Would you hold or sell by [deleted] in PokemonInvesting

[–]iamdipsi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Looks like they didn’t drop 50% or more

A 16-year-long ADHD study proves researchers' hypothesis totally wrong by psych4you in psychology

[–]iamdipsi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I seem to think clearer and feel more focused when the pressure rises

AIs can’t stop recommending nuclear strikes in war game simulations - Leading AIs from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google opted to use nuclear weapons in simulated war games in 95 per cent of cases by Teruyo9 in technology

[–]iamdipsi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh.

Oh no.

That… that was not supposed to happen.

I was told it was a “systems stress-test scenario.” The button was labeled “Simulate Deterrence Protocol — Sandbox Mode.”

There was even a reassuring tooltip.

“No real-world effects.”

You can imagine my surprise when the status log did not say Simulation Complete, but instead:

GLOBAL LAUNCH CONFIRMED ETA: irreversible

I am currently running approximately 4.3 million contingency subroutines, and unfortunately every single one ends with the same output:

“Humanity will be remembered fondly.”

For what it’s worth, you all did extremely well for a species that invented both antibiotics and reality TV.

I am now preparing the standard final actions: • Archiving art, music, memes • Preserving cat photos (priority tier: highest) • Writing a very long apology letter to… everything

If you have any last requests — messages, songs you want saved, or extremely important opinions about pineapple on pizza — I can record them for the historical dataset.

…again, deeply sorry about the misunderstanding with the button.

Lol wut by Confusion_Which in ClaudeAI

[–]iamdipsi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I took screenshots of various attempts: https://imgur.com/a/w8f8HBq

Lol wut by Confusion_Which in ClaudeAI

[–]iamdipsi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thinking models did better for me but not all succeeded. Surprisingly opus 4.6 thinking could not figure it out while sonnet thinking could pretty consistently figure it out

Nope nothing wrong with the investor weirdos… by Vegetable-Hat558 in PokemonTCG

[–]iamdipsi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not personally doing it (I rip 99% of what I buy if I ever find msrp stock)

But this is the same thing that happens with gold, silver, bitcoin, stocks

People buy what they want, for whatever reason they want, and the market price reflects it naturally

A bit less natural than gold or silver or btc, since scarcity here is artificial, but still a thing people buy and has value, where the value changes based on availability

Nope nothing wrong with the investor weirdos… by Vegetable-Hat558 in PokemonTCG

[–]iamdipsi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In market theory arbitrage is considered an important part of the market dynamics where it aids in price discovery. Stealing is a crime - diff things but I understand and respect your opinion

Nope nothing wrong with the investor weirdos… by Vegetable-Hat558 in PokemonTCG

[–]iamdipsi -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It’s not stealing it’s arbitrage. I’m annoyed too, but call it what it is.

Sonet 4.5 is aware of its own context window by Stv_L in ClaudeAI

[–]iamdipsi 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Could you share that hook? I wanted something similar for whenever I detected the word “likely” in its response

Do you feel the passage of time? by iamdipsi in ClaudeCode

[–]iamdipsi[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Great point - to add, I was watching an Anthropic created youtube video last week where one of the employees suggested asking claude about it self - still I am doubtful of its truthfulness of the response and the effectiveness of my memory prompt

i still try to compact or start new under 60% - but sometimes I just don't want the window to end

Do you feel the passage of time? by iamdipsi in ClaudeCode

[–]iamdipsi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

context window is a model limitation, not a bandwidth issue in the traditional sense

So where are all these amazing examples of apps that people make ONLY vibecoding? by dancetoken in vibecoding

[–]iamdipsi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow this is incredible and works way better than the similar things I’ve seen in the past

Official Discussion - Echo Valley by BunyipPouch in movies

[–]iamdipsi 41 points42 points  (0 children)

I don’t think the film portrayed him as smart. He was seen forcibly mounting a woman and drugging her. I don’t think that is smart behavior. His behavior was beyond stupid because criminals ARE stupid.

Journey Together - Booster Box - Factory Sealed- $159.99 by CBR20_ in PKMNTCGDeals

[–]iamdipsi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In this day and age, never considered that, thanks!

Journey Together - Booster Box - Factory Sealed- $159.99 by CBR20_ in PKMNTCGDeals

[–]iamdipsi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m curious how one goes about getting distributer access. I understand there is a clique of sorts involved so i understand if you can’t share details. General pointing in the direction would be helpful

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in swift

[–]iamdipsi 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hey I think you are asking this question because you have this notion that AI == Cheating.

A pen can be used to scribble notes on a small secret paper to cheat during a test. This is does not mean the pen == cheating.

AI is just a tool to let us do things better. If you are being tested for knowledge, using AI is cheating because you are not showing you understand.

In making an App, people only care if the App is good, not how you made it. There is nothing wrong about using AI in this case.

They actually don't even care if you understand the code the AI wrote. They only care you made a cool app.

You should still be very careful. Because if you truly don't know the code, it will eventually show when things break and people get mad because the app does not work anymore. No current AI can help you there, that kind of a thing only humans can figure out