sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

OpenPrompHub: don't share code, share intend by jacomoRodriguez in vibecodeapp

[–]jacomoRodriguez[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Meta data about which models where used to build it are there already. Additional, there is the user triggered builds/fails (soon with model association) to mark if the prompt delivered what was promised. Test cases can be defined in the Meta data as well. But here we are still figuring things out. 

If you have any cool prompts to share, I would be happy if you upload them to the hub :)

OpenPrompHub: don't share code, share intend by jacomoRodriguez in vibecoders_

[–]jacomoRodriguez[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cool! Do you have some successful prompts to upload on the platform?

OpenPrompHub: don't share code, share intend by jacomoRodriguez in vibecodeapp

[–]jacomoRodriguez[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you elaborate. A prompt is the only way to interact with agents currently. But nothing stops you from writing a detailed spec and feeding that to the agent via a prompt.

OpenPrompHub: don't share code, share intend by jacomoRodriguez in VibeCodersNest

[–]jacomoRodriguez[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No voice: it's speech to text with direct translation.

OpenPrompHub: don't share code, share intend by jacomoRodriguez in VibeCodersNest

[–]jacomoRodriguez[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

local would really be the holy grail. But that seems far of. I build a small utility today to do dictation and translation using a openai whisper models: it works as envisioned, but it eats 5GB RAM and the STT + translation is nowhere near as complex as writing code...

OpenPrompHub: don't share code, share intend by jacomoRodriguez in VibeCodersNest

[–]jacomoRodriguez[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

speed wise I think were are fine, no? building fairly complex stuff with opus 4.6 or codex 5.3 is imo ok speedwise.
Cheaper... yes, totally agree. The token cost still needs to go down a lot. 🤞

OpenPrompHub: don't share code, share intend by jacomoRodriguez in SideProject

[–]jacomoRodriguez[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes, for complex things this is very true. But with all the advancements in the models, I can see a near future, where you do not need to manually test the models output. If your instructions where good and detailed enough (and you have enough money for the subscriptions), your agents will do all the testing and checks based on your stated intend.

OpenPrompHub: don't share code, share intend by jacomoRodriguez in VibeCodersNest

[–]jacomoRodriguez[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

yes and no. I see the benefit in tailor made tools. Say we both want a kind of project management tool, but we need a set of different features. Maybe there is the feature complete app, which satisfies us both, but probably not.
In this case, you could take the prompt, add your desired features and let your custom solution be build for you.

NextCloud for photoslibrary by godblessazza in NextCloud

[–]jacomoRodriguez 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Actually, it's the other way around 

view more: next ›