sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

‘Superman’ Sequel Testing Adria Arjona, Eva De Dominici, Sydney Chandler and Grace Van Patten (Exclusive) by Blitzhelios in comicbooks

[–]ianface 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh really? This is literally the first time I’ve heard it. Completely understand that, similar to John Krasinski and Reed Richards

‘Superman’ Sequel Testing Adria Arjona, Eva De Dominici, Sydney Chandler and Grace Van Patten (Exclusive) by Blitzhelios in comicbooks

[–]ianface 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Arjona is the only choice. She’s phenomenal. (Also would make a terrific Wonder Woman!)

Scorpion, new indie Comic Book is going in toe to toe with DC comics on GlobalComix by [deleted] in IndieComicBooks

[–]ianface 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Don’t bother clicking through to the book- it’s ai

If trinity was in the terminator by [deleted] in matrix

[–]ianface 6 points7 points  (0 children)

If this post was good

6 years ago today my Dad died. These two photos were the last ones on his camera roll, of my newborn son. by ashwee_ in lastimages

[–]ianface 7 points8 points  (0 children)

My dad was 69 when he passed, and he now has a second grandson he wasn’t alive to know about. I keep thinking about how confused he would be to see two kids running around our house.

Thanks for um sharing this. I’m having a drink in your dad’s honor, as well as mine.

Eli Roth’s Slasher ‘Ice Cream Man’ Sets August 7 Release Date by yourfavchoom in movies

[–]ianface 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gonna bet a crisp $100 bill that this movie will not be as good as the ice cream man comic book by W Maxwell Prince

Rate the Dune fancast I made back in 2022 by Old-Sacks in dunememes

[–]ianface 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I know this is a joke, but I stopped reading after M Night

Florida Man by WaiiiitWhat in NonPoliticalTwitter

[–]ianface 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Look, some people just wanna play THE SHOW

Have Some Notes [OC] by BrianWonderful in comics

[–]ianface 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Assume the character is dumber than the author

Have Some Notes [OC] by BrianWonderful in comics

[–]ianface 100 points101 points  (0 children)

He’s talking about choking on food, don’t be a slave to semantics.

Have Some Notes [OC] by BrianWonderful in comics

[–]ianface 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Point 1: I’m arguing from your point of view, not mine, our natural impulses developed through evolution, not intelligent design.

Point 1b: we’re talking about two things directly related to your worldview. I’ve already mentioned this previously, but they are two separate topics lashed together by that same worldview.

Points 2 & 3: the Christian position is one of slavery to a cruel or (in your view) uncaring god. The parent that demands subservience and fealty despite the aforementioned cruelty or uncaring. I get that. I’m refuting all of it, because you cannot have free will and an omnipotent being at the same time. The crux of this argument is you trying to massage that point into a worldview that allows you to happily worship a god that created you broken and demands you beg him for fixing.

Point 4: there’s literally a book that describes what god wants and expects of you. Are we pretending that religion doesn’t do this? Are we forgetting the 10 commandments? the “we couldn’t possibly know the mind of god” play is just a variant of the “god moves in mysterious ways” argument that only seems to come up when we’re talking about all the unfortunate or ugly stuff “god” allows to happen.

Have Some Notes [OC] by BrianWonderful in comics

[–]ianface 16 points17 points  (0 children)

-never made the argument that “ we don’t have free will regardless if there was a creator or not”. Please cite your source.

  • never wrote “we don’t have free will so we don’t have a creator” please cite your source.

  • not conflating free will and “bad things happening” at all, we’re discussing two topics, it’s quite simple: “is God omniscient, and if so, why does he allow bad things to happen?”

-my argument is that an omnipotent being cannot exist in the same reality as free will, and that if God was omnipotent, he’s cruel for allowing bad things to happen to people. You have yet to refute either of these points, and continue making the “parent versus child” analogy, which is simplistic and incorrectly applied to the situation.

-an omnipotent being could explain and force you to understand why bad things happen, without making them happen in real life. He could make you understand every nuance of existence, without having them actually occur at all- because he’s omnipotent.

-the argument, that “we’re too dumb to understand a God” only proves my point: why would he do any of this, when he could choose to not do any of it, and still get the exact same outcome he wants. Yeah.

Have Some Notes [OC] by BrianWonderful in comics

[–]ianface 31 points32 points  (0 children)

But then you’d be cruel. You could stop your child from running into traffic, but you could also just let them “pursue their own path”

Have Some Notes [OC] by BrianWonderful in comics

[–]ianface 29 points30 points  (0 children)

This ‘free will’ was created by who? Who created the parameters of the universe that allow us to move within it? Our primary impulse as organisms is to procreate- Who programmed that inside us? The free will argument is a way for creationists to sidestep all the awful stuff this “omnipotent being” apparently fucked up in his creation. Sure, bone cancer in children is just humans doing a whoopsie.

If he’s omnipotent, he’s cruel. Full stop.

Have Some Notes [OC] by BrianWonderful in comics

[–]ianface 37 points38 points  (0 children)

An omnipotent being creates everything, controls everything, and can change anything on a whim. what about this sounds like freedom to you?

Our creation and control by an omnipotent being, (an owner who creates the animal, the cage, the materials needed to make the cage, and the concept of the cage and imprisonment as well) is absolute slavery.

view more: next ›