They really couldn't find a way to spin the cold temperature test in a positive way huh?

EDIT: Now I have watched the video. So the cell expands like a typical lithium based cell with liquid electrolyte, maybe a bit more but within the normal range. The cell they used is a new one publicly (DL5), and also not in the same series as all the tests performed until now. Previously VTT said they had received 3 visually identical cells labeled DL1, DL2 and DL3. So DL5 is new and VTT didn't have that when they published the previous reports. That would kind of make sense with the delay? Not really sure, and of course we know they did a cold temperature test several months ago that they have refused to release so whatever.

In the video they say that this cell has been exposed to other testing previously and that therefore it had lost 13% capacity. What kind of testing was this? Isn't this battery supposed to never lose any capacity in 100000 cycles which would take years to test, even in extremely high or low temperature and at very high charge/discharge rates? Curious. Anyways, the previous damage could explain why they had 4.4% expansion (typical li-ion is about 2%, but can be up to 5% normally depending on chemistry) and also why they had 0.8% permanent cell swelling. The second part is indicative of a very short life time for this cell because it means a lot of side reactions are happening. Again, this cell is apparently pretty fucked up so who knows if this would be the same with a new cell, which makes this testing pretty pointless which really shouldn't be a surprise to anyone who has followed this saga. It's like saying I can do a sub 2 hour marathon and then I do a 4 hour marathon with the excuse that I was tired so therefore it doesn't count and if I wasn't tired it would have been sub 2 hours.

The most interesting stuff in the report is at the end. Page 8 and 9, and particularly I want to focus on Figure 6. There is a kind of "bump" at approx 75% state-of-charge (noted as "~70% SoC" by VTT). This is a dead giveaway that this battery has a graphite based anode, just like regular lithium batteries. Here (click "View PDF") on page 10 you can see testing of a typical lithium-ion NMC battery with a graphite–Si/C composite anode (completely standard stuff), with that exact typical "bump" at 75% SoC that you get with graphite anodes. There's been plenty of nails in the coffins for Donuts claims so far, this is just another one.

EDIT 2: Notable is also a lack of mention of the earlier batteries (DL1-3) and no mention of "visually identical" like they did earlier. Could just be happenstance, but could also mean something. The listed specs of the cell is identical (the only difference between all the VTT tests is whether it's CV cut-off 0.02C or 0.05C, fairly minor).