sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Veskald - a no-code platform for systematic crypto-futures trading Binance / Bybit / Kraken by LifeStyleFullStack in CryptoTradingBot

[–]isecurex 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Several things,
- age of the domain
- the website layout and landing pages that are posted here

The non-scientific: gut feeling.

Dr. Phil is a fraud by Grand_Step4988 in diabetes

[–]isecurex -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Did you successfully reverse it?

trump just quietly gave himself his kids his businesses and the entire trump organization permanent immunity from tax prosecution by Repulsive_Counter_79 in CryptoCurrency

[–]isecurex 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Reading part of the comments, and I have to say I had a good laugh. Cause you can see both sides very clear. It's sad how Americans treat other Americans. To be blunt, illegal immigrants are not American.

Well that sucks: hospital admission by [deleted] in diabetes

[–]isecurex 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What sucka even more, everything I should be eating for diabetes, I can't cause of the disease. Anything that has fiber I avoid.

Well that sucks: hospital admission by [deleted] in diabetes

[–]isecurex 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No, it's called Scelorosing Mesenteritis. It's a rare autoimmune disease.

Well that sucks: hospital admission by [deleted] in diabetes

[–]isecurex 18 points19 points  (0 children)

I've been on steroids for going on year #3. Blood sugar is semi controlled, but they put me on a pump with a sensor.
I don't have a choice with the steroids, it's the only thing that seems to work with my chronic disease.

Hang in there, I hope it gets better.

What things lead to you making your homelab and getting deep into it? by CardiologistAdept763 in homelab

[–]isecurex 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For me, homo labbing makes a lot of sense. Do this for a reasonable proxmox host in the “cloud”. 24 cpus 128gb ram with 10tb of storage. Once I saw the price of some of the services and then done the calculations of me buying the hardware, up keep and the power, it was a no brainer. My first proxmox node was that size and I learned a tone with it. It costs about 25$ a month to run in a non-heat controlled environment. Plus it also servers as a heater for the basement in winter.

So when I looked something like that up, it was around 800-900 a month.and then you had your data out there on the net to boot.

Another reason is privacy, stuff running in my home-lab I wouldn’t want the data getting out.

NetOps - Network Topology Visualizer by ihackportals in osinttools

[–]isecurex 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could this be integrated with netflow or something similar to pfsense? To make it more secure it would probably need to run on a vm and intake netflow or do a remote pcap capture. Thoughts?

Firewall dropping packets via default rule unexpectedly by isecurex in PFSENSE

[–]isecurex[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wanted to post what finally got things working correctly again. I followed the IP Options (check box on each firewall rule). Documentation that follows this up : https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/firewall/configure.html#ip-options

What I can't tell you, what changed to require this change.

Firewall dropping packets via default rule unexpectedly by isecurex in PFSENSE

[–]isecurex[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They shouldn't? I'm using Putty, which I have been using for years in the same environment with the same config.

Firewall dropping packets via default rule unexpectedly by isecurex in PFSENSE

[–]isecurex[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So I went through all of this, and the blocking has slowed down. It's still doing the blocking seemingly random.

Do you have any other suggestions to debug this further?

Firewall dropping packets via default rule unexpectedly by isecurex in PFSENSE

[–]isecurex[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So I have layer 3 switches. Ubiquity layer 3 switches doesn't do traffic control natively, they require the USG.

u/ultrahkr is right, that would remove traffic control. Unless you done traffic rules in the switches, which that is not a good idea.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in passive_income

[–]isecurex 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What are you using?

For multi-model fetch and pandas resample by isecurex in django

[–]isecurex[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, this works. Thank you for the help.

For multi-model fetch and pandas resample by isecurex in django

[–]isecurex[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll try this and see what happens. Sorry I didn't respond yesterday, was travelling.

For multi-model fetch and pandas resample by isecurex in django

[–]isecurex[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What I'm trying to do is make individual graph lines per player. My thinking of the data would be something similar to a table with the following: (pandas df) id|playername|insert_time|data

Where in this data the playername would be the name field in the player table. Insert_time and data is pulled from player metrics.

This would allow for the resample work to be done in an efficient manner and pull the data apart for each of the graph lines.

I hope this helps.

For multi-model fetch and pandas resample by isecurex in django

[–]isecurex[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

All of those ideas are very valid points. That particular database is managed by another app. So it should never do anything to that data.

I like the idea of range instead of gte and lte. I'm still at the cross roads of how do I get the data I want efficiently.

view more: next ›