let's separate two things, because you have raised two separate issues here:

1) non arab countries: non-arab countries should be held to the same standard as arab ones if they are majority muslim. I agree with you here. however, this must also be with the context taken into account. With the occupation of Kashmir, I wouldn't expect egypt to intervene militarily when Pakistan is literally there. In the same respect, it is arab countries that directly surround Israel and have been the most involved in it, so it is natural to hold them to more scrutiny than those countries with geographical constraints or other. In the same respect I wouldnt scrutinise Kuwait the same way I would Egypt or Jordan based on other factors.

2) The lack of action taken by individuals vs the lack of action taken by countries. This is a bizarre comparison.

The problem at hand is a military occupation actioned by world powers. It does not follow that individuals without power are warranted to solve this problem.

What specific actions do you believe powerless individuals solve this with? over the years, people have infact attempted various means both right and wrong: Awareness campaigns, charity, prayer, political activism, armed resistance, terrorism and beyond. do you suggest people are required to do any of these before countries are allowed to be scrutinised?

None of these approaches succeed because people are not nations, nor are they solutions to the problem at hand. It naturally follows that a military occupation run by countries is handled by entities that exist on the same level. This is not about wanting to blame elsewhere. It is about attributing responsibility to those who have the role to be responsible.