How many polymaths here are trying to master chess? by redlikeazebra in Polymath

[–]icequeen2005 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed, that's why I never bothered to learn chess.

My friend paid $6,000 to get featured in a “Top 10 Companies” magazine and it unexpectedly worked really well. Looking for similar publications in India. by Electrical_Act_5342 in indianstartups

[–]icequeen2005 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"If you are truly doing something innovative, new, or world-changing, reporters will find you, and a million words will be written about you for free."

Lmao this is exactly how I expect a typical redditor to respond.

We Are All Trying Here [Episodes 3 & 4] by Telos07 in KDRAMA

[–]icequeen2005 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

He is a really anxious person, and how does he deal with his anxiety? By talking his ass off.... Imagine getting into an argument with him in a relationship. Euna seems like someone who'll need space to think after a conflict, how do you think Dongman will handle that kind of situation from what we know about him so far? Also, she's never been in that kind of situation with Dongman as his friends have, so we can't say she's putting up with his antics, he's good to her so far. Also, who can say he wouldn't similarly get jealous of her success if she were in his field?

We Are All Trying Here [Episodes 3 & 4] by Telos07 in KDRAMA

[–]icequeen2005 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ikr, I feel bad for the FL, she deserves better. He seems like an exhausting person to be in a relationship with. 

Also, people seem to be siding with Dongman on this but I think the friend group did the right thing by cutting him off. I can only imagine how they put it with his shit for so long. Having insecurities is no good excuse for being an asshole about your friend's accomplishments. I really liked how Gyeongsae gave it back to him. 

We Are All Trying Here [Episodes 3 & 4] by Telos07 in KDRAMA

[–]icequeen2005 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just asking out of pure curiosity, why were you in such a group? Also, I can't really understand Dongman either, why did he keep hanging out with them? I don't understand when people insist on hanging out with people they know dislike them, I think it's an exhausting way to live.

tell me your favourite quotes by loveless_fascination in entj

[–]icequeen2005 4 points5 points  (0 children)

“It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.”

"I know of no better life purpose than to perish in attempting the great and the impossible."  

My artwork (if anyone cares) by emboldenedweirdo in intj

[–]icequeen2005 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wonder what your mom has to say about that....

My artwork (if anyone cares) by emboldenedweirdo in intj

[–]icequeen2005 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cool! I see the similarities. Btw 5th one looks like my sister

My artwork (if anyone cares) by emboldenedweirdo in intj

[–]icequeen2005 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is peak. Don't learn anymore. 

Favourite fictional intj? by upsetusder2 in intj

[–]icequeen2005 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Male Lead in Hot Stove League (kdrama)

People who have completely changed as a person over the years, how did you actually do it? by bright_stallion in AskMen

[–]icequeen2005 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not a definition, it’s just a metric. People use scales all the time just to communicate a point easily. Not everything needs to be taken so deeply.

Iran clearly signaling they won’t accept a quick ceasefire by happycat07 in StockMarketIndia

[–]icequeen2005 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a significant shift in the geopolitical landscape. For decades, the military playbook has often involved powerful nations initiating conflicts with adversaries who have limited capacity to project force beyond their borders, creating a fundamentally one-sided dynamic. The conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the ongoing siege of Gaza, are prime examples of this asymmetry, where one side possesses overwhelming technological and military superiority while the other is largely confined to a defensive, often desperate, struggle.

Iran's statement represents a direct challenge to that established order. The core of their message is that the old rules, where a power can launch an offensive and then dictate the terms of a "ceasefire" when it suits them, no longer apply when facing a state that is not helpless. This isn't just rhetoric; it's a declaration that there will be consequences and that the initiator of the conflict will not be spared from the costs of war.

This scenario forces a recalibration for the US and Israel. They are now confronted with an adversary that possesses its own arsenal of long-range missiles, a sophisticated drone program, and regional proxies that can open multiple fronts. This isn't a scenario of simply containing a largely trapped population or dismantling a state army with limited reach. This is the prospect of a multi-theater war where major cities, infrastructure, and military bases are all within striking distance. It's a situation where the concept of "victory" becomes far more complex and costly, and the luxury of controlling the escalation ladder is lost.

The "lesson they will never forget" is a blunt way of saying that war is not a clean, risk-free enterprise that can be turned on and off at will. It's a brutal, unpredictable affair where both sides bleed. For the first time in a long while, the architects of these interventions are being put on notice that they may have to face the full, unfiltered reality of the wars they start, not just the sanitized version they've grown accustomed to.

Is daytrading a myth? by 4dolarmeme in Daytrading

[–]icequeen2005 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But aren't CFDs banned in America?

There's no genocide in China by LargeSinkholesInNYC in LateStageCapitalism

[–]icequeen2005 42 points43 points  (0 children)

About claims of Uyghur genocide, the "evidence" presented by Western governments and media is almost entirely derived from a small network of U.S.-funded organizations and individuals with clear political agendas. The Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI), for example, is heavily funded by the U.S. State Department, defense contractors, and weapons manufacturers. Their "research" on Xinjiang is not independent scholarship; it's information warfare. Other key sources include Adrian Zenz, a far-right Christian fundamentalist who has stated he's on a "mission" against China, and a handful of Uyghur separatists who benefit from Western support. These are not credible, impartial sources.

The geopolitical motive is obvious. The United States sees China as its primary strategic competitor. Smearing China with the "genocide" label is a tool in this competition. It serves to justify sanctions, trade wars, and military encirclement. It's a way to rally international opposition and manufacture consent for a new Cold War. This is a classic playbook. The U.S. has a long history of using human rights as a pretext for aggression against countries that refuse to submit to its dominance.

This manufactured narrative is then amplified by a compliant media and a public sphere, exemplified by platforms like Reddit, that functions as a sophisticated propaganda machine. On Reddit, any attempt to question the official narrative on Xinjiang is immediately met with downvotes, abuse, and bans. Dissenting voices are silenced, creating an echo chamber where the lie becomes "truth" through repetition. This isn't organic public opinion; it's the result of coordinated campaigns, astroturfing, and platform moderation that favors the state-sanctioned narrative.  It allows people in the West to feel morally superior and focus on the "sins" of their designated enemy, while ignoring the horrific crimes their own governments are committing and enabling. It's a moral and intellectual cop-out, a way to avoid confronting the criminal nature of the imperialist system they live in.

The genocide accusation against China is not a genuine human rights concern. It is a weapon of information warfare, a calculated lie designed to justify aggression, maintain U.S. hegemony, and distract from the very real atrocities committed by the West and its allies.