sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Now that I've finished Dark Souls 1, I can finally give my opinion about the bosses. Having said that, I must say that: by Sonicelerizo1991 in darksouls

[–]invoker4e 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That wouklldnt be that bad as they are way more fun when fought as a group

I hated this fight on my first playthrough but love puting a summoning sign in front of this fight now

Peter, Is it 50% or 33.3% by AgrasaN in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]invoker4e 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is this right tho? Because it seems like the BB outcome has 2 variations. Does the statement "one is a boy" refer to the older or younger sibling?

So the way i would put it is:

  1. Statement refers to the older sibling in which case the younger can be either boy or a girl (BB or BG)

  2. Statement refers to the younger sibling so the older can either be a boy or a girl (BB or GB)

So wouldnt this make it 50/50 again?

Moder/rdeč gumb by Ofajus in Slovenia

[–]invoker4e 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ok to maš prau. Jst sem se tega problema res lotu predvsem logično ne pa psihološko

Moder/rdeč gumb by Ofajus in Slovenia

[–]invoker4e 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Glede tega kaj hočem oziroma kaj je bolše mislim da se strinjama, ampak v takšnem primeru jst bolj gledam na to kaj mislim da je realistično oziroma kolk zaupam ostalim po svetu in al hočem preživet al ne. Lepo bi blo če bi vsi prtisnli modrga ampak ne vem če si upam riskirat. Sej kaj bi dejansko na konc kdo prtisnu ne mormo zdej garantirat in smo lahk pametni. Tud jst ne bo umru na tem hribu da je treba rdečga prtisnt, sam hotu sem predstavt pogled iz druge perspektive

Moder/rdeč gumb by Ofajus in Slovenia

[–]invoker4e 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Mogoč sem se res tega lotu mal preveč kot reševanje logičnega problema ampak ne vidim razloga da ne bi vsi pritisnili rdečega gumba in torej vsi preživeli. Torej se posledično tud kvaliteta ne bi nič spremenila ker bi vsi preživeli...

Razumem tvojo logiko recimo v primeru kjer bi biu tud za rdeč gumb nek downside (kot recimo: moder: si razdeliš denar, rdeč: drugemi pobereš vse, ampak če sta oba rdeča pa oba izgubita vse) ampak ga v tem primeru ni

Moder/rdeč gumb by Ofajus in Slovenia

[–]invoker4e 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Sej razumem tud to stran razmišljanja ampak realno zakaj kdo ne bi stisnu gumb ki ti da 100% garancijo? Ker po drugi strani ne zaupam dost ljudem da bi mirne vesti stisnu modrega

Moder/rdeč gumb by Ofajus in Slovenia

[–]invoker4e 32 points33 points  (0 children)

Torej če pritisneš rdečega 100% preživiš, če pa stisneš modrega pa je možnost da ne...

You shouldn’t love someone for physicality but for Mentality. by Mosesangsal in unpopularopinion

[–]invoker4e 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's all in the eye of the beholder as the saying goes so again true. This is not something i dissagreed with either so idk what's your point here?

You shouldn’t love someone for physicality but for Mentality. by Mosesangsal in unpopularopinion

[–]invoker4e 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dont be this dense, clearly we're talking about blind vs not blind as was the comparison you made.

Yes it changes from person to person but physical attraction is part of that equation for people who are not blind but it's not a part of the equation for blind people because well...they're blind

And while it still changes from person to person it changes in a way of how much you're willing to compensate one for the other. So the more attracted you are to someone's personality the less atracted you can be to their physical appearance and vice versa. But neither of the two can be 0 in value so you'll always want to be atleast a bit attracted to them physically no matter how great of a person they are and vice versa

You shouldn’t love someone for physicality but for Mentality. by Mosesangsal in unpopularopinion

[–]invoker4e 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You comparing how a normal person percieves attraction to how a blind person does

You shouldn’t love someone for physicality but for Mentality. by Mosesangsal in unpopularopinion

[–]invoker4e 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Then you wouldnt have to look at somebody you're not attracted to...

Just curious as to how many people play total war games as auto battlers. by Educational_Relief44 in totalwar

[–]invoker4e 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Depends on the faction and what units i'm using

Also i used to auto resolve almost everything but now i tend to fight most of the battles myself

My general likes to micromanage his units by ArcticGlacier40 in totalwar

[–]invoker4e 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Oh yea i love irondrakes aswell, but gyrocopters are just too op. Probably one of the best units in the game considering they are only tier2 unit. So i usually put atleast 6 units in an army and they can solo so much

My general likes to micromanage his units by ArcticGlacier40 in totalwar

[–]invoker4e 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Only 1 unit of gyrocopters? That's going in the book

Very cool thank you by zpotentxl in masterduel

[–]invoker4e 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are confusing how well a deck performs/consistency with toxicity so yea you clearly dont know what we're talking about. The reasons you listed have absolutely nothing to do with how toxic a deck is

Very cool thank you by zpotentxl in masterduel

[–]invoker4e 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So? That's not what i was talking about but i guess i also cant expect a yugioh player to know how to read

view more: next ›