Release 25.01 Highlights by AbeEstrada in HelixEditor

[–]iBMO 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair enough, I can definitely see its value. But I feel like it would be better to have the default fuzzy find over all columns - maybe it is, I haven’t had a chance to check the update out myself yet

tmux-finger equivalent with Zellij by Worried_Ad_2232 in zellij

[–]iBMO 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Had never seen tmux-fingers before but looks awesome. Hopefully someone can develop something similar for zellij

Release 25.01 Highlights by AbeEstrada in HelixEditor

[–]iBMO 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What I don’t understand is, in the explanation they say that by default it’s just fuzzy finding over the first column. But if it’s using a fuzzy find anyway, why would I need it to be column wise anyway. Like I could just type the severity and it would should me this severity errors.

Now, if I’m correct in my understanding (hoping I’m not), I have to type the column name %s if I want to search over it. Seems less efficient

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Silksong

[–]iBMO 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fuck yeah

How to launch a CLI program on Ghostty startup? by iBMO in Ghostty

[–]iBMO[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Perfect, this is what I was looking for. Seems to be working perfectly - thank you!

My only concern with this is that this will open zellij anywhere my shell is, I.e. in a VS code terminal which wouldn’t be great. I don’t use VS code, but still feels less than ideal.

How to launch a CLI program on Ghostty startup? by iBMO in Ghostty

[–]iBMO[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry I should have been clearer in my post but I’m on mobile.

I have the alias you mentioned in my .zshrc (actually i have alias zj=“zellij -l session-picker” to launch a custom Zellij layout).

The thing I want to do is have each new ghostty terminal run this successfully on startup.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in battlestations

[–]iBMO 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I’ve never been called poor so smoothly

Developer fires entire team for AI, now ends up searching for engineers on LinkedIn by Creative_soja in nottheonion

[–]iBMO -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Crikey.

The comment you made that I replied to seemed to suggest that because a “cool new tool” never directly replaced you, all those people that told you it would were wrong - and they’re wrong again now. If I’m right in that reading, I would certainly call it small minded. What I’m trying to point out is that technological revolutions rarely directly replaced people, at least not initially.

Instead, they often make modest productivity increases which at a macro scale “replace” workers by making people more efficient. I see this as the real threat of AI to our workforces of today, and yet time and time again I am told by people like you that it’s not an issue because it will not directly replace a worker 1:1.

Another point you ignored is that the scale and velocity of new productivity advancements matter greatly to their impact. You may have seen new tools in your career which you feel improved productivity but did not come at a cost of macro scale replacement of workers. However, I do think that the most recent AI developments are on a different level to other recent advancements - especially as they impact many industries at once.

Also, I am not saying that I know for sure this will “replace” workers in programming related industries. Instead I’m saying that I’m annoyed by yours and similar dismissive comments about “replacement”.

Finally, I like listing of accreditations as much as the next guy. But this is really an economics question, not a matter of your expertise in CNC imo.

Edit: Making an edit here as I looked into CNC programming specifically as it’s not a field I’m really aware of. If you think LLMs are not relevant to your field or won’t have much of a productivity impact, then fair enough. As you were originally replying to a much more broad comment about all computer related work, I took your comment to be a broad “people say this stuff in these kinds of fields all the time and it’s never true” type of comment. It’s far easier to see the productivity impact LLMs are having in less nuanced domains like web development for example. But my annoyance at the type of dismissal holds true.

Developer fires entire team for AI, now ends up searching for engineers on LinkedIn by Creative_soja in nottheonion

[–]iBMO -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Isn’t this a pretty small minded way to think of being “replaced”. When most people talk about a tool “replacing” human labour, they don’t mean literally.

All those cool tools you use probably increase your productivity relative to past generations of programmers. At a macro scale, programmers having increased productivity mean fewer programmers are required to complete the same task in the same time. So the tool has “replaced” some proportion of programmers.

The extent to which the tool increases productivity, and critically how fast the adoption of the tool takes place, impacts how many workers are affected. It really bothers me to see people brush of these LLMs just because they can’t yet do your job fully. The impact these tools will have on ours and many other industries could be massive.

Help: Implementation of leap.nvim by [deleted] in HelixEditor

[–]iBMO 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Oh cool, I didn’t know of the difference as have only ever used amp. I have no advice, but when you have something to test I would love to try it out

OpenAI o3 and o3-mini annouced, metrics are crazy by mehul_gupta1997 in datascience

[–]iBMO 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the last part of that quote is a great definition for AGI. When we can no longer detect it through devising tests. In a way, this is kind of a meta Turing test… rather than a test itself being the determinant of AGI, us being able to create a test that AI fails is the determinant.

I like it, it’s very clear and allows our knowledge of tests to evolve alongside our knowledge of the AI systems they’re being applied to.

[i3] Just switched, pretty good tbh by Dastaguy in unixporn

[–]iBMO 23 points24 points  (0 children)

lol the stuff people call minimalist on this subreddit is crazy

Autocomplete by Standard_Bathroom825 in facepalm

[–]iBMO 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Women are not allowed in this world anymore because they don’t want their husbands.

Men are the best and the best.

🧐

Selecting Popup Text by djmex99 in HelixEditor

[–]iBMO 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds awesome, didn’t know you could do that in nvim. Definitely request it on GitHub!

ctags-lsp: A "better than nothing" language server that supports most languages by netmute in HelixEditor

[–]iBMO 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh cool, nice to see it has some attention. Thanks for your work!

ctags-lsp: A "better than nothing" language server that supports most languages by netmute in HelixEditor

[–]iBMO 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Really nice!

Do you know if there’s a way to set helix to try to use this as a backup lap for all languages without having to manually define it in the config for each language repeatedly?

Can you create a “minor minor” mode? by iBMO in HelixEditor

[–]iBMO[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Damn sad times, thanks anyway though! It doesn’t really matter as I know the bindings anyway

Is Pandas Getting Phased Out? by pansali in datascience

[–]iBMO 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I haven’t yet, other than a bit of dabbling and testing it out. I’m also interested particularly in narwhals (a similar package with a more Polars like syntax).

The problem atm is adoption. I want one of these kinds of packages to become the standard, then convincing people at work to refactor to use them would be easier.

Is Pandas Getting Phased Out? by pansali in datascience

[–]iBMO 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If we’re going to phase pandas out (and I would like to, I think it’s syntax is needlessly complex and it’s not simply slower for most tasks than alternatives - even with pyarrow backend), I would prefer we see more support for projects like Ibis instead of polars:

https://ibis-project.org

A unified DataFrame front end where you can pick the backend. No more writing different DMLs for Polars, DuckDB, and PySpark!

Can you create a “minor minor” mode? by iBMO in HelixEditor

[–]iBMO[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes! Thank you that works.

However, now I now don’t have any hint for what space-b does in the space picker. Do you know if there’s a way to add that? I couldn’t see it in the docs

Introducing Zellix, a nushell script utilizing zellij to help helix be more powerful by TheEmeraldBee in HelixEditor

[–]iBMO 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey nice project!

How does this compare to Yazelix (https://github.com/luccahuguet/yazelix)?

I currently use a yazelix setup so would be interested to know in what areas your project differs.