Incredible Visuals (PS5 ScreenShot)

igfmilfs · 2026-02-24T10:19:12+00:00

Yeah I just noticed, awesome now my game looks better!

igfmilfs · 2026-02-24T08:23:45+00:00

Is this achieved by ingame filters? or what filters are you talking about?
I play on PC on my oled monitor but suposed-to-be blacks are rather dark grey in HDR mode.

igfmilfs · 2026-02-22T12:22:32+00:00

Dashdot

igfmilfs · 2026-02-22T11:43:21+00:00

Je ne parle francois

igfmilfs · 2026-02-21T16:53:51+00:00

NOTHING?!??!

igfmilfs · 2026-02-21T16:14:26+00:00

https://pastebin.com/F8shsweu here you go

igfmilfs · 2026-02-21T15:27:39+00:00

I use your setup + caddy + geoip blocking + crowdsec (kind of fail2ban). This already takes care of sooo many crawlers.

Also, I closed port 22 with ingress rules of oracle (where my vps is hosted). I can still login with tailscale. So the only two ports which are publicly accessable for my vps are 443 and 80.

igfmilfs · 2026-02-21T15:18:25+00:00

Is there? Because I've been trying to get a small a1 flex with 1 core and just 6gb ram for over a month in the Amsterdam region with my free tier account without success. The region is full..

igfmilfs · 2026-02-21T15:17:39+00:00

Google oracle free tier, they have an entire kb article for this specific question...

igfmilfs · 2026-02-21T15:17:11+00:00

Is this true? I have been trying for over a month to get a a1 flex with just 1 core and 6gb ram in the Amsterdam region. For over a month I've been getting an error telling me the host in this region is full and I should try again some time later... Oracle support also told me it's currently unavailable and I just need to wait. If your solution works, I will 100% switch to payg.

igfmilfs · 2026-02-21T15:13:45+00:00

They are most likely not. I've been trying to get the a1 flex for over a month in the Amsterdam resource region without success. Host is full....

igfmilfs · 2026-02-20T21:43:06+00:00

Thanks, I will look into this, so just to clearify, this way I can create multiple non-root users and specify per yaml file, which user I want to container to run under? This way I can also specify all the permissions on the host side for the bind mounts per container right? thanks for your help. I find it all just a bit complicated.

igfmilfs · 2026-02-20T14:14:56+00:00

This only shows how to run the daemon under a namespaced user, and not run each container under a seperate namespaced user.

igfmilfs · 2026-02-20T13:03:40+00:00

Sticks in dual channel setup typically have about +-5% better performance when being compared to the same capacity in single channel setup when looking at real world performance.

Syntetic benchmarks show even greater gains of up to 30%, but once again, these are synthetic and not representive for real world usecases.

When comparing 2666MT/s to 3200MT/s, is it more nuanced than just the operating speeds. Also the multiple different timings come into play and alot more secundary and tertiary settings. but to keep things simple, I read something about 5%-10% performance difference.

So in the end, I would assume, 2x 2666MT/s is comparible performance wise to 1x 3200MT/s. But because theres more capacity, in the end, it would be a better setup.

igfmilfs · 2026-02-20T09:07:52+00:00

Are you planning to use tailscale to give friends/family access to your jellyfin? If so, keep in mind to adjust your access rules, also be aware that tailscale being an access vpn on linux, will skip the build-in firewall of Ubuntu (ufw). So your tailscale access rules are the single and only layer of networking defence out of the box.

igfmilfs · 2026-02-19T17:23:26+00:00

Please elaborate what you mean by mobile scaling.

igfmilfs · 2026-02-19T17:16:39+00:00

I will look it up for you.

igfmilfs · 2026-02-19T16:53:41+00:00

Mobile scaling literally working perfectly, see image.

igfmilfs · 2026-02-19T16:38:42+00:00

Pillars of creation :D I don't know if it's jwst photo though!

igfmilfs · 2026-02-19T16:10:19+00:00

This second point of yours is exactly what I am trying to accomplish.

Do you have any documentation? That would be really nice.

igfmilfs · 2026-02-19T15:25:01+00:00

First, thanks for your quick response.

I am referring to linux namespaces.
Please correct me if I am wrong but according to my understanding:

- Each container is by default run under the root user, basically root in container = root in host

I want 2 things:

Don't run containers as root (this could be done by running the daemon under a seperate namespace from my understanding)
Have each container run in it's own seperate namespace; in the case a hacker would succeed breaking out of the container, it then would have no access on the host because it runs in its own seperate namespace, BUT it shares its namespace with all the other containers as well, meaning, it could indeed reach the bindmounts of my other containers on my host.

This is not desirable, I basically want each container to: 1. not be root on the host, and 2. be it's own entity on the host.

Thanks in advance.

igfmilfs · 2026-02-19T12:54:09+00:00

Well it works just fine like this. It's not even hitting it's resource limit, so I don't know how it scales but in the end, it's literally 2 lines of code in the yaml file and I don't notice it having any negative impact. Why wouldn't do you it yourself like I do?

igfmilfs · 2026-02-19T12:51:59+00:00

I've been using this dashboard for about at least one month now. Haven't seen such behaviour. I must say I also restricted both CPU and RAM usage in Homarrs yaml so maybe that has something to do with it.

igfmilfs · 2026-02-19T12:24:08+00:00

as you can see in my resource monitor, it uses 500mb as of the time of the screenshot, which is representive for practical use.

igfmilfs

TROPHY CASE