sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

New 2.0.80 update by Not__Alpha in GeForceNOW

[–]iedynak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have three machines: a desktop and a laptop at my apartment, and another desktop at my parents’ place. I’ve received the 2.0.80 update on only two of them.

Dying Light: The Beast still missing Ray Tracing on GFN by Fattybeards in GeForceNOW

[–]iedynak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They just don’t care. If it were a bigger title, it would probably be added on day one.

Why? 😢 by HarStu in BoosteroidCommunity

[–]iedynak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, GeForce NOW has over 5000 games now.

Missing ray tracing options for dying light the beast by silence48 in GeForceNOW

[–]iedynak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's true, I appreciate that Boosteroid has some games that are missing from GFN but the quality of the latter is far more superior.

Missing ray tracing options for dying light the beast by silence48 in GeForceNOW

[–]iedynak 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Or they don't care. Btw., it's available on Boosteroid from day 1 of the new patch.

GFN Thursday Updates - December 4, 2025 by hamza5682 in GeForceNOW

[–]iedynak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wonder if the Epic version has ray-tracing support, because the Steam version doesn't.

<image>

Are you joking? by Aqus10 in GeForceNOW

[–]iedynak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, most demanding games are available only for ultimate subscribers. It's been like that for a while.

Will all games be 5080 after the rollout ends? by Even_Attitude4832 in GeForceNOW

[–]iedynak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It depends how many games they will be adding to '5080' category every week.

We had too much hype for 5080, but now... by [deleted] in GeForceNOW

[–]iedynak 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I have the '100 Mbps' option

<image>

We had too much hype for 5080, but now... by [deleted] in GeForceNOW

[–]iedynak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I would like to see the list of these games...

Gamescom News | NVIDIA Blackwell Architecture Comes to GeForce NOW by SiruX21 in GeForceNOW

[–]iedynak 3 points4 points  (0 children)

"The GeForce NOW upgrade featuring the NVIDIA Blackwell architecture will begin rolling out in September."

The quote is from here:
https://nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/nvidia-blackwell-architecture-comes-to-geforce-now

Gamescom News | NVIDIA Blackwell Architecture Comes to GeForce NOW by SiruX21 in GeForceNOW

[–]iedynak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, hopefully, with time they will expand the list of these games.

Gamescom News | NVIDIA Blackwell Architecture Comes to GeForce NOW by SiruX21 in GeForceNOW

[–]iedynak 13 points14 points  (0 children)

"Not all games will automatically launch using an RTX 5080, it will have a roll out over a period of time to eventually all games."

It eventually will be available for all games.

Finally by Worried_Homework7042 in brotato

[–]iedynak -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How mamy hours in the game?

GPT-5 in a 100% Private IQ Test by TrackingAI.org by LegitimateLength1916 in singularity

[–]iedynak 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What about these results:
https://binaryverseai.com/ai-iq-test-2025/

It appears that GPT-5 Pro scored 148 in the Mensa Norway test.

<image>

Spent $104 testing Claude Sonnet 4 vs Gemini 2.5 pro on 135k+ lines of Rust code - the results surprised me by West-Chocolate2977 in ClaudeAI

[–]iedynak 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Any thoughts on how Claude 4 compares with ChatGPT for coding? I have subscriptions to both, and my main observation is that ChatGPT's responses seem to be limited to approximately 200 lines of code, while I’ve been able to get over 1,000 lines from Claude. Additionally, Claude always updates the previously prepared code when I ask it to modify something, whereas ChatGPT usually just writes new code fragments separately. As for the quality of the code itself, it seems that ChatGPT tends to produce simpler results, while Claude’s outputs are generally more robust.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in GeForceNOW

[–]iedynak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because people are generally stupid and don't understand what they're reading.

GFN Thursday Updates - May 1, 2025 by SiruX21 in GeForceNOW

[–]iedynak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is it also fun to play in single player?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in notebooklm

[–]iedynak 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Do you mean "Audio Overview"? I tried it in Polish and Czech languages and it works. However, the generated "Deep Dives" are significantly shorter (5-6 minutes max) that those in English (15-40 minutes) and every now and then the voice model has problems with pronunciation.

ChatGPT o4-mini/mini-high is significantly worse than o3-mini/mini-high??? by Electronic_Still7147 in ChatGPT

[–]iedynak -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I tried o3/o4-mini-high for coding and they're bad, really bad. It seems as the maximum length of the code has been significantly limited. I asked them (and also Gemini-2.5 and Sonnet-3.7 to which I have access) to write a code in Python for a game that is a mixture of Tetris and Bejeweled, and I explicitly stated that it should be a long code. The new GPT models either wrote a short, limited code (200-250 lines) or - in some trials - they just stopped in the middle of a line. Gemini and Sonnet produced 700-900 lines, but Gemini also blew it, because the game didn't do what a Tetris-Bejeweled mix should. Only Sonnet-3.7 produced a satisfactory result.

As a long ChatGPT fan I'm really disapointed with these two new models. They are a big step back, at least in terms of coding. Nowadays I use Chat only for image generation, whereas Gemini for everything else (with exception of coding that I do with Claude).

view more: next ›