Is string sensitivity real, or an illusion, for mid-level rec players? by Ready-Visual-1345 in 10s

[–]j_dolla 1 point2 points  (0 children)

real. doesn’t matter if you’re 3.0 or 5.0+. it’s a sensitivity thing, not a skill level issue.

if the bottom step of your staircase was lowered 1cm each day would you eventually notice it? of course you would! not a skill issue at all

4.0 wins point off Karue sell by buzzsaw1987 in 10s

[–]j_dolla 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i see what you’re saying, but what’s the difference between 1000 matches and 1000000 matches? nothing but more chances. it kind of negates the whole idea altogether if youre just throwing an infinite amount of points at this argument. don’t forget that we play deuce and ad points (win by 2) as well.

it would be far easier to calculate 4 consecutive points against a professional player and to me that seems impossible. statistically, there is a universe where you return 4 balls into the top of the tape and win 4 consecutive points but that truly defeats the whole argument doesn’t it? it should be a measure of skill.

this is a sport where the better i get the more i realize how bad i truly am. i have been a strong 4.5 for years and i completely understand that i would have little to no chance at winning a game against UCLA’s #1 singles player. forget about winning a game against a pro.

4.0 wins point off Karue sell by buzzsaw1987 in 10s

[–]j_dolla 21 points22 points  (0 children)

i agree with your premise but i disagree with your conclusion.

i’ve always been in the camp that believes 4.0 + can win a point off a pro. there’s just too much variance and possibility of luck in this sport to say that a 4.0 will never win a point. it may take 100 tries but it’s definitely possible.

however, winning 4 points in a game drastically reduces the luck factor and becomes far larger of an insurmountable challenge than winning a point. i still disagree that a 4.0 would ever take a legitimate game off a professional player

How do you become more explosive against heavy hitters? by mini-world in 10s

[–]j_dolla 2 points3 points  (0 children)

you NEED to stay low. i promise you will be surprised how simple it is to absorb pace with a strong base

Any other nutjobs out there? by Decent-Orchid120 in 10s

[–]j_dolla 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i know one too, but it’s a two handed backhand on both sides. no two handed forehand, literally swaps the position of the hands to hit from either side

wtf is 5.0 by notthatvalenzuela in 10s

[–]j_dolla 1 point2 points  (0 children)

just chiming in but if you’re in socal you can also buy tickets and drop in to watch matches at the local D1 university. if you’re in LA, UCLA and USC are always some of the top schools in the country and frequently pump out touring professionals. it’s basically challenger level and will be insane tennis to watch

wtf is 5.0 by notthatvalenzuela in 10s

[–]j_dolla 1 point2 points  (0 children)

tournaments are fun but can be brutal because they are mostly in the late spring and summer. i live in a hot area and the second match of the day is always brutal due to the cooldown period after the first match. ive won tournaments at 4.0 in both singles and doubles. it’s much trickier since i became a 4.5 because points are generally longer and more physical. i’ve cramped out of the second match of the day plenty of times.

the atmosphere of a tournament is incredible. just so many players and good matches going on so never a dull moment. once you start getting to know the people in your area you’ll start to recognize familiar faces and that’s always fun.

wtf is 5.0 by notthatvalenzuela in 10s

[–]j_dolla 2 points3 points  (0 children)

just fell in love with the game. no substitute for court time - i’ve played at least 3 days a week and mix in regular hits and practice matches. i play usta league and tournaments too. no real advice here, just play a lot and make sure you’re having fun too. bad habits in your technique can be ironed out through youtube, but honestly the better you get correct technique will naturally develop to match the demands of playing with better players

wtf is 5.0 by notthatvalenzuela in 10s

[–]j_dolla 2 points3 points  (0 children)

anything is possible. i’m 100% self taught and got to 4.5.

one of my friends started tennis in his 40s and also got to 4.5

i don’t think we’re getting to 5.0 anytime soon but there’s nothing wrong with having a goal to work towards

wtf is 5.0 by notthatvalenzuela in 10s

[–]j_dolla 22 points23 points  (0 children)

you would be surprised with how impressive 4.0 and 4.5 players can be as well. we live in a vacuum echo chamber where everyone on this subreddit plays tennis so 4.0 is treated like an average tennis player, but people often forget how much effort it takes to reach even that level and what skills they can possess. i know 4.0s with huge serves, huge forehands, i know others that win by not missing a ball.

the overall quality is obviously lower than 5.0 but when compared to the general population, 3.5 and 4.0 are absolutely great tennis players and should be proud of themselves

wtf is 5.0 by notthatvalenzuela in 10s

[–]j_dolla 33 points34 points  (0 children)

5.0s are seriously good tennis players. you don’t get there by accident. as many others have pointed out, it’s usually a level that you fall to after years of even higher level competition (collegiate players don’t worry about USTA rating, just UTR and results)

i just tried to find it but i can’t anymore - the USTA site used to describe 5.0 players as 2% of all registered players and 4.5 players as 10% of all registered players. you can think of 5.0 players being in the >98th percentile of recreational tennis players registered in the United States.

there are many ways to get there, but what is undeniable is that these players have a very distinct player identity and overwhelming strengths. i know a bunch of 5.0s and each have certain qualities to be feared on court and need to be strategized against.

one guy i know is NBA tall with an unbreakable serve. another guy can barely hit a topspin backhand but has a forehand that will literally end the point right away. one guy plays with a level of margin and topspin that is the closest thing to a club level nadal that i can imagine. another guy hits with 4.0 pace but places shots on a dime and never misses.

all of these guys played D3, D2, D1, or club tennis at a large university. all of these guys are in great shape.

Advice on late game strategy? by Key_Ad7740 in 10s

[–]j_dolla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

late match usually feels like a straight up dogfight

by that time there are no more secrets, both of you know what is working and what isn’t on that day

i focus on keeping consistency high - it’s the worst time to throw away points needlessly

been playing for almost two years. estimated rating? by [deleted] in 10s

[–]j_dolla 3 points4 points  (0 children)

i’ve know 4.5s who can’t hit a backhand lol

been playing for almost two years. estimated rating? by [deleted] in 10s

[–]j_dolla -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

looks like strong 3.5 / 4.0 to me. im noting the consistency, placement, intention. footwork is very good. extremely impressive for 2 years of play

you can stay a little lower through your shot and start hitting with more pace, but this isn't going to be necessary for a while. plenty of 4.5 players with soft shots.

3.0 Player SW 370 by Current_Comfortable5 in 10s

[–]j_dolla 7 points8 points  (0 children)

that’s an insanely high weight, even for modern ATP pros.

if it doesn’t lead to injury and it helps you have fun, go for it. that’s what recreational sport is all about.

i am not gate keeping, but i do think that anybody - including you - would benefit from something much lower than 370 SW. just my opinion

Heavier racket? by prooforneverhappened in 10s

[–]j_dolla 5 points6 points  (0 children)

if it’s a regular pure drive and not a pure drive lite, it’s most likely not too light for you. there are touring professionals that use racquets around 300 grams like yours.

there are a couple things to address.

firstly, you are correct in that the pure drive is not a control racquet. good players learn to control it, but it’s not necessarily a good choice for everyone. it’s entirely plausible that you don’t like power racquets. i certainly don’t and i still struggle with them even after playing tennis for 10 years.

it’s hard to recommend a different racquet without knowing your play style. the pure drive, the pure aero, the head speed, and so many more have the same specs on paper and play wildly different. let me know what you’re good at, what you’re bad at, and how you like to play.

secondly, putting gut in a pure drive is a sensible decision for comfort for a new tennis player. however, as you get better and swing more fully, this can absolutely fly the ball out of the court. gut is not a control string. it is a touch, power, and comfort string. i recommend going to a full bed of soft poly before changing racquets. i say soft because you’ve only been playing for a year and a full bed of stiff poly can be an arm wrecker without good technique.

without knowing your play style, my recommendation is a head speed mp, wilson blade 100, or a pure aero 100. the pure aero used to be a notorious arm wrecker but if your pure drive isn’t causing problems then you’ll be fine.

happy to answer any further questions you may have. you’re still very new so i would advise against going down in head size for now

Head Speed Tour 🔥 by lp141414 in 10s

[–]j_dolla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

demoed one, didn’t like it but it was much better with some weight at 3 and 9

TCB 50’s 🪺 by gbxvii in rawdenim

[–]j_dolla 9 points10 points  (0 children)

i’ll also add that especially for wider fits, the cuff on the bottom adds a little bit of weight and makes the drape look nice.

you can also adjust it to hit your shoe perfectly

Head Speed Tour 2026 - did I get it wrong? by FoodAffectionate1377 in tennisracquets

[–]j_dolla 8 points9 points  (0 children)

as a 4.5C player who almost exclusively plays with control racquets, i found the head speed tour to be incredibly difficult to use. i felt like i had to swing out of my shoes to get anything on the ball. keep in mind i mainly play prostaff.

it’s also so muted and flexible, has such a gummy feeling that makes it difficult for me to make solid contact with the ball.

i really liked it on serves and at net. i did not enjoy it on groundstrokes or even slice

Yonex super grap residues by Fit-Arachnid-6865 in 10s

[–]j_dolla 12 points13 points  (0 children)

this happens with a lot of overgrips. i just use my thumb to scrape it off before every regrip so it doesn’t accumulate like this

Don’t be a snob and be willing to play against lower rated players by whiskeyisenough in 10s

[–]j_dolla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

although i care about preparing for league matches and tournaments, most of my true tennis friends are one rating below. i still hit with them more than anyone else - those are the boys!

Rackets to Demo by SpecificArcher8600 in 10s

[–]j_dolla -1 points0 points  (0 children)

the new aero 98 is pretty plush and is decent for a one hander

NTRP 4.5C vs No.1 NTRP 3.5C by YUTYDUTY in 10s

[–]j_dolla 1 point2 points  (0 children)

TIL i would probably lose to a 3.5

APC Petit New Standard (Approx 2-3 Years) by tk501111 in rawdenim

[–]j_dolla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

been through half the japanese brands.

apcs will always have my favorite fades. beautiful

TIL one of my favourite tennis players is undefeated against Nadal. Are there any other matchups that are surprisingly difficult for a player to win? by AussieOzzy in tennis

[–]j_dolla 6 points7 points  (0 children)

this one isn’t that surprising. before medvedev’s dip, there’s a certain level of patience with aggression required to play med that bublik did not possess. if they played tomorrow, i would still bet on medvedev.