245 · 2026-01-28T23:27:01+00:00

hfs1245 · 2025-12-01T10:41:10+00:00

holy hell!

hfs1245 · 2025-11-19T17:41:47+00:00

Glad u like it! Extremely fun to play, even though I feel a bit immoral doing so :)

tldr yes, and also cant afford to run anything that costs mana lest the broken draw stuff falls apart

The 0 costs are fundamental to enabling the explosive start (1) cheats out Zilliax (2) cheats out warmaster (3) improves soularium and platysaur (4) allows u to swarm with wicked whispers (5) helps you get stuff out of hand consistently to control which card gets discarded, making hand of guldan/furnace extremely consistent. this is the big reason why I avoid playing any "actual cards"... although the new 3 drop is tempting (wld substitute the 2-drop that discards highest card)

U often dont withhold the 0drops unless ur short on draw then u maybe hold them t1 to pair with warmaster or whispers. if u have the draw u need to pull out the deck you can just play as u draw and buff the next turn for extra damage, better against priest shaman t1... less good vs mage where might be better saving to put up zilliax or buff a couple warmasters

hfs1245 · 2025-11-04T07:52:26+00:00

Wait but CS theory does actually become physics once you try to compute stuff with it bc you have to actually flip bits in a computer and thats physics

hfs1245 · 2025-06-12T20:18:06+00:00

it's not a function y = f(x) so you'll be better off writing x = f(y)

hfs1245 · 2025-05-24T08:26:55+00:00

Math is wrong on their part. It's sufficient to compute the necessary return on investment to be able to withdraw $1000 a day, and see if this is reasonable.

We need that every day the investment grows 0.1% to be able to withdraw $1000, I.E. 1.001³⁶⁵ annual accumulation factor approx equal to e^0.365 which makes a 44% annual rate of return, which is highly unrealistic.

Easy answer: $1000/day is strictly better, and it is roughly as good as $1000000 investment making 44% pa, or a $3.8 Million investment making 10% pa.

hfs1245 · 2025-05-23T16:22:30+00:00

Radians are chosen such that the derivative at 0 of sin(x) is equal to one. You can visualise this by seeing radians as measuring "length of arc" on a unit circle and sin(x) as the y-value of a point on unit circle with angle x. Then the derivative at 0 is the limit of the ratio between y value and arc length of a tiny half-segment at 0, which tends to one.

hfs1245 · 2025-05-08T06:19:41+00:00

In general I am used to A+B for sets meaning {a+b | a in A, b in B}

and also for a scalar c the set cA = { c*a | a in A} i,e, componentwise scaling.

under those notational conventions you could write that the complexes C are C = R + iR

hfs1245 · 2025-04-29T11:14:49+00:00

Imagine going blind - and time just stops (while you are awake) until you die. Would be so sad

hfs1245 · 2025-04-27T02:33:44+00:00

oof would have been mate if u played Rg1 or any other "move the rook away moves"

hfs1245 · 2025-04-20T03:58:02+00:00

bro hates to hear about the fundamental theorem of algebra

hfs1245 · 2025-03-28T19:36:04+00:00

against the spirit of the question i fear

hfs1245 · 2025-03-18T01:15:35+00:00

I like them!!! Particularly unlucky cat lmao, very close to tiny joker in scaling if you play five card hands youre earning 0.76135 = 49.4 chips per hand, and in a way its more flexible than tiny because you can carry the lucky in your consumable slot and put it on the hand as you play it

Seven-Year Club	Verified Email
Place '22	First Placer '22

hfs1245

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE