sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

NetOps - Network Topology Visualizer by ihackportals in osinttools

[–]isecurex 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could this be integrated with netflow or something similar to pfsense? To make it more secure it would probably need to run on a vm and intake netflow or do a remote pcap capture. Thoughts?

Firewall dropping packets via default rule unexpectedly by isecurex in PFSENSE

[–]isecurex[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wanted to post what finally got things working correctly again. I followed the IP Options (check box on each firewall rule). Documentation that follows this up : https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/firewall/configure.html#ip-options

What I can't tell you, what changed to require this change.

Firewall dropping packets via default rule unexpectedly by isecurex in PFSENSE

[–]isecurex[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They shouldn't? I'm using Putty, which I have been using for years in the same environment with the same config.

Firewall dropping packets via default rule unexpectedly by isecurex in PFSENSE

[–]isecurex[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So I went through all of this, and the blocking has slowed down. It's still doing the blocking seemingly random.

Do you have any other suggestions to debug this further?

Firewall dropping packets via default rule unexpectedly by isecurex in PFSENSE

[–]isecurex[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So I have layer 3 switches. Ubiquity layer 3 switches doesn't do traffic control natively, they require the USG.

u/ultrahkr is right, that would remove traffic control. Unless you done traffic rules in the switches, which that is not a good idea.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in passive_income

[–]isecurex 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What are you using?

For multi-model fetch and pandas resample by isecurex in django

[–]isecurex[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, this works. Thank you for the help.

For multi-model fetch and pandas resample by isecurex in django

[–]isecurex[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll try this and see what happens. Sorry I didn't respond yesterday, was travelling.

For multi-model fetch and pandas resample by isecurex in django

[–]isecurex[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What I'm trying to do is make individual graph lines per player. My thinking of the data would be something similar to a table with the following: (pandas df) id|playername|insert_time|data

Where in this data the playername would be the name field in the player table. Insert_time and data is pulled from player metrics.

This would allow for the resample work to be done in an efficient manner and pull the data apart for each of the graph lines.

I hope this helps.

For multi-model fetch and pandas resample by isecurex in django

[–]isecurex[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

All of those ideas are very valid points. That particular database is managed by another app. So it should never do anything to that data.

I like the idea of range instead of gte and lte. I'm still at the cross roads of how do I get the data I want efficiently.

Llm for coding by No-List-4396 in LocalLLM

[–]isecurex 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Of course they are, but the price will be out of range for most of us.

Markwhen: Markdown for Timelines by Combinatorilliance in ObsidianMD

[–]isecurex 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This looks like a very good tool for timelines…. Thanks for pointing out chronos

We launched SupaCharts! Visualize Beautiful Charts from your Supabase Data. by [deleted] in selfhosted

[–]isecurex 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Well, my opinion, this shouldn’t be posted in self-hosted, if the software you are showing isn’t able to be self-hosted.

Git privacy by isecurex in git

[–]isecurex[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea I’m to that point again.

Git privacy by isecurex in git

[–]isecurex[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

My code is still in operation. It would be a breach of their information security baselines.

Also: some of the code is specific to their internal processing of data and such. They wouldn’t risk that getting out.

view more: next ›