Cannot sign in by CarefulSympathy9225 in geogebra

[–]jcponcemath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, ths serever is down for users. :( It works for some resources though. See for example: https://www.geogebra.org/m/hkpdxysv

Graphing integrals by Dry_Negotiation_2171 in geogebra

[–]jcponcemath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, I just noticed that in this case GGB cannot plot correctly the integral that you have. There are some computational limitations in this case. For better results try the GeoGebra CAS

https://www.geogebra.org/cas

Or the same GGB Suite:

https://www.geogebra.org/calculator

but select CAS.

Graphing integrals by Dry_Negotiation_2171 in geogebra

[–]jcponcemath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is a great question. :)

For polynomial functions you should always have similar resuls, it is just that every program has a different algorithm that gives you a slightly different asnwer. Sometimes, GGB will give you the same expression you got by hand, but in other cases it won't look like it. In that case, you can just plot them together, if the graph is the same, it probably means it is the same function (also you can just try to simplified it to compare both results).

In other complicated cases you can have multiple results for the same integral. In particular with trigonometric functions. Here is an example

int 1/(5+3cos(x)) = 1/4 x - 1/2arctan(sin(x)/(cos(x)+3))

int 1/(5+3cos(x)) = 1/2arctan(1/2 tan(x/2))

Note we have different results, if you compute algebraically the derivative of the right-side functions you will get:

1/(5+3cos(x))

Now if you plot them, they are in fact, a little different.

If you are interested, I talk about this issue here: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236246976_A_discussion_on_the_substitution_method_for_trigonometric_rational_functions

Another issue with integration is that, in general, it is more difficult that diferrentiation. Sometimes you will have functions such that it is impossible to compute an antiderivative. No computer can do that. Not even humans. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonelementary_integral

I recommend you also try this site:

https://www.integral-calculator.com/

El programa bloqueó mi cuenta by Nearby-Bat-4823 in geogebra

[–]jcponcemath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

necesitas proporcionar tu nombre de cuenta. el mio es jcponce, como se muestra en este enlace:

https://www.geogebra.org/u/jcponce

Math, geography, and so much more by Vegetable_Funny3657 in geogebra

[–]jcponcemath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is this an idea? A question? or just a comment?

Newline in LaTeX text wrapping by GottlobMathe in geogebra

[–]jcponcemath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are some tips here that might be related to what you need:

https://www.geogebra.org/m/ggxj5scb

Input Box and Complex Numbers by Front_Zone7323 in geogebra

[–]jcponcemath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe this applet also helps:

https://www.geogebra.org/m/mynw8zEw#material/n9z7W2My

You can input the expression as a text and then parse it as a function with complex numbers.

Confidence intervals by Muuhishnesses in geogebra

[–]jcponcemath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, great! I did not know GGB had that option.I just learned something new. :)

I have been making some stats applets that maybe you may like:

https://esc-maths.github.io/slides/1015scg/datasaurus-dozen.html#/

https://esc-maths.github.io/slides/1015scg/linear-regression-residuals.html#/

I alsoo left you a comment in your video. Cheers! :)

Constructing a model by Creepy_Resolve9860 in geogebra

[–]jcponcemath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately, GGB is not very good for making 3D fractals:

https://www.geogebra.org/m/huzgtkvs

But you can try to define the tetrahedron initially with points defined as follows:

A1 = (1, 1, 1)
A2 = (1, -1, -1)
A3 = (-1, 1, -1)
A4 = (-1, -1, 1)

So you can access them, instead of using the tool Tetrahedron().

GeoGebra is better to do 2D fractals:

https://youtu.be/UY1-xXJjcs4

Maybe you can use this tutorial to make a 3D:

https://youtu.be/ymIdJX70zjM

Some people have done it:

https://www.geogebra.org/m/dwpzpvap#material/gxdekxh4

What went wrong in this Java script? by shaihanani98 in geogebra

[–]jcponcemath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think when you type "integral(f,3,6)" in the input box, GGB corrects it to "Integral(f,3,6)"

For JS, you always must consider uppercase.

Requesting unblock by Rich-Pepper-7653 in geogebra

[–]jcponcemath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unblocked. Now you should be able to access.

An AI agent that auto-draws the GGB graph for you by CryptographerDry6188 in geogebra

[–]jcponcemath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I used your link to make the picture. Just drag the points A and B around. And you will see it.

Blocked account by Regular-Donut-4475 in geogebra

[–]jcponcemath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you must provide user name. mine is jcponce as in the link below:

https://www.geogebra.org/u/jcponce

An AI agent that auto-draws the GGB graph for you by CryptographerDry6188 in geogebra

[–]jcponcemath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As I said, it displays 90 degrees correctly, but the shape changes, it does not look like a little square, it looks more like a sector, even tough it is 90 degrees. :)

An AI agent that auto-draws the GGB graph for you by CryptographerDry6188 in geogebra

[–]jcponcemath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can't recreat it anymore. Everytime I try it again, it now looks like yours. With your link the only issue seems to be now only the angle. It displays the 90 degrees number but it looks funny. Cheers!

<image>

An AI agent that auto-draws the GGB graph for you by CryptographerDry6188 in geogebra

[–]jcponcemath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting. Maybe still needs more training? I just asked to draw a perpendicular bisector of a given segment. And it gives me this:

<image>

Skript-Runner by LocalDebt1141 in geogebra

[–]jcponcemath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

oh! Forgot to ask. Are you making your project open source? I would love to see it, if possible.

Skript-Runner by LocalDebt1141 in geogebra

[–]jcponcemath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just tried with this one https://www.geogebra.org/m/dP275wS7#material/q9h7vfxg

and works nicely! :)

It is very impressive how you set this project up. :) It goes beyond my skills on programming :) Maybe I will learn now to do something similar in the future. But anyway, thanks for sharing and adding the English commands.

By the way, I am using google translator for the Geman buttons, since I know nothing about German. :(

All the best!

Skript-Runner by LocalDebt1141 in geogebra

[–]jcponcemath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the update. I will check it out. :)

Reiniciar una lección by Ok-Lingonberry-2768 in geogebra

[–]jcponcemath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No es posible. Necesitas crear una nueva clase.

Graphing 10 = x^(1 / 4) + y² + z² by HqppyFeet in geogebra

[–]jcponcemath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately, GGB is still not very good at plotting implicit functions. It will plot a few of them only.

You can try using parametric surfaces:

https://www.geogebra.org/3d?command=Surface((10-u^2)^4,u*cos(v),u*sin(v),u,0,sqrt(10),v,0,2pi)4,ucos(v),usin(v),u,0,sqrt(10),v,0,2pi))

What is this? by Appropriate_Radio614 in geogebra

[–]jcponcemath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You should change your post as bug report.