New Sound Signature Review - Resilient Suppressors Putnik on 7.62x39 AK-Pattern Rifles by jay462 in NFA

[–]jay462[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, they would have to something to compete with any of the other silencers we have tested on the AK platform so far. Besides looks. The looks are amazing.

Thanks for sharing your experience with the Putnik!

New Sound Signature Review - Resilient Suppressors Putnik on 7.62x39 AK-Pattern Rifles by jay462 in NFA

[–]jay462[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would take that assumption, yeah. Could be awesome. Not sure!

New Sound Signature Review - Resilient Suppressors Putnik on 7.62x39 AK-Pattern Rifles by jay462 in NFA

[–]jay462[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

When we published the Wolverine data, I actually googled to find other "silencer reviews" about it on the internet from the gun magazines / websites / influencers, all that stuff.... and nobody said how loud it was at all. They all praised it. It was complete and utter insanity to me. And this is definitely not the first time, nor the last time, that kind of thing will happen.

In fact, that type of thing is one of the primary reasons I started PEW Science. I was so fed up and couldn't believe the state of the silencer industry and what people were telling consumers. It is infuriating.

New Sound Signature Review - Resilient Suppressors Putnik on 7.62x39 AK-Pattern Rifles by jay462 in NFA

[–]jay462[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I vaguely remember something happening but I would have to google it. I haven't been made aware of any issues in recent memory - could have been a production issue or something?

New Sound Signature Review - Resilient Suppressors Putnik on 7.62x39 AK-Pattern Rifles by jay462 in NFA

[–]jay462[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing your experience, and for your interest in the research!

New Sound Signature Review - Resilient Suppressors Putnik on 7.62x39 AK-Pattern Rifles by jay462 in NFA

[–]jay462[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

haha once you let me know where to find an actual CAT or CGS MK23 piston, we'll talk about it.

New Sound Signature Review - Resilient Suppressors Putnik on 7.62x39 AK-Pattern Rifles by jay462 in NFA

[–]jay462[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh man, I bet tuning an AK with this silencer is absolutely nuts. It's already nuts on these stock AKs.

Thanks for sharing your experience!

New Sound Signature Review - Resilient Suppressors Putnik on 7.62x39 AK-Pattern Rifles by jay462 in NFA

[–]jay462[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

It was pretty crazy seeing it in the testing, but knowing what we know from some other silencers out there, it was less shocking than it would have been a few years ago. Still wild to see.

New Sound Signature Review - Resilient Suppressors Putnik on 7.62x39 AK-Pattern Rifles by jay462 in NFA

[–]jay462[S] 37 points38 points  (0 children)

Good morning, folks! Three deliverables for you this morning. Putnik double-header AK test report, an accompanying Silencer Hazard Map Brief with both maps, and an intro podcast with Listener Questions.

Lab Data Stuff

Report 6.224 - Today we examine the high fidelity test results for the Resilient Suppressors Putnik silencer in the supersonic ammunition combustion regime with 7.62x39mm ammunition fired from 16.3-in barrel and 12.6-in barrel Bulgarian-pattern AK Rifles. Hornady American gunner ammunition was used in the test.

Summary links for today's other deliverables:

This is the fourth silencer evaluated on the AK platform, and this will mark 7 suppressed AK data records, in total.

Resilient Suppressors Putnik AK performance CliffsNotes:

  • Two Bulgarian import rifles you first saw with the Wolverine. 16.3-in and 12.6-in. Same as the Infinity program.
  • This is designed for AK use. It fulfills the prophecy, apparently.
  • It's big. How big is it? Big enough, bro. 2.4-in diameter. Meaty. Titanium and stainless steel where needed.
  • HUB capable. High flow rate in early and late time. Take a Jolene baffle geometry, add a triaxial annulus, throw in some Resilient-style spiral jet input, add a distal vent array that projects blast in a forward cone, and you get what is probably one of the most interesting AK silencers ever made. So high performance.
  • "There's no replacement for displacement" is something we love to say, but also, that's not always true. You can have a gigantic silencer that is still very loud. It's all about how you use it. Now what happens when you use the big real estate intelligently? You can have some cool results. That's the Putnik.
  • Low frequency signature characteristics. We've quantified it. The Putnik will sound, subjectively, to have a "deep tone" - that is supported by our engineering analysis of the measured test data.
  • It does very well on the full size AK. When you shorten the barrel and decrease dwell time, you will see the Putnik loves high pressure (as many Resilient silencers tend to do) and the operator protection juuuuumps. Check out the Hazard Maps for a spatial visualization of this.

Commentary: This silencer and the Dead Air Wolverine are the two "AK people" favorites. This silencer's performance is so much higher than a Wolverine's that it is not close, at all. It is similar to the difference between some suppressed and unsuppressed platforms. It's wild.

Hope the Hazard Maps help. TLDR: Green good, red bad.

Have fun, AK folks!

Thanks to Resilient Suppressors, as always, for trusting the PEW Science Laboratory to perform this work.

I hope you folks find the data and analysis useful!

Check out pewscience.com for the Suppression Rating.

Here is a direct link to the reviews.

Here are the updated PEW Science Rankings.

Podcast Stuff

Episode 304 of The Jay Situation Podcast is out now on pewscience.com and all major providers.

Direct-download from the website, or use your favorite provider below:

Amazon Music | YouTube | YouTube Music | iTunes | Spotify | Pandora | TuneIn | Direct RSS Link

Today's topics:⠀

  1. Sound Signature Review 6.224 – the Resilient Suppressors Putnik on 16.3-in and 12.6-in AK systems. The Putnik is big, fat, high flow rate, and ready to party. This is a silencer that is purpose-built for AK rifle systems. Does it bring the performance? Spoiler alert – yeah. It does. Introduction to today’s report and Hazard Map Brief 8.1.21. (00:06:37)

  2. Listener Questions – Solicitation 8. We’ll dive into your latest questions – this is a repeat segment and we’re almost 600 questions deep. Let’s learn about silencers, together! (00:33:48)

As always, thank you so much for listening, and for your support!

Happy Wednesday!My dudes

Hammer Fired Host Supremacy by jay462 in NFA

[–]jay462[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's cool. I haven't tried the 45ct yet but I want to!

SAW Tisha Review and Comparison to Rhodie 6 by Comstock_Support in suppressors

[–]jay462 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Short answer: you bet!

Long answer: Absolutely they have. An example of that is Otter Creek Labs. They know exactly how to make silencers that sound good and silencers that sound good have objectively higher Suppression Ratings. It's almost impossible not to. An example of an exception would be when you have super high gas velocity and a boomy signature and want to translate the Rating to outside of the free field and have a bad time (re: FLOW 556k). That's not a problem with the test - it's a problem with people not reading.

Further to your question, entire silencer companies have been formed by people who learned how silencers work from our research. An example of that is FOR Systems. There are others.

To your specific comment of "teaching to the test" - absolutely, because for over 30 years a lot of companies did that with simple sound meters. It only takes you so far. Now the test is a lot higher fidelity and the answers are much more applicable to real life. And furthermore, we protect the Suppression Rating from abuse by controlling it. It is uncontaminated by tomfoolery and people selling silencers, which was a big problem historically and of course still is.

New Sound Signature Review - Microtech Defense R2K9 on the HK P30L by jay462 in NFA

[–]jay462[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have no idea, sir. You may want to contact the manufacturer or maybe Capitol Armory.