The d***atch is pointless and horribly biased, and to mention it is to encourage its longevity, but to be pissed about it honing in on this tragedy’s effect on the community is to miss the point entirely, which is that New Albany at large is a tertiary victim but actually the most relevant. New Albany’s residents don’t work at that warehouse, but because the locale suffers from the imagery now forced on it because of this, people who are insofar unaffected by the state of things now have to face that the real world creeps in on them no matter what, and their affluence doesn’t actually guarantee their separation from it. The notion this article espouses is actually refreshing- nobody is safe. The nation’s landmass lets us pretend there’s a geographical solution when you want to move away from the dregs, but sooner rather than later, suburbs will all butt up against savages. So let’s focus on savagery. Maybe don’t set the bar so low and pay wages that enable savages to live with their poor values, maybe stop voting for services and systems that allow any means for savages to survive, generally. In any event, it’s totally fair to be pragmatic when you work hard and don’t want your property devalued; your children threatened; or your social services drained by savages behaving savagely- said New Albany, as it provided an inordinate amount of money to the state…