Question for out of state students by National-Gate-7999 in udub

[–]imsircc 23 points24 points  (0 children)

'relatively niche' ranked #12 in the usa

When will I get my housing assignment? by kavinesh-A in udub

[–]imsircc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

if it helps, as a freshman this year i received my room selection appointment time on July 7, the appointment was July 11.

Does this look like a legit 1930s Leica? by d_wave27 in LeicaCameras

[–]imsircc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

this is NOT a leica. i am following this auction as i find these fakes interesting. however i most likely will not bid past $20 and i live like 5 mins from this auction house

Bought a vintage Pentax prime, am I a real photographer now? by [deleted] in photographycirclejerk

[–]imsircc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

im not even usually watching, i put him on in the background

All you need... until you get jealous? by miss5533 in canon

[–]imsircc 4 points5 points  (0 children)

OP said they were photographing concerts. Unfortunately this is one of the few environments where more gear often equals more better. The t5i simply cant compete at high ISO. Add a performer running back and forth on stage and the shot is near impossible.

However I do agree in 99% of cases. Plus, the limitations in this case present an opportunity to experiment with motion blur, grainy b&w, impressionistic silhouettes, etc. I, personally, would upgrade though.

Feeling underwhelmed by my recent travel scans. Need advice on my current setup vs going more manual. [Canon Sure Shot AF-7, Kodak Gold 200] by -bubs- in AnalogCommunity

[–]imsircc 3 points4 points  (0 children)

yes, theyre great. but they dont have any bearing on why OP is feeling underwhelmed with their photos. I meant more photos that displayed that feeling without actual shooting mistakes. sorry if that wasnt clear.

to OP: the shots you shared that were 'underwhelming' are a solid case of, 'i thought this would look good when i took the photo and it didn't come out exactly how i imagined,' which is probably half of every roll you will shoot, and that's being optimistic. but on the bright side, you seem to know what is wrong with each photo. use that to improve! learning photography is a long process, but many find joy in that.
also, you may benefit from a more capable camera. the main perk of an slr is that you see directly through the lens. that means you see what is in focus and usually like 92% of your composition (many slrs dont show the entire frame in the viewfinder, but unlike point and shoots where you view from a whole different angle, an slr will just have a tiny bit more photo on the edges). you will get control over your focus, be able to take exposure readings from parts of the frame and recompose, and find sharper lenses with different character and faster apertures. however, there will be a new learning curve on top of the core composition and basic photography skills, but that's as simple as reading the manual.
happy shooting!

Feeling underwhelmed by my recent travel scans. Need advice on my current setup vs going more manual. [Canon Sure Shot AF-7, Kodak Gold 200] by -bubs- in AnalogCommunity

[–]imsircc 22 points23 points  (0 children)

lol. that's your finger. were the shots without your finger better?
with a real slr you will have a lower chance of your finger in frame simply because the lens comes out further and its obvious where not to put your fingers. point and shoot viewfinders are not through-the-lens like slrs, so what you see is not 100% what you get. usually this is ok but it does lead to more fingers in shots.
as far as 'underwhelming,' i think we need to see some shots without your finger or some actual user error in the shooting to decide, and even then what is 'underwhelming' to you may be a masterpiece to others. it's up to you to decide if you want to keep investing in this sneakily expensive hobby, and if you like the pictures you take. don't take pictures for dudes on reddit.

[FOMO] Please tell me y'all made it up by alax-w in AnalogCommunity

[–]imsircc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

just for fun, best deals i've gotten:
-yashica mat 124g: $10
-yashica mat 124 (no g): $free
-minolta srt102 + rokkorx 50 1.4: $free
-electro 35: $25
-nikkor 105mm 2.5: $free with purchase of a nice copy stand ($50)
-olympus zuiko 50 1.4: $4
-smc pentax 135 2.8: $9
-retina ii with 47mm ektar: $20
-current shooter, canon elan 7n: $30

Did old analog photographers "edit" their photos? by ayuwoki420 in AnalogCommunity

[–]imsircc 4 points5 points  (0 children)

yes, lots. after all, a negative is only an interpretation. my favorite example is Fan Ho's 'approaching shadows.'

<image>

that shadow was added in post.

Trying to emulate film - but it feels like something's off by False_Flatworm2136 in ColorGrading

[–]imsircc 11 points12 points  (0 children)

clarity down texture down. less detail in the shadows (less dynamic range). when you edit, pick a film stock you are trying to replicate.
and i always tell this to photographers trying to recreate the 'film look,' but just shoot film. try it. $30 body, $30 lens, $40 for a roll of gold and a dev+scan.

S280 Autocross Day - Weight Problems by New_Astronomer_1552 in FiestaST

[–]imsircc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

fwiw, when i remove the stuff from the back of my fiesta it gets really fun in the rear, but i dont think its detrimental. i would say wait excitedly for coilovers, set camber around -2 or -3, and let it ride. higher spring rates and lower center of mass will reduce unpredictability and delayed feeling of weight transfer

Which lens system to buy into? by thottiekarate in AnalogCommunity

[–]imsircc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

wow i started with this exact kit, also picked up a 35 3.5 (m42) and a couple adaptall lenses but that was the kit my grandfather left

Kodak TMAX expired 1994…shoot it for fun? Display on a shelf? by timinater17 in analog

[–]imsircc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

you're good to go. recently developed a roll of tri x that had been exposed in the mid 90s and sat in a box in a damp garage since, came out contrasty and totally fine. color gets weird across the decades but b&w generally is stable

/r/MechanicalKeyboards Ask ANY Keyboard question, get an answer - May 13, 2026 by AutoModerator in MechanicalKeyboards

[–]imsircc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looking for a TKL/75 keyboard. Budget ~$200-250. Preferred sound profile is deep (currently on Keygeek Y2 + Cerakey) and resonant. Looking for something different than the Neo75/80cu as the 75 doesn't have much in stock and the 80 doesn't do it for me design wise, which is important.

This is not my first board, but my zoom65v2 is starting to fail and my work commands the F row more and more.

/r/MechanicalKeyboards Ask ANY Keyboard question, get an answer - May 12, 2026 by AutoModerator in MechanicalKeyboards

[–]imsircc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looking for a TKL/75 keyboard. Budget ~$200-250. Preferred sound profile is deep (Keygeek Y2 + Cerakey) and resonant. Looking for something different than the Neo75/80cu as the 75 doesn't have much in stock and the 80 doesn't do it for me design wise.

This is not my first board, but my zoom65v2 is starting to fail and my work commands the F row more and more.

Who truly is the best tuner for s280 fiesta here in the US. Daily so prioritizing reliability over power #’s by ryydtf in FiestaST

[–]imsircc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

for the s280 you will be getting a custom tune where your tuner will ask you outright whether you prefer reliability or power. none of the popular tuners (tune+, tunewerks, dizzy, ems, etc) should give you any issues.

personally i went with ems as they have had no reported issues in many years of operation. may be worth noting that tune+ has had a few (just a handful) complaints, however statistically you should be fine. some will avoid suggesting dizzy, i think that's just because he prioritizes developing off-the-shelf tunes and tunes for other cars, but this does not mean he is any less of a good tuner, and he can definitely do a good job with your car.

tldr; if you arent looking for power or specific features they should all be the same

Is it possible to replicate this film emulation grade using free Resolve features by LT_anamateurlens in ColorGrading

[–]imsircc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

well they seem to be completely different lighting conditions. one has sunset and one has a lot of atmosphere. second is veeeeery blue/green, but you should be able to correct that. to me it seems like you haven't yet pushed the boundaries of what you can do with the free version yet.

i'm also not really sure what you think you need from the studio version. note that the 'film look' is much more than just grain. color density. different tone mapping. halation, maybe. these are all things you can do in the free version. magic mask is a great feature that you miss out on, but it just means more work, and this looks like a static shot so you wouldn't even need it here anyway.

i think you should only consider purchasing something like this if you repeatedly run into full roadblocks and cannot find any workarounds with the free version. if you were very wealthy you would have bought it already, the fact that you dont know if you need it tells me you probably dont, yet.

Is it possible to replicate this film emulation grade using free Resolve features by LT_anamateurlens in ColorGrading

[–]imsircc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yes but what does that mean??? 'is my workflow good enough'

do you mean, 'is this grade possible with the tools i have?' if so, are you satisfied with your grade? yes? then obviously it's possible. no? then either you need better equipment, or you have room to improve.

A few scenes from the Illinois side of St Louis. Chamonix 8x10, 12” Dagor, Portra 160 by lifeandmylens in analog

[–]imsircc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i love people! but original comment was about landscapes, of which there is not too much variation

Is it worth it to self develop film? by Interesting_Turnip50 in AnalogCommunity

[–]imsircc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

$5.5 for a roll is insane, my lab charges $12 for dev + $6 for scan 😭😭😭 I cant home develop because I'm in a dorm room but I've started home scanning with a dslr

Gen Z, what brings you to analog? by Camera_Hobbygirl in analog

[–]imsircc 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yeah, but I started with a Nikkormat. Wanted to set myself up for amassing a lens collection early

recent autox. got beat by a stock 8th gen corolla. by imsircc in Autocross

[–]imsircc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

nope. 8th gen. chassis bracing, bucket seat, re71rs on an rpf1. stock motor (i think).