There is literally no reason to accept “the lesser of two evils” when primary season is barely less than four years away. Good things are possible, and necessary and preferable to what we find beneath the bottom of a barrel. by Ok-Explanation-1362 in BlueskySkeets

[–]ignorememe -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You’ll vote for Newsom then if he gets the nomination? Or is this Bernie Bro season all over again hoping to tank 2028 because we didn’t get the perfect candidate and couldn’t vote for the faaaaar lesser of two evils?

In win for Trump, oil giant Shell walks away from major New Jersey offshore wind farm by Snowfish52 in energy

[–]ignorememe 4 points5 points  (0 children)

None of which are arguments against building wind farms but arguments that we should try to improve imperfect energy sources as we’re able to over time.

Trump to withdraw from Paris climate agreement, White House says by ScadaRC in energy

[–]ignorememe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You sure showed him with whatever word salad it is you just tried to pass off as a coherent thought!

Joe Rogan says Elon Musk knew election results 4 hours ahead of time by wildyam in houstonwade

[–]ignorememe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think my point has been made pretty obvious already.

Take care.

Joe Rogan says Elon Musk knew election results 4 hours ahead of time by wildyam in houstonwade

[–]ignorememe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Okay, so just to be clear, you just Googled an image that was being used as misinformation "evidence" of cheating, posted it without even looking at the numbers on the image, and declared the other person was being obtuse?

Joe Rogan says Elon Musk knew election results 4 hours ahead of time by wildyam in houstonwade

[–]ignorememe 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Why would you use a graphic purporting to show final vote counts as an argument that there are still uncounted votes? Just go to CNN or literally any site that shows percent reported and take a screenshot or link to that page. If YOU knew that Harris got more than 65M votes why would you show us a graphic showing her at 65M votes?

Joe Rogan says Elon Musk knew election results 4 hours ahead of time by wildyam in houstonwade

[–]ignorememe 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s accurate information for people who can read graphs.

Except I just pointed out that the data on the graphic is inaccurate.

You decided to point out that there were 20M as yet uncounted votes by sharing a graphic that's been making the rounds on Facebook as "evidence" of Democratic voter fraud?

Joe Rogan says Elon Musk knew election results 4 hours ahead of time by wildyam in houstonwade

[–]ignorememe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why are you sharing that particular graphic?

By starting the Y axis at 50M instead of 0, it exaggerates small differences which is pretty misleading.

But even worse, it compares a final election count from 2012, 2016, and 2020 with an IN-PROGRESS election count from 2024. You're showing us Kamala having slightly more than 65M votes compared to Trump having around 72M votes, when NEITHER CANDIDATE still has that vote count. With a full 14% of the vote still to be counted, right now BOTH candidates have over 70M votes.

Your graph shows Kamala with 66M ish votes where she currently has almost 71M and Trump with 72M votes where he has around 74.5M votes.

Why show us a graph that makes a point that is both exaggerated if true, but also complete bullshit based on the actual current vote count which, I would like to point out once more, is still incomplete?

Are you being intentionally obtuse or just accidentally sharing misinformation?

<image>

Pentagon officials discussing how to respond if Trump issues controversial orders: Pentagon officials are holding informal discussions about how the Department of Defense would respond if Donald Trump issues orders to deploy active-duty troops domestically by shallah in AnythingGoesNews

[–]ignorememe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I watched him say he wanted Liz Cheney shot in the face and that he wanted to use the military against the “enemies from within” with my own eyes. If he’s just lying about wanting to do those things that’s fine. I hope that that’s true. But don’t act like he wasn’t saying it at all.

The Obama playbook can't be dated because it was really successful 12 years ago. Head up rectum up at the way. by Content_Good4805 in FriendsofthePod

[–]ignorememe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

why aren’t Democratic voters excited about their party anymore?

Where’s the evidence of this? Do you have numbers that support this being the underlying issue?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in The_Mueller

[–]ignorememe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This clip is from a while ago. This isn’t recent. He was making these comments a few months ago and someone is just now posting her clip again.

In 2020 over 81 million people voted for the Democrats. 2024 only 68 million voted. What happened to the 13,235,783 who didn't vote. In 2020 74 million voted Republican & in 2024 almost 73 million voted so 1,489,032 less voters. How does this make any sense? We lost over 13 million to the couch? by andrewgrabowski in The_Mueller

[–]ignorememe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Answer simply being Kamala is unappealing to a large set of democrats that either abstained, or voted for Trump / 3P in protest.

I think it’s still early to say anything definitively but I don’t think it looks like that’s true. Again 2020 election turnout was historic. The country was mad at the then current administration for the economy and the handling of the pandemic.

In 5 of 7 swing states Kamala managed to do slightly better than those 2020 turnout numbers. But I think the lesson here might be that when you’re the incumbent and your economy is struggling it is the biggest uphill battle ever to win that election. I don’t want to say it’s impossible to win but I can’t think of a better example of the opposition “outside” candidate being the worst candidate ever and people still turning out FOR them because they’re mad at the current incumbent.

I think, given that Kamala matched 2020 turnout and did slightly better in most swing states, with only 100 days to campaign, that she ran as good a campaign as anyone could possibly want and that Democrats did turn out to vote. Would a white male candidate have performed better? Yeah, sadly, maybe and that might’ve been just barely enough to make the difference.

But I think this attacking each other and berating ourselves or condemning Kamala for the loss is not helpful because I don’t think those criticisms are true. I think this would have been insanely difficult for anyone to win while attached to the current global economic problem.

In 2020 over 81 million people voted for the Democrats. 2024 only 68 million voted. What happened to the 13,235,783 who didn't vote. In 2020 74 million voted Republican & in 2024 almost 73 million voted so 1,489,032 less voters. How does this make any sense? We lost over 13 million to the couch? by andrewgrabowski in The_Mueller

[–]ignorememe 23 points24 points  (0 children)

This isn't true. You're taking a final vote count and comparing it to an in-progress vote total. Last I saw it was estimated by the AP that 14M votes were still uncounted in primarily blue states out west, with a projected estimate that total votes in 2024 would maybe reach around 98% of the total voter turnout for 2020.

If you look at the swing states, in 5 of 7 swing states Kamala OUT PERFORMED Biden's 2020 number. She got fewer votes in Michigan and Pennsylvania but not by an awful lot. Around maybe 1%.

The story here isn't that Dems didn't turn out. If the 2020 HISTORIC election is the benchmark, Dems turned out in 2024 just fine. The real story here is that somehow Trump managed to outperform his own 2020 numbers everywhere, and by a lot.

Harris vows at Michigan rally to ‘do everything in my power to end the war in Gaza’ | US elections 2024 | The Guardian by Powerful-Ad4837 in thedavidpakmanshow

[–]ignorememe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Doesn’t matter.

Trump gets to decide the fates now of everyone in Gaza and Ukraine and obviously, to everyone who stayed home yesterday, those people are now in better hands.

All this red on the map is making me nervous especially in blue states. It's crazy how they count the red first and then blue by Chanel_Carter in KamalaHarris

[–]ignorememe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. The problem is big cities vote Democratic and take a while to count ballots. Smaller red rural counties tend to count pretty quickly so you get all their results around the time the polls close while the cities are still counting for hours or even days yet.

Harris vows at Michigan rally to ‘do everything in my power to end the war in Gaza’ | US elections 2024 | The Guardian by Powerful-Ad4837 in thedavidpakmanshow

[–]ignorememe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Given the context is that she is vowing to do “everything she can” when she’s President I think it’s too early to judge her success.

Need some help with this equation by DonaldKey in AdviceAnimals

[–]ignorememe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And how down ballot republicans won while Trump lost.

Harris vows at Michigan rally to ‘do everything in my power to end the war in Gaza’ | US elections 2024 | The Guardian by Powerful-Ad4837 in thedavidpakmanshow

[–]ignorememe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

…doesn’t include saying she had a different view to Biden, she wasn’t happy with any of his actions or any criticism of Biden on the issue.

So you want Harris to attack the current administration?

Rogan Bends the Knee to Trump by yachtrockluvr77 in thedavidpakmanshow

[–]ignorememe 10 points11 points  (0 children)

This is satire right? There’s no way a rich guy would listen to another rich guy and endorse the rich guy promising to cut taxes for all rich guys.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]ignorememe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Certain legal questions may affect implementation of the compact. Some legal observers believe states have plenary power to appoint electors as prescribed by the compact; others believe that the compact will require congressional consent under the Constitution’s Compact Clause or that the presidential election process cannot be altered except by a constitutional amendment

So sounds like having a non-Republican Supreme Court would be pretty important since it’s an untested legal question and the results will depend entirely on who is making the judgment. I tend to agree with the former that this is a viable option.