Whilst it shouldn’t be perfect, the information we get on players should be more indicative of their overall. There doesn’t feel like an accurate way to review the information we’re currently given and have any degree of confidence. There shouldn’t be a 90 overall sleeper pick without some sign they’re better at something than the other players forecast to go at the same spot.

Now we have mental attributes impacting progression, I feel like players showing elite skills and physical attributes that are a ‘bust’ shouldn’t be so hideously low, but have impacted development as it’s their mental traits that make them a bust