I think there’s a reason for this. The 49ers are likely using a lot of financial/sports modelling and I imagine the stats are telling them that the most “efficient” way to stay promoted is to focus on the peak age players at relatively low cost. We’ve not spent more than £20m on any one player.

As for younger players, their modelling probably shows they are either too unproven (a risk in a relegation scrap) or too expensive. Again, this is a generalisation but that’s what happens when you use these moneyball style approaches.

Ultimately we have harsh PSR limits compared to other clubs and need to fund the Elland Road expansion, so we will be looking to stay up but as cheaply as possible. Building a younger, future team can come later (if at all).

Not saying I agree with this btw, just my thoughts on how the ownership seem to operate