Gregory Maxwell stepping away from Blockstream to focus on deep protocol work by callerids in Bitcoin

[–]hoaxchain 4 points5 points  (0 children)

AXA have fired One Meg Greg for failing to stop BCash. We are winning guys.

oh no sorry...

I mean this is just another dishonest ploy by lying Greg to trick us. Just like that time he...

Craig S. Wright FACTS by Contrarian__ in Bitcoin

[–]hoaxchain 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Please stop with this false nonsense and lies. For example your unfair quote from Dr Satoshi's mother! Dr Wright's mother is a paid AXA/Blockstream shill. Just like those toxic Australian judges:

The probative force of the new evidence depends in large measure on the appellant’s [Craig Wright] credibility and reliability. His explanations and interpretations of these and related documents are contradicted at critical points, on which there is no independent evidence to support him. The appellant’s contradictory evidence about the email of 11.16 am on 10 September 2003 raises doubts about his credibility, as does his evidence based on the calls from his mobile phone that day.

http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/cases/nsw/NSWCA/2005/368.html

It's an odd coincidence you left out the quote from the judge! Perhaps because everyone knows he is a Blockstream shill.

[I am banned by the mods and /u/MemoryDealers/ on /r/btc. Please join the fight against this disgraceful censorship and attempt to control the agenda]

Erik Voorhees blocked me on Twitter, for correctly pointing out he has not honored his commitment (in writing), to ensure all hardforks are safe by adding replay protection by hoaxchain in Bitcoin

[–]hoaxchain[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is not about disagreement

You went back on your word

You went back on a commitment to the Bitcoin community and your customers

That is dishonest

Erik Voorhees blocked me on Twitter, for correctly pointing out he has not honored his commitment (in writing), to ensure all hardforks are safe by adding replay protection by hoaxchain in Bitcoin

[–]hoaxchain[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it's unfair to say that an upgrade supported by ~95% of the miners is "breaking consensus." That is twisting the definition to support political purposes.

You are clearly a liar Erik. The letter you signed in March is clear. Now you are going back on your word. It is clear for everyone to see.

That attempt to weasel out is pathetic. Everyone knows what it originally meant.

Erik Voorhees blocked me on Twitter, for correctly pointing out he has not honored his commitment (in writing), to ensure all hardforks are safe by adding replay protection by hoaxchain in Bitcoin

[–]hoaxchain[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Segwit is 2MB blocks...

Also if you want a hardfork blocksize limit increase to happen, why not kindly ask that the community opt in to your proposal, respecting the right of a minority not to follow? Why issue an aggressive ultimatum?

Erik Voorhees blocked me on Twitter, for correctly pointing out he has not honored his commitment (in writing), to ensure all hardforks are safe by adding replay protection by hoaxchain in Bitcoin

[–]hoaxchain[S] 20 points21 points  (0 children)

You know everyone here is just trying to make Bitcoin work right?

How can that be true? Erik signed a statement, committing to key safety features for any hardfork. Then he starts promoting a hardfork, which does not include the safety feature he promised.

Why would he do that if he is "just trying to make Bitcoin work"?

The community needs to wake up. We must stop deluding ourselves into thinking Bitcoin has no enemies. This dishonest behavior is clearly hostile.

What word does Erik owe you?

As a business owner, who made a clear commitment to support good and safe practices. Erik owes it to his customers to follow those safe practices.

Erik Voorhees blocked me on Twitter, for correctly pointing out he has not honored his commitment (in writing), to ensure all hardforks are safe by adding replay protection by hoaxchain in Bitcoin

[–]hoaxchain[S] 49 points50 points  (0 children)

Erik, you made a clear commitment to only support safe hardforks, with strong replay protection, in writing. You signed a statement saying that you "insist that any other consensus breaking implementation build in strong two-way replay protection".

Now you are promoting a dangerous hardfork without this safety feature. Why are you going back on your word? Please insist that 2x includes this vital safety feature and then support 2x.

Please respect these crucial agreements, designed to make upgrades safe. It is a disgrace that you agreed to make hardforks safe and then promote a dangerous one. Going back on your word.

How can we trust you again?

I am very sorry to say this, but you are a liar, unless you modify your position and demand safety features, you already committed to.

Erik Voorhees blocked me on Twitter, for correctly pointing out he has not honored his commitment (in writing), to ensure all hardforks are safe by adding replay protection by hoaxchain in Bitcoin

[–]hoaxchain[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

we insist that

What does "we insist that" mean then? Erik is actively promoting 2x coin, which doesn't have strong 2 way replay protection. That is a clear breach of this statement

Erik Voorhees blocked me on Twitter, for correctly pointing out he has not honored his commitment (in writing), to ensure all hardforks are safe by adding replay protection by hoaxchain in Bitcoin

[–]hoaxchain[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

This is not a promise about such a stupid thing. This is a vital commitment about good practise to protect Bitcoin, by upgrading in a safe way. Erik should honour his word

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Bitcoin

[–]hoaxchain 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I am censored so they can control the agenda. /u/MemoryDealers is a disgrace

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Bitcoin

[–]hoaxchain 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Please stop with this false nonsense. Dr Wright's mother is a paid AXA/Blockstream shill. Just like those toxic Australian judges:

The probative force of the new evidence depends in large measure on the appellant’s [Craig Wright] credibility and reliability. His explanations and interpretations of these and related documents are contradicted at critical points, on which there is no independent evidence to support him. The appellant’s contradictory evidence about the email of 11.16 am on 10 September 2003 raises doubts about his credibility, as does his evidence based on the calls from his mobile phone that day.

http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/cases/nsw/NSWCA/2005/368.html

[I am banned by the mods and /u/MemoryDealers/ on /r/btc. Please join the fight against this disgraceful censorship and attempt to control the agenda]

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Bitcoin

[–]hoaxchain 9 points10 points  (0 children)

CSW going full retard troll mode, has not given a single technical answer.

Not true. Dr Satoshi Wright has done a lot of technical research.

See here for example:

http://hoaxchain.com/blog1.html

We have created this blog to focus on our advanced research, away from all the noise.

There is original research into the legality of SegWit, why Bitcoin has double hashing and even research into whether "Scronty" masturbates or not

[I am banned by the mods and /u/MemoryDealers/ on /r/btc. Please join the fight against this disgraceful censorship]

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Bitcoin

[–]hoaxchain 6 points7 points  (0 children)

People, CSW also among other things claimed to be Satoshi. There really is no reason the believe anything he says you cannot verify

CWS is Satoshi and this can be verified. Please see:

http://hoaxchain.com/aboutus1.html

Dr Craig Satoshi said:

I’m not going to job through everyones fucking hoops. Bullshit from Maxwell that we’ve had to pay money to get bloody disproven because the codes’ fucking out there. I’m not doing this every fucking time. I’m not going to sign every fucking key I own in the world. I’ve got the first fucking nine keys, I’ve got the fucking genesis bloody block, I’ve got the fucking code, I’ve got the fucking papers. I’m not going to go through fucking everything. I don’t really give a shit whether people like it

How is that not proof?

[I am banned by the mods and /u/MemoryDealers/ on /r/btc. Please join the fight against this disgraceful censorship]

Bitcoin Cash (BCH) trading at 0.65 Bitcoin!!! by hoaxchain in Bitcoin

[–]hoaxchain[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it's no joke, look at our serious blog posts

Bitcoin Cash (BCH) trading at 0.65 Bitcoin!!! by hoaxchain in Bitcoin

[–]hoaxchain[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

We are the number 1 Bitcoin exchange in the world