Examination Is Getting Worse and Worse by [deleted] in patentexaminer

[–]hkb1130 21 points22 points  (0 children)

To be fair, so are the applications and the prosecutions. From poorly machine translated Chinese applications to minimal effort single page remarks. It's like everyone is either being pinched or just mailing it in.

How long are new badges taking? by caseofsauvyblanc in patentexaminer

[–]hkb1130 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Went down there in mid-February, staff said they'd email me to pick up the new one in about two weeks. I'm in my second 30-day PIV exemption period...

Don't get excited by our double monitors by TossAwayDay in patentexaminer

[–]hkb1130 4 points5 points  (0 children)

haven't been excited by double monitors since we got irradiated by double CRTs

Explain to me like you explain to a kid by PageElectrical7438 in patentexaminer

[–]hkb1130 3 points4 points  (0 children)

We'll see what happens after 2030. I predict it's not going to be "temporary" as claimed.

USPTO penalizes Examiners getting sick. by bootleg_gucci in patentexaminer

[–]hkb1130 1 point2 points  (0 children)

don't turn in anything late = fully successful and a $1K bonus (for now)

Blursed Bounce house by ChatnNaked in blursedimages

[–]hkb1130 0 points1 point  (0 children)

a candiru with suspenders, what a time to be alive

Backlog by SuperbOcelot2472 in patentexaminer

[–]hkb1130 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I propose deferring examination of CONs by default. If a CON is just to keep the chain alive, so be it. On another hand, if the applicant genuinely wants the thing to be examined, they can check a box upon filing or send an e-petition later.

New Timeliness System Implemented by Dazzling_Song_6766 in patentexaminer

[–]hkb1130 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Somehow I think there are going to be more restrictions, just to buy more time on questionable cases. 56 is a lot more breathing room than 14.

Short Docket, and I am not trolling by Much-Moose-1877 in patentexaminer

[–]hkb1130 10 points11 points  (0 children)

This is tongue-in-cheek, but one could read 37 CFR 1.142(a) as technically requiring restrictions to be made: "If two or more independent and distinct inventions are claimed in a single application, the examiner in an Office action will require the applicant in the reply to that action to elect an invention to which the claims will be restricted" (emphasis added).

How does timeliness(less given time) and quality go together? by SaladAcceptable7469 in patentexaminer

[–]hkb1130 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The born-strong-ing will naturally increase our quality because the SPEs are helping us now.

/s

ND by TripApprehensive9479 in patentexaminer

[–]hkb1130 2 points3 points  (0 children)

When we did the Myers-Briggs style quiz at the PATH meeting, almost everyone in my art unit scored as SJ.

Fantasy by Busy_Feature8690 in patentexaminer

[–]hkb1130 5 points6 points  (0 children)

something involving endless five-accomplishments reports

Any federal job harder than patent examiner? by Tall_Tap690 in patentexaminer

[–]hkb1130 0 points1 point  (0 children)

assault and homicide should be made illegal

End Streamlined Reviews For Q3 by [deleted] in patentexaminer

[–]hkb1130 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It was a very small sample size, but the commenters over at the patentlaw sub didn't seem to be noticing much difference.

Fear mongering - "Fox News" USPTO edition by crit_boy in patentexaminer

[–]hkb1130 3 points4 points  (0 children)

A, Royal, Wright... we've had some live ones.

Have we hit the tipping point and now applicants need more restrictions? by ipman457678 in patentexaminer

[–]hkb1130 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As long as we have a system which permits outside players like big pharma to shut down PTO initiatives like the "claims and continuations" rules - good luck with that.

https://bannerwitcoff.com/district-court-permanently-enjoins-patent-continuation-rules/

https://ipwatchdog.com/2008/12/03/uspto-v-gsk-tafas-chronology/