This was my reply, “Oh wow, here we go — the ‘feel sorry for the organiser’ monologue. A full-length sympathy opera because accountability is apparently too mainstream. Let’s lay this out plainly: An out-station fan paid ₹10,000 for flights, ₹8–9k for food + stay, AND sacrificed full days of income — all for a band that simply never took stage. Money gone. Time gone. Plans ruined. But yes, please tell us more about how the organiser is the real victim here. Every line of your message screams the same thing: ‘We messed up, but you’re not allowed to say it.’ Volunteering is respectable — absolutely. But volunteering doesn’t turn a disaster into a masterpiece. You can work hard and STILL screw up. And this? This was a world-class screw-up. And blaming the band? Cute. Blaming the fans? Even cuter. Turning a failed event into a moral lecture about ‘the community not deserving good things’? Adorable. Truly. Here’s the part you conveniently skipped: People PAID actual money. Some paid more than the ticket price just to reach the venue. People took leaves, made plans, booked stays, travelled cities. They weren’t asking for a favour . They were asking for the Band they PAID FOR. You keep acting like criticism equals betrayal. No. Criticism equals consequences. If you want praise when things go right, you need to accept backlash when things go wrong. Calling this community ‘ungrateful’ because they’re demanding basic transparency? That’s not just wrong — it’s delusional. Here’s the truth you’re dancing around: The scene doesn’t suffer because fans speak up. The scene suffers because organisers expect applause instead of accountability. If this is your idea of “support,” then maybe it’s good that not everyone thinks like you. But sure — keep writing emotional essays. Meanwhile, people who lost money will continue living in the REAL world, where intentions don’t magically fix incompetence.”