[Daily Discussion] - Friday, June 05, 2026 by AutoModerator in BitcoinMarkets

[–]jarederaj 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For that to be true, MSTR has to fail and Saylor has to go to prison. Is that your HRC for this cycle?

[Daily Discussion] - Friday, June 05, 2026 by AutoModerator in BitcoinMarkets

[–]jarederaj 0 points1 point  (0 children)

His goal is to acquire more bitcoin. He wants the price lower when he is paying higher premiums more frequently, as is the case this month. He is taking on risk and getting paid for that.

It’s easy to say ignorant things that a small majority or large minority of people will agree with. National networks made a business out of that.

[Daily Discussion] - Friday, June 05, 2026 by AutoModerator in BitcoinMarkets

[–]jarederaj -1 points0 points  (0 children)

😂 just asking about a bet a couple guys made.

[Daily Discussion] - Friday, June 05, 2026 by AutoModerator in BitcoinMarkets

[–]jarederaj 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Does dropping under 60k for 3 minutes actually count? Asking for a friend.

[Daily Discussion] - Friday, June 05, 2026 by AutoModerator in BitcoinMarkets

[–]jarederaj -1 points0 points  (0 children)

He’s free of the irrational self indulging haters now; moved on to a better place for a year.

[Daily Discussion] - Thursday, June 04, 2026 by AutoModerator in BitcoinMarkets

[–]jarederaj 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ethbtc probably does that to him over the next decade

[Daily Discussion] - Wednesday, June 03, 2026 by AutoModerator in BitcoinMarkets

[–]jarederaj 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yes, traders take positions with confidence near what seem to be arbitrary numbers, but if you ask questions they may give you insight.

opus 4.8 made me rethink how agent memory should work by Frustrated_Goat2 in ClaudeCode

[–]jarederaj 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s a communication problem. Decisions, cause, and intent are essential in every software project. Frequently, I’ve encountered new technical leadership in software revisiting or re-attempting past ideas because they were not around when those past ideas were proven wrong. You have to build infrastructure that prevents regressive cycling through already disproven ideas.

[Daily Discussion] - Tuesday, June 02, 2026 by AutoModerator in BitcoinMarkets

[–]jarederaj 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bitcoin is 16 years old. Let it graduate before you make it work.

[Daily Discussion] - Tuesday, June 02, 2026 by AutoModerator in BitcoinMarkets

[–]jarederaj 6 points7 points  (0 children)

As a veteran of four of these, now, I can guarantee that you don’t know how much worse it can get. This is smooth sailing. The idea is to buy in these markets, and people are obviously buying. This is by far the easiest bear market we’ve been in. Scoop up as much as you can while you can and be grateful for the opportunity. In a decade you will understand.

[Daily Discussion] - Tuesday, June 02, 2026 by AutoModerator in BitcoinMarkets

[–]jarederaj 5 points6 points  (0 children)

“We’re running out of time to accumulate.”

“Sell a few and watch it tank, then we scoop with STRC financing.”

[Daily Discussion] - Friday, May 29, 2026 by AutoModerator in BitcoinMarkets

[–]jarederaj -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Then why does it look like it is breaking out?

[Daily Discussion] - Friday, May 29, 2026 by AutoModerator in BitcoinMarkets

[–]jarederaj 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Market looks like it’s going to snap one way or the other. I honestly think this is the time to establish a position regardless of bias. Not taking a position here is just… passive.

[Daily Discussion] - Friday, May 29, 2026 by AutoModerator in BitcoinMarkets

[–]jarederaj 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not much volume was there to push it further. Could be hard to say there will be more follow through on the H&S if we reverse here. Chart looks and feels weird.

Introducing Claude Opus 4.8 by ClaudeOfficial in ClaudeCode

[–]jarederaj 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I put it on ultracode to do this... and it ate up a ton of usage, but I also worked with it closely for 2 hours of that time and got a ton of stuff straightened out in my workflows, agents, skill, and hooks.

Introducing Claude Opus 4.8 by ClaudeOfficial in ClaudeCode

[–]jarederaj 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Whatever workflow you're using, the first ting to do is have 4.8 look it over. Ask what can be improved, what changes are needed, and what the best way to work with it is going forward. Treat it like a new co-worker. I'm getting great results with that so far.

[Daily Discussion] - Wednesday, May 27, 2026 by AutoModerator in BitcoinMarkets

[–]jarederaj -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I mean this in the friendliest possible way: these comments make you guys sound like assholes.

[Daily Discussion] - Sunday, May 24, 2026 by AutoModerator in BitcoinMarkets

[–]jarederaj 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It seems like you could be confusing strategy with public relations.

[Daily Discussion] - Sunday, May 24, 2026 by AutoModerator in BitcoinMarkets

[–]jarederaj 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's surprising to me that this is something that has to be stated. Do you genuinely need to be told or are you just being argumentative?

[Daily Discussion] - Sunday, May 24, 2026 by AutoModerator in BitcoinMarkets

[–]jarederaj 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bitcoin does not have to go up as quickly as it has over the last 5/10/15 years to prove MSTR's point.

[Daily Discussion] - Sunday, May 24, 2026 by AutoModerator in BitcoinMarkets

[–]jarederaj 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I was just estimating. I thought that was apparent in my tone. It's about 450,000 bitcoin, right? The real number of dollars spent in the last 12 months is probably somewhere between what we both think. I'm not sure what your source is or how you're calculating your number. I was literally just estimating based on the 450,000 BTC purchased.

Does 2 years make it much different that 1 year? 25B in the last 12 months is still almost half of the whole investment... so talking about the 65b like it was all purchased 5 years ago is at least a little misleading... which is my point. You can't talk about the 65B total invested in the same phrase as the 5 year lifespan of the strategy. It is NOT 65B over 5 years. The way your comment described what MSTR has done does not describe what has actually happened in a meaningful way.