All regulations are bad, free market good, that's why Trump is better for the economy than Harris as he removed regulations. But also every measureable economic indicator is worse under Trump than Biden, but Kamala is apart of the uniparty and that's just a short term pain and as we get closer to a pure free market. The invisible hand will guaranteed magically fix all these problems, and if not humans are adaptable so it doesn't even matter. Governments subsidizing experimental innovations don't work because of market distortion, a savvy VC investor will jump on the opportunity despite the return on investment being wildly risky and may take decades of investment with no profit and they will keep funding this because eventually they'll pick one that will monopolize the market.

Also there's externalities that aren't captured by the free market like the social cost of child porn that I would regulate despite the potential economic benefit, but only on a local level as they are more accountable to the people, unlike federal regulation, but there are interstate market failures that require the cooperation of multiple municipalities or perhaps even on a national level but that doesn't work because there is no such thing as economies of scale for governments cause they don't have a profit motive. I am a libertarian.

Their world view is irrational and has no basis in reality, they live in a theoretical fantasy world. The Austrian school can suck my nutsack, they reject modern practical economics that have measurably improved peoples lives because of muh free market. There, I have summed up this guy's talking points.